New Pascal Titan X!

[Annisman*]

From the review..."However, in terms of gaming there’s plenty to talk about since this thing isn’t a barn burner in terms of achievable framerates, it’s a fully-fledged thermonuclear attack."

 

[coercitiv]

From the review..."However, in terms of gaming there’s plenty to talk about since this thing isn’t a barn burner in terms of achievable framerates, it’s a fully-fledged thermonuclear attack."

It better be thermonuclear in terms of gaming, since in terms of pricing it's the equivalent of mutual assured destruction.

 

[BFG10K]

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-titan-x-12gb,4700.html

 

[Nhirlathothep]

this is a lot better than gtx 1080.
i think gtx 1080 is the worst buy in the last years

 

[Annisman*]

Dying to get this card under water.

 

[Arachnotronic]

this is a lot better than gtx 1080.
i think gtx 1080 is the worst buy in the last years

This card is nearly 2x the price of 1080. In terms of FPS/$, new Titan X is worse than 1080 by a lot. Not sure why you'd diss 1080 because of Titan X.

 

[tidy]

.

 

[Railgun]

This card is nearly 2x the price of 1080. In terms of FPS/$, new Titan X is worse than 1080 by a lot. Not sure why you'd diss 1080 because of Titan X.

Only if that metric means anything to you.

 

[coercitiv]

Only if that metric means anything to you.

If that metric means nothing then the 1080 was not a bad product either, so any way you cut it Arachnotronic's point stands: there's no reason to diss 1080 because of Titan X.

 

[tidy]

.

 

[jpiniero]

This card is pretty impressive. Imagine if they'd done the right thing and released this first as the GTX1080/Ti for $720. It could have been the best card since the 8800GTX.

Well, that's not going to happen. If anything they could have charged more than $1199 and gotten away with it. If you believe the rumors the 1080 Ti (if they bother to release it) will be $899; but I would think it would be a further cut down GP102, and probably 320-bit.

 

[Timmah!]

Well, that's not going to happen. If anything they could have charged more than $1199 and gotten away with it. If you believe the rumors the 1080 Ti (if they bother to release it) will be $899; but I would think it would be a further cut down GP102, and probably 320-bit.

Personally i think it will have either 3072 or 3200 CCs. Depends on where they want to place it relatively to 1080 and Titan X performance-wise. I think 3200 is more likely.

 

[xpea]

Personally i think it will have either 3072 or 3200 CCs. Depends on where they want to place it relatively to 1080 and Titan X performance-wise. I think 3200 is more likely.

nah it will simply depend on Vega (price & performance) and nothing more

 

[Timmah!]

nah it will simply depend on Vega (price & performance) and nothing more

If its released before Vega is, then not

 

[SPBHM]

OC looks to be good...

it's a fast card, closest thing to a 4K card for sure (but still not quite there, in terms of delivering framerate the mainstream gets at 1080P)

it's a shame about the price, I guess the 580 will remain as the last big Nvidia GPU with competitive pricing at launch.

 

[Magic Carpet]

LOL $1800 for a card thats 20% faster wtf! I hope AMD releases a card soon that beats this Titan for $500

IMO, performance per dollar metric should be totally ignored in this particular market segment. Relax, take it easy.

Buy that if you can afford it and then enjoy. Life is short

 

[majord]

This card is pretty impressive. Imagine if they'd done the right thing and released this first as the GTX1080/Ti for $720. It could have been the best card since the 8800GTX.

Don't agree about the price being that low, but the rest, for sure. it would look pretty amazing on charts if the 1080 and 1070 didn't exist (yet) .As you say - very much like 8800GTX did when it launched and immediately stomped all over everything in sight

 

[Cookie Monster]

Imagine a lineup of $649 GTX1080Ti, $399 GTX1080, $299 GTX1070 and $199 GTX1060.. something similar to the old school GPU pricing.

 

[sze5003]

Imagine a lineup of $649 GTX1080Ti, $399 GTX1080, $299 GTX1070 and $199 GTX1060.. something similar to the old school GPU pricing.

Yea that would be in a perfect world scenario. We all know these prices are too good to be true.

 

[raghu78]

Imagine a lineup of $649 GTX1080Ti, $399 GTX1080, $299 GTX1070 and $199 GTX1060.. something similar to the old school GPU pricing.

We should see correction in GP102/GP104 pricing when Vega 10 and 11 land up. But thats going to be a long time (atleast for big Vega). I would say we see small Vega by Q1 2017 and big Vega by Q3 2017. Till then Nvidia's going to milk their massive time to market advantage and rack up record profits.

Yea that would be in a perfect world scenario. We all know these prices are too good to be true.

Those prices are perfectly normal and will eventually happen when AMD brings out competitive products based on Vega 10 and Vega 11.

 

[therealnickdanger]

Total beast! Can't wait for the 1080Ti!

 

[guskline]

Again, my hat is off to the Titan X as King of the Hill. Would I have chosen it instead of the GTX 1080 I bought in June of this year if Titan was out? Probably not because of the price and the fact that neither of my monitors is 4k. In addition, I had @$700 of gift cards for a new single high end card. Too bad AMD had nothing new in the market. The "waiting for Vega" line is really getting old.

What I commend Nvidia for is filling out the top end of the GPU market from Titan X to GTX 1080 to GTX 1070. I suspect a GTX 1080TI is waiting in the wings.

I also don't fault AMD because they needed to expand their market share and the RX 480 is almost surely going to do that.

Meanwhile the "new" Titan X has assumed the crown as King.

 

[nerp]

Imagine a lineup of $649 GTX1080Ti, $399 GTX1080, $299 GTX1070 and $199 GTX1060.. something similar to the old school GPU pricing.

If AMD released high end cards instead of low- to mid-range cards first, we might have better pricing for the 1080 and 1070. Maybe in a few months things will be more affordable.

 

[sze5003]

If AMD released high end cards instead of low- to mid-range cards first, we might have better pricing for the 1080 and 1070. Maybe in a few months things will be more affordable.

Yup this is why they are what they are now. Is there any confirmation that Vega will be out I. October or still March 2017?

 

[guskline]

If AMD released high end cards instead of low- to mid-range cards first, we might have better pricing for the 1080 and 1070. Maybe in a few months things will be more affordable.

A few months? We have over 4 months left in 2016 alone with no sign of any Vega until 2017, Q1? OUCH!

To me that's a long time.