Fusion has AWD, Mazda has FWD. It's a wash.
not all Fusions are AWD. And obviously I am not comparing the fuel consumption of the AWD to the FWD.
I will do such a comparison. Is it fair? No. Is it valid by my criteria? Yes. Is my criteria more important to me than fairness? Absolutely.
And that criteria states that AWD shall be given preference over FWD. Thus, the Fusion would be chosen as AWD (because it can have it), and the Mazda as FWD (because AWD isn't an option).
:awe:
right. You should just say you prefer the Mazda
I like Mazdas too, but fuel economy-wise don't hold your breath.
I need a new surround sound receiver
Okay. I prefer the Mazda.
I do appreciate the input. Despite your excessive bias towards realism that insists I can't look at really nice cars.
I get 18-19, I drive 9k miles per year. Fuel economy is fairly low on my list of priorities. Actually, it's really, really low on the list.
move to SC and buy a FWD. Save money and put a nice tan on
move to SC and buy a FWD. Save money and put a nice tan on
9k mi is very little.
Bane you should shoot for the 3.5 AWD Fusion