The reason people call you out on your mistakes is you try to act like you're infallible. So go cry me a river.
Londo, as usual you have nothing better to add, so you revert to your tired old game of calling out obvious typos. Grow Up.
So people can stop following the law anytime they feel like it?For one, I don't feel like the federal government has any right to land within state boundaries that is not a protected forest or other natural area.
Secondly, really, all that matters is that bundy feels like it's unjust. If he's able to get that massive number of people to back him then good for him, he has a moral and social right to do so.
Again, our last revolution was started over what people perceived to be an unjust law. Just like the last one, there were people who were against these unjust laws.
So people can stop following the law anytime they feel like it?
So people can stop following the law anytime they feel like it?
So might makes right? This is your philosophy for life? If the government wiped these protesters out, you would side with the government?If you can gain enough support of armed citizens to cause the federal government to back down then absolutely.
Why do you think the UK and modern progressive hate armed citizens ?? It's because it prevents them from enforcing unjust laws.
Well only if they are "patriots" and hate the government. You need to get the context right.
Well only if they are "patriots" and hate the government. You need to get the context right.
So might makes right? This is your philosophy for life? If the government wiped these protesters out, you would side with the government?
So are you upset that the protestors weren't killed? It seems many leftists would have preferred violence.
No one is saying that. No one is saying anything like that. What's being said is that he cannot just decide he dislikes or disagrees with a law and ignore it without there being consequences. Try joining the conversation happening instead of the one going on in your head between the different voices.
The rebels are not Americans. They've basically seceded. It's time to pacify them. They don't even favor American people. They're basically far-right white supremacist militia types.
Obama should consider stopping being all PC about this and go full Sherman on them and raze the entire ranch. Then make it a nuclear waste deposit. Or use it as a missile test site. Or an Ebola experiment site. In any case, this leaching thug pumping out 14 children and stealing from hardworking Americans needs to be stopped and provided social services to re-assimilate into America.
All he does is whine about his distant ancestors doing something 100+ years ago that somehow entitles him to do what he's doing today. Sorry Mr. Bundy, but you are not your ancestors. We expect you to earn what you have. You didn't earn the right to pillage public lands.
No, of course they cannot pass down privileges to their heirs. These leaches need to be kicked out of National Parks. It's just sickening how crazy the American government capitulates to white privilege. Evict them, drone strike them, whatever. These thugs need to be removed. The original leases should be designated as life estates only with the rest reverting to every American.
So you support the Rodney King rioters? Or just peaceful protests where long rifles are trained on Federal agents?While I might not agree with a particular cause, I support citizen's right to support causes.
This is the biggest issue with modern progressives. You all know in your soft hearts what is right, and everyone should support what you feel.
The reality is we should support people's right to protest etc against things they feel are unfair.
I see this "patriots don't follow unjust laws" thing bandied about but I have yet to see anyone explain why exactly the law is unjust.
Are you sure?
Please, you guys can even keep your evil white guys straight. Form a cohesive argument if you want to debate.
How do you so casually and confidently make accusations of racism against people you don't even know? At the most you've seen a picture of them and maybe read an article about them, perhaps even comprehended it too.
Seriously, how do you feel right with yourself in so casually making such a strong accusation? It is a common theme of your posts for a long time
Or, rather than turning the land into another missile site or nuclear waste disposal site (do you even know if the land is suitable for that?), perhaps the two parties could be reasonable and through a mediator reach a fair financial settlement.
Afterall, the crime is the unpaid grazing fees right?
I just think racism is such as serious charge that the evidence would have to be of such magnitude and quality that they would have been banned anyway. I don't think one can truly get to know someone else enough in a forum to level that accusation, even if some posting history might appear to support it.
Then again, I also think probably 90-95% of us who bicker back and forth would get along fine over beers, and not knowing who is who would be very surprised to learn real identities and personalities in person. Too easy to build up a mental spreadsheet of other users and place each one in certain categories. In short, the mental imagery we may have of other users probably is greater than the reality.
Hopefully, or there are some true assholes here in this little corner of the net.
Funny how righties are all for armed protest unless its black people protesting.
Remember all the Fox News panic buttons pushed during the Zimmerman trial?
Remember this back in the 60s??
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/the_nra_once_supported_gun_control/
So you support the Rodney King rioters? Or just peaceful protests where long rifles are trained on Federal agents?
Trying to debate but you won't answer the question...Please, you guys can even keep your evil white guys straight. Form a cohesive argument if you want to debate.
Trying to debate but you won't answer the question...
I really think it's hilarious when you all try to bring up stuff that happened in the 40's to attempt to justify your viewpoints.
You realize that someone who was 30 in 1939 (when this happened, not the 60's as you claim) would be 105 years old?
Kinda ignored that first one didn't ya? Zimmerman trial was last year.
Your zimmerman comment? I can't keep track of your emotional trolls. Like I said, form a cohesive argument and we'll debate it. I'm just not going to entertain emotional rages from people upset at the success of these good Patriots.