Seriously mfenn, you want to help these people, just take the time to learn the stuff, I'm tired of arguing with you
http://www.techpowerup.com/articles/overclocking/vidcard/159
So it's 252 watts .. ain't gonna change much
You haven't refuted any point that I've made, in fact you've only reinforced them.
Please read the article that you linked, as well as this
one on PowerTune.
Now that we've got that settled, let's break it down:
1. You claim, "The 6950 -> 6970 morph is NOT extreme and it's 277W per card". This is blatantly false based on the table in the article that you linked (which I used as a guide to unlock my 6950 to a 6970 by the way). The table clearly shows that an unlocked 6950 draws 202W.
2. I claim, "Flashing the BIOS does not change the PowerTune setting. A 6950 w/ 6970 BIOS is still capped to 200W unless you change it." Which is true based on the TPU article.
3. I claim, "Even then, CCC will only let you go up to +20% (240W)." Which is true, I can post a CCC screenshot if you really like.
4. You claim, "So it's 252 watts .. ain't gonna change much", which is true
under Furmark. From the Anandtech article, "Notably (and unlike NVIDIA) AMD is not using power monitoring hardware here, citing the costs of such chips and the additional design complexities they create. Instead AMD is profiling the performance of their GPUs to determine what the power consumption behavior is for each functional block. This behavior is used to assign a weighted score to each functional block, which in turn is used to establish a rough equation to find the power consumption of the GPU based on each blocks usage." I assumed (bad move on my part) that you understood that the PowerTune cap is not a hard TDP cap, but a targeted average across a normal (i.e. gaming) workload. It does not apply to Furmark, and I don't quote Furmark numbers to people looking to build
gaming rigs.