New Crysis Video

[Elfear]

Video

Some of it is old news but there are some new features that are revealed that look amazing.

 

[ShadowOfMyself]

Its breathtaking... the physics really are amazing.. I can picture people "NUKE!!" *everyone hides behind building*

 

[Elfear]

Originally posted by: ShadowOfMyself
Its breathtaking... the physics really are amazing.. I can picture people "NUKE!!" *everyone hides behind building*

LOl. No doubt. I just hope they still plan on releasing it in June.

 

[Nightmare225]

Originally posted by: Elfear
Video

Some of it is old news but there are some new features that are revealed that look amazing.

Old for me, but I still think it's mindblowing. It puts that Alan Wake twister video to shame.

 

[vhx]

Heres a clip for the actual editor. It looks SOOO easy to create maps. Would this editor be included in Crysis or only for people who license Cry Engine 2?

http://www.crysis-online.com/video_down...ine)%20GDC%202007%20Sandbox%20Demo.wmv

 

[Polish3d]

Originally posted by: Elfear

Originally posted by: ShadowOfMyself
Its breathtaking... the physics really are amazing.. I can picture people "NUKE!!" *everyone hides behind building*

LOl. No doubt. I just hope they still plan on releasing it in June.

Are they planning to do this now?

 

[Elfear]

Originally posted by: Frackal

Are they planning to do this now?

As far as I know. Link

Edit: Hmm. Looks like the page was updated in Jan. of 2006 so I don't know how accurate the information is.

 

[wanderer27]

Nice Video, the Audio's painful though . . . .

 

[PhoenixOrion]

that blast physics is fairly new.

all the other tech demos are in other older videos.

 

[PhoenixOrion]

Crysis is definitely the best looking PC title in 2007.

I can say the same for Killzone for PS3.

 

[bamacre]

I soo cannot wait for this game. And I definitely want to see some benchmarks before I upgrade my system for it.

 

[PhoenixOrion]

Originally posted by: bamacre
I soo cannot wait for this game. And I definitely want to see some benchmarks before I upgrade my system for it.

i, for one, will be one of the many people who will drop whatever is the $600 videocard at game's release to be able to play the game with all the eye candy.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: PhoenixOrion

Originally posted by: bamacre
I soo cannot wait for this game. And I definitely want to see some benchmarks before I upgrade my system for it.

i, for one, will be one of the many people who will drop whatever is the $600 videocard at game's release to be able to play the game with all the eye candy.

I'm dreading the costs involved in playing the game that way. More than likely you'll be looking at a quad core cpu and two video cards to run the game with all the eye candy. If the game runs smoothly at 1600x1200 with a dual core cpu and a single $400 video card, I'd be amazed. I remember when Far Cry was released, you had to have a top notch OC'd system to play it at 1600x1200 with AA/AF on. I went out and paid $400 for an x800 Pro just play at 16x12 and without any aa/af. PC gaming aint cheap, but damn, the good games like this are what keep us spending the cash.

 

[dug777]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: PhoenixOrion

Originally posted by: bamacre
I soo cannot wait for this game. And I definitely want to see some benchmarks before I upgrade my system for it.

i, for one, will be one of the many people who will drop whatever is the $600 videocard at game's release to be able to play the game with all the eye candy.

I'm dreading the costs involved in playing the game that way. More than likely you'll be looking at a quad core cpu and two video cards to run the game with all the eye candy. If the game runs smoothly at 1600x1200 with a dual core cpu and a single $400 video card, I'd be amazed. I remember when Far Cry was released, you had to have a top notch OC'd system to play it at 1600x1200 with AA/AF on. I went out and paid $400 for an x800 Pro just play at 16x12 and without any aa/af. PC gaming aint cheap, but damn, the good games like this are what keep us spending the cash.

when farcry was released, you couldn't play it at 1600x1200

iirc the top dogs then were the 5900 and the 9800 XT, which meant 1024x768 with 2xAA/8xAF, or 1280 with noAA/8xAF (for the 9800 at least)...

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: dug777

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: PhoenixOrion

Originally posted by: bamacre
I soo cannot wait for this game. And I definitely want to see some benchmarks before I upgrade my system for it.

i, for one, will be one of the many people who will drop whatever is the $600 videocard at game's release to be able to play the game with all the eye candy.

I'm dreading the costs involved in playing the game that way. More than likely you'll be looking at a quad core cpu and two video cards to run the game with all the eye candy. If the game runs smoothly at 1600x1200 with a dual core cpu and a single $400 video card, I'd be amazed. I remember when Far Cry was released, you had to have a top notch OC'd system to play it at 1600x1200 with AA/AF on. I went out and paid $400 for an x800 Pro just play at 16x12 and without any aa/af. PC gaming aint cheap, but damn, the good games like this are what keep us spending the cash.

when farcry was released, you couldn't play it at 1600x1200

iirc the top dogs then were the 5900 and the 9800 XT, which meant 1024x768 with 2xAA/8xAF, or 1280 with noAA/8xAF (for the 9800 at least)...

I think you're right. But soon after it was released, the X800 and 6800's came out. I remember finishing the game on my ti 4200.

 

[dug777]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: dug777

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: PhoenixOrion

Originally posted by: bamacre
I soo cannot wait for this game. And I definitely want to see some benchmarks before I upgrade my system for it.

i, for one, will be one of the many people who will drop whatever is the $600 videocard at game's release to be able to play the game with all the eye candy.

I'm dreading the costs involved in playing the game that way. More than likely you'll be looking at a quad core cpu and two video cards to run the game with all the eye candy. If the game runs smoothly at 1600x1200 with a dual core cpu and a single $400 video card, I'd be amazed. I remember when Far Cry was released, you had to have a top notch OC'd system to play it at 1600x1200 with AA/AF on. I went out and paid $400 for an x800 Pro just play at 16x12 and without any aa/af. PC gaming aint cheap, but damn, the good games like this are what keep us spending the cash.

when farcry was released, you couldn't play it at 1600x1200

iirc the top dogs then were the 5900 and the 9800 XT, which meant 1024x768 with 2xAA/8xAF, or 1280 with noAA/8xAF (for the 9800 at least)...

I think you're right. But soon after it was released, the X800 and 6800's came out. I remember finishing the game on my ti 4200.

yeah, i played halfway through on a FX5200 and a MX440

Then i got my 9800 pro

 

[Eomer of Aldburg]

Originally posted by: dug777

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: dug777

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: PhoenixOrion

Originally posted by: bamacre
I soo cannot wait for this game. And I definitely want to see some benchmarks before I upgrade my system for it.

i, for one, will be one of the many people who will drop whatever is the $600 videocard at game's release to be able to play the game with all the eye candy.

I'm dreading the costs involved in playing the game that way. More than likely you'll be looking at a quad core cpu and two video cards to run the game with all the eye candy. If the game runs smoothly at 1600x1200 with a dual core cpu and a single $400 video card, I'd be amazed. I remember when Far Cry was released, you had to have a top notch OC'd system to play it at 1600x1200 with AA/AF on. I went out and paid $400 for an x800 Pro just play at 16x12 and without any aa/af. PC gaming aint cheap, but damn, the good games like this are what keep us spending the cash.

when farcry was released, you couldn't play it at 1600x1200

iirc the top dogs then were the 5900 and the 9800 XT, which meant 1024x768 with 2xAA/8xAF, or 1280 with noAA/8xAF (for the 9800 at least)...

I think you're right. But soon after it was released, the X800 and 6800's came out. I remember finishing the game on my ti 4200.

yeah, i played halfway through on a FX5200 and a MX440

Then i got my 9800 pro

Good times , Got my 6800nu for christmas and I started waking up early for school just to play it . Ah the beginnings of PC gaming, was only 14 hehe

 

[Nightmare225]

Originally posted by: Eomer of Aldburg

Originally posted by: dug777

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: dug777

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: PhoenixOrion

Originally posted by: bamacre
I soo cannot wait for this game. And I definitely want to see some benchmarks before I upgrade my system for it.

i, for one, will be one of the many people who will drop whatever is the $600 videocard at game's release to be able to play the game with all the eye candy.

I'm dreading the costs involved in playing the game that way. More than likely you'll be looking at a quad core cpu and two video cards to run the game with all the eye candy. If the game runs smoothly at 1600x1200 with a dual core cpu and a single $400 video card, I'd be amazed. I remember when Far Cry was released, you had to have a top notch OC'd system to play it at 1600x1200 with AA/AF on. I went out and paid $400 for an x800 Pro just play at 16x12 and without any aa/af. PC gaming aint cheap, but damn, the good games like this are what keep us spending the cash.

when farcry was released, you couldn't play it at 1600x1200

iirc the top dogs then were the 5900 and the 9800 XT, which meant 1024x768 with 2xAA/8xAF, or 1280 with noAA/8xAF (for the 9800 at least)...

I think you're right. But soon after it was released, the X800 and 6800's came out. I remember finishing the game on my ti 4200.

yeah, i played halfway through on a FX5200 and a MX440

Then i got my 9800 pro

Good times , Got my 6800nu for christmas and I started waking up early for school just to play it . Ah the beginnings of PC gaming, was only 14 hehe

Dayum, you started old, lol. I've been playing Doom since I was 5.

 

[GTaudiophile]

Sorry, but as amazing this game is, it's not worth a premature move to Vista.

 

[Csst]

This game going to be AMAZING!! But i don't have Windows Vista install i still use XP want to wait but i think i'll need to have Vista by than to enjoy all the game has to offer. And of course the DX10

 

[JonnyBlaze]

Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Sorry, but as amazing this game is, it's not worth a premature move to Vista.

Except its not really premature.

I havnt had a single problem with vista.

 

[bobsmith1492]

Ha, I love that tank driving through the building.

 

[sandorski]

Originally posted by: vhx
Heres a clip for the actual editor. It looks SOOO easy to create maps. Would this editor be included in Crysis or only for people who license Cry Engine 2?

http://www.crysis-online.com/video_down...ine)%20GDC%202007%20Sandbox%20Demo.wmv

Far Cry's Editor was very good and very similar. Never got into using it though, Far Cry just failed to catch on with the Mapping/Modding Community. Hopefully Crysis changes all that.

 

[JRich]

Originally posted by: bobsmith1492
Ha, I love that tank driving through the building.

What I hated about the BF series was the fact that those bishes would hide behind sandbags and wooden huts while my tank rounds did nothing

 

[Roguestar]

Signed, JRich. Nothing like some enemies hiding in a building and thinking "if I were real I'd just shoot it and the building would fall down, then I'd drive over the rubble and crush their puny flesh-bodies under my steel tracks of doom!" and at last the dream can come true...

This is tempting me towards a vista dual-boot sooner than I wanted, I want to install it and play around with it, then if it's good, format the XP partition and live off the fat of the land (D3D10)!