HAL9000
Lifer
- Oct 17, 2010
- 22,021
- 3
- 76
You're right, Eric Bana was SOOOO much better.
That said, I'll be watching this.
I agree actually, I think the Bana film was worse, but that he was a better Bruce Banner
You're right, Eric Bana was SOOOO much better.
That said, I'll be watching this.
In the UK It's not called the Avengers.
It's called "Marvel Avengers Assemble"
Yeah, the new title stinks, but you do know that "The Avengers" refers to something totally different in the UK?
On that note, Emma Peel > Black Widow (albeit, just barely).
Looks cool. Stark continuing as the sole Iron Man seems a bit silly though, I mean I know those suits must be crazy-expensive, but it seems like you ought to be able to outfit at least a dozen people in them. A squad of Iron Men could do some serious damage. But I probably should not attempt to apply logic to this film.
Makes sense.On one hand, its freaking awesome, on the other hand holy crap at the special effects budget.
I'm pretty sure this movie is going to have trouble making all the characters relevant. The damn bow dude and the girl are completely outmatched by the big three.
Also I'm calling Thor kills the giant robot snake.
Yeah I know the reason, but I think we have the capacity to understand the difference.
It's possible that they don't have the rights to use that name?
Finally found a 2D showing, so bought tickets for Noon Saturday. :awe:
KT
I went with 3D after someone in the "rate a movie" thread said it was well worth it in 3D. Hopefully it won't be one of those major headaches and more like Avatar.
The last 3D movie I ever paid to see was Hugo. I will never pay to watch a 3D movie again.
KT
Wow it must be good if a superhero movie got good reviews from critics
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/marvels_the_avengers/#contentReviews
I look over at the blu-ray.com forums for movie information. They have a movies section and people will tell you in the threads if the movie is worth watching in 3D.
The Avengers has gotten a lot of good reviews.
Looks cool. Stark continuing as the sole Iron Man seems a bit silly though, I mean I know those suits must be crazy-expensive, but it seems like you ought to be able to outfit at least a dozen people in them. A squad of Iron Men could do some serious damage. But I probably should not attempt to apply logic to this film.
Most super heroes are written to where they really don't trust anyone at all, for obvious reasons. Why would Stark give up some awesome tech to several other people? The more people who knows a super heroes' secrets means there are more people who can potentially use those secrets against them.