I don't think that the cops moved them. I think they were moved by the killer who I think was either the ex boyfriend or the husband and helped by Barb Janda.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MakingaMur...ied_theory_bones_barb_janda_and_mike_halbach/
Yeah, going back to this thread again, and I have to say if you're a citizen of this country and you aren't at least bit concerned about the implication of this whole case, you're either a brain dead moron, or a brain dead moron.
Hey, that is your opinion.
You know what they say about opinions, right ?
Yes, mine are always valid; that's what they said. And, they told me that to stop wasting my time with brain dead morons. I'm going to listen to them.
If one of you ends up murdered and burned and buried in the yard, we know who the first suspect is.
After hearing the initial vote of the jury I am shocked that they got to guilty. I'm also surprised by the fact that they found him not guilty of mutilation of a corpse, how can you have such split verdicts?
also, the initial count was 7-3 I believe? when they started to deliberate. and you know how god damn obnoxious those stubborn "he did it, I decided before the trial even started and I don't care about anything else" people must have been
I served on a murder trial jury and we had a couple people that were incredibly stubborn, in fact one person wrote a note to the judge complaining that other jurors weren't accepting his decision and he was upset by this. He ended up changing his vote after a few days, but that letter was/is a point of contention in an appeals case, I believe.
It's a little suspicious since as far as we know the entire post could have been fiction. The notoriety that a show like this gets tends to bring attention seekers out of the wood work.http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5189670/board/nest/251845337
Anyone post that?
Our criminal justice system is a joke at any rate. Just keep your head down and dont get on the wrong peoples radar.
Yeah, going back to this thread again, and I have to say if you're a citizen of this country and you aren't at least bit concerned about the implication of this whole case, you're either a brain dead moron, or a brain dead moron.
Your idiocy is well documented on this forum.
Have a few hundred thousand to defend yourself with. Without that it appears prosecutors will throw u in prison no matter what.
I can't even imagine...pick 12 random people and you're bound to end up with some wackos
Not just wackos, but in the Avery case, if you check out the comments at the Wisconsin Innocent Project website of this case, you will see someone posted a part of the interview with the excused juror. That interview stated one of the jurorswas THE FATHER OF A MANITOWOC OFFICER, and was one of the three "stubborn" jurors who had already concluded he was guilty before jury deliberations. How the hell did the defense and judge allow him to be on the jury?
So I finally finished this last night.I really don't know what to think. On one hand he'd have to be a moron to dispose of the evidence in the way the prosecution said he did, on the other hand we are talking about a whole family of really 'simple' people. If I had to make a judgement based solely on the Netflix documentary I'd say he did it. Was there some legal "fuckery" going on? Definitely. I want to believe, but I just don't. He spent 18 years in prison not getting any sex, released and finally found a girlfriend, she goes to jail for 7 months... I think his impulse got the better of him and he raped and murdered her.
On voir dire, you basically have to go by what a juror says. If they're biased and want to be empaneled, it's easy enough to hide your bias. Jurors aren't generally subjected to the kind of extensive background checks you would need to discover familial relationships. Maybe they would do that for a grand jury, but not a petit jury.the excused juror seemed a little too interested in the case imo, it was sorta weird. I don't see how the father of an officer could be allowed on that jury