New poll shows Hillary Clinton more unpopular than Trump, even less favorable after election loss

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Only because it was rigged.

I was an independent and couldn't vote in the primary for my candidate due to stupid rules.. that if you want to change your affiliation, it won't take effect for 4 years.

Bullshit. Bernie lost by nearly 4M votes, roughly 55%-43%, a 12 point spread.

You're gut hooked by the concern trolls of Mother Russia.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
26,612
24,850
136
I could care less, that election is over and she won't run again worrying about Hillary's popularity is pointless navel gazing at this point.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Yet another poll that shows Americans are really fucking stupid people. I like how every negative comment about her is actually personified and magnified by trump.

Aristocrat? The Clinton's were self made and made most of their money after politics. Trump was born rich and actively used his money to get favors specifically to enrich himself.
The presidency was inevitable? I only remember one candidate claiming that if he ran that he would win.
Corrupt? I'm only aware of one candidate who had to shut down their charity because it wasn't valid and who used it illegally (I could create a page worth of shady shit this guy has done).
Wasn't compassionate enough? I'm aware of only one candidate whose life's work was helping children and women and who had policies to address the issues that arised from policies they supported in the past (coal miners, "super predators"). Only one candidate has a history of screwing people over including little girls.

Hillary hate is a manifestation of a disease that's been plaguing American politics for decades.

Americans will get the government they deserve and will suffer from the consequences.

Winning!

But her emails!
 

Snarf Snarf

Senior member
Feb 19, 2015
399
327
136
People dislike (at least around me) Clinton because she's a corporate Democrat. She sits middle to middle right on most issues, but leans left on social issues. Her and Bill both had their part to play in the death of traditional liberal agenda.

2018 is going to go exactly like 2016 unless the DNC steps up and starts pushing a platform that appeals to the 30 and under crowd. This is the demographic that came out in record numbers and carried Obama in 2008, and the group that was largely carrying Bernie in the primaries. The "but Russia" and personal attacks on Trump aren't going to motivate anyone my age and under to go to the polls, we want universal health care, more help with student loans, tuition drops, and reduced military involvement in global issues. The DNC alienated all of the Bernie voter base with the behind the scenes string pulling and a lot of them have lost faith that the Democrats are willing or able to put forward a platform that will actually change anything. To be honest there aren't a lot of candidates out there that would motivate this younger crowd. Being from Texas the Castro twins are what most of us down here expect to be big players in the Democratic party after they have a bit more experience (Julian probably will run for governor against Abbott and Joaquin will use his experience in congress) to catapult them to the national spotlight. There are of course a few other faces that could be successful but they need to start introducing them to the public now, heading into 2018 with a strong future, talking about stealing either the senate or house back, followed by The White House in 2020.

Essentially, whoever has the balls to come out with a modern era New Deal that legitimately improves the lives of citizens will probably win in a landslide, but I don't really have the faith in anyone in the modern political theater to be brave enough to do it.
 
Reactions: Jaskalas

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,723
49,318
136
People dislike (at least around me) Clinton because she's a corporate Democrat. She sits middle to middle right on most issues, but leans left on social issues. Her and Bill both had their part to play in the death of traditional liberal agenda.

2018 is going to go exactly like 2016 unless the DNC steps up and starts pushing a platform that appeals to the 30 and under crowd. This is the demographic that came out in record numbers and carried Obama in 2008, and the group that was largely carrying Bernie in the primaries. The "but Russia" and personal attacks on Trump aren't going to motivate anyone my age and under to go to the polls, we want universal health care, more help with student loans, tuition drops, and reduced military involvement in global issues. The DNC alienated all of the Bernie voter base with the behind the scenes string pulling and a lot of them have lost faith that the Democrats are willing or able to put forward a platform that will actually change anything. To be honest there aren't a lot of candidates out there that would motivate this younger crowd. Being from Texas the Castro twins are what most of us down here expect to be big players in the Democratic party after they have a bit more experience (Julian probably will run for governor against Abbott and Joaquin will use his experience in congress) to catapult them to the national spotlight. There are of course a few other faces that could be successful but they need to start introducing them to the public now, heading into 2018 with a strong future, talking about stealing either the senate or house back, followed by The White House in 2020.

Essentially, whoever has the balls to come out with a modern era New Deal that legitimately improves the lives of citizens will probably win in a landslide, but I don't really have the faith in anyone in the modern political theater to be brave enough to do it.

If you look at actual empirical analysis of Clinton's economic record you will she she was one of the more liberal senators during her time. The idea that she's middle to middle right is simply false by every objective measure I am aware of. If you're interested to see how she stacks up I would look up her DW-NOMINATE score as compared to the median Democrat. You'll probably be amazed at just how liberal she really was. It's a common myth that she was somehow a centrist or even conservative figure.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,320
15,117
136
Lol

The under 30 crowd doesn't vote and those that do appear to be just as brainwashed as Republicans. They were born at the peak of Hillary hate so hating Hillary and bill is natural. History has never been a younger generations forte.

People dislike (at least around me) Clinton because she's a corporate Democrat. She sits middle to middle right on most issues, but leans left on social issues. Her and Bill both had their part to play in the death of traditional liberal agenda.

2018 is going to go exactly like 2016 unless the DNC steps up and starts pushing a platform that appeals to the 30 and under crowd. This is the demographic that came out in record numbers and carried Obama in 2008, and the group that was largely carrying Bernie in the primaries. The "but Russia" and personal attacks on Trump aren't going to motivate anyone my age and under to go to the polls, we want universal health care, more help with student loans, tuition drops, and reduced military involvement in global issues. The DNC alienated all of the Bernie voter base with the behind the scenes string pulling and a lot of them have lost faith that the Democrats are willing or able to put forward a platform that will actually change anything. To be honest there aren't a lot of candidates out there that would motivate this younger crowd. Being from Texas the Castro twins are what most of us down here expect to be big players in the Democratic party after they have a bit more experience (Julian probably will run for governor against Abbott and Joaquin will use his experience in congress) to catapult them to the national spotlight. There are of course a few other faces that could be successful but they need to start introducing them to the public now, heading into 2018 with a strong future, talking about stealing either the senate or house back, followed by The White House in 2020.

Essentially, whoever has the balls to come out with a modern era New Deal that legitimately improves the lives of citizens will probably win in a landslide, but I don't really have the faith in anyone in the modern political theater to be brave enough to do it.
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
Only because it was rigged.

I was an independent and couldn't vote in the primary for my candidate due to stupid rules.. that if you want to change your affiliation, it won't take effect for 4 years.

Seriously?

Anyway, Bernie would have been shredded into tiny little pieces had he won the primary. That man's past is absolute poison.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,320
15,117
136
If you look at actual empirical analysis of Clinton's economic record you will she she was one of the more liberal senators during her time. The idea that she's middle to middle right is simply false by every objective measure I am aware of. If you're interested to see how she stacks up I would look up her DW-NOMINATE score as compared to the median Democrat. You'll probably be amazed at just how liberal she really was. It's a common myth that she was somehow a centrist or even conservative figure.

It probably has to do with her willingness to work across party lines. In today's political climate, compromise and willingness to work with the "other team" are viewed as negatives.

Its no wonder that the pro Bernie crowd support one of the most partisan senators.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
10,386
7,028
136
Bullshit. Bernie lost by nearly 4M votes, roughly 55%-43%, a 12 point spread.

You're gut hooked by the concern trolls of Mother Russia.

I don't care about trolls or propaganda.

What I care is I couldn't change from independent to democrat to make a difference.

And I'm not making this up. But as long as the dumbocrats keep voting for corporate bought democrats.. they'll keep losing.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,189
14,102
136
It probably has to do with her willingness to work across party lines. In today's political climate, compromise and willingness to work with the "other team" are viewed as negatives.

Its no wonder that the pro Bernie crowd support one of the most partisan senators.

Extremists tend to view anyone not towing the party line on every last issue as being in the "enemy camp." It's the same concept that they have on the right, which they call the RINO.
 

1sikbITCH

Diamond Member
Jan 3, 2001
4,194
574
126
Never could stand her since she didn't walk out on Bill Clinton. That's never changed and I would have voted for whatever Republican ran against her except Trump.
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
I don't care about trolls or propaganda.

What I care is I couldn't change from independent to democrat to make a difference.

And I'm not making this up. But as long as the dumbocrats keep voting for corporate bought democrats.. they'll keep losing.

So, since this is your evidence that the primary was rigged for Hillary I assume that this was changed right before this primary? I also assume that you have knowledge of the number of independents that would have voted for Bernie and swayed a 12 point lead if they could?

The only thing that would have changed with the old champion of the Soviet Union, Fidel Castro and Chavez is that after his past had been shone a light on he would not only have lost the election, he would have lost the popular vote too.
 

Snarf Snarf

Senior member
Feb 19, 2015
399
327
136
It probably has to do with her willingness to work across party lines. In today's political climate, compromise and willingness to work with the "other team" are viewed as negatives.

Its no wonder that the pro Bernie crowd support one of the most partisan senators.

Working across party lines only works when the other side of the line has any intention of actually making compromise. The two party system is bound to fail in my life time, there is far too large of a divide on principles for the two sides to reconcile their differences. Basic concepts like size and role of government come to mind, a large chunk of the right would love the government to have no role in the lives of its citizens and a large chunk on the left think it needs to have more reach to protect its citizens. Ideological differences of that size are really hard to reconcile, when you reach that point both sides are going to become obstructionists.

This is a new era where incremental change isn't being viewed as wins anymore. A lot of the older protections put into place have reached the end of their usefulness in the changing society we live in today and there's an increasing group of the populace that feels this way on the left and right. The debate should really be shifting into how can we bridge the ideological divide. Is it a revision of the election process? Should there be term limits on congress in order to keep fresh candidates coming in with new ideas more relevant to modern society?
 
Reactions: Jaskalas

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
23,648
10,507
136
I could care less, that election is over and she won't run again worrying about Hillary's popularity is pointless navel gazing at this point.
She needs to keep a low profile and stay out of policy. These parties need to quit with the familial and dynastic BS.
 
Reactions: bshole

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
35,575
29,269
136
"Fuck you". Yeah, that's a message you can sell to voters.

What the hell are you even doing in this topic, or in this forum? Your hateful rhetoric shows disregard, maybe even contempt for the political process, and we know what remains when that is abandoned. To top it all off, this is your direct reply to a progressive calling for a New Deal to push "hard left". There is more than one poster here who ignorantly flails around attacking friend and foe alike. Is this hot mess the sort of thing you let Trump make of you?
We liberals bailed you out in 2008 and were rewarded with nothing but contempt. I repeat: fuck you. You do not deserve to be rescued again. America does not deserve to be rescued again. I do not wish to gain votes. I want all Democrats to abandon the political process and let the country fester in its own shit for a few decades.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
10,386
7,028
136
So, since this is your evidence that the primary was rigged for Hillary I assume that this was changed right before this primary? I also assume that you have knowledge of the number of independents that would have voted for Bernie and swayed a 12 point lead if they could?

The only thing that would have changed with the old champion of the Soviet Union, Fidel Castro and Chavez is that after his past had been shone a light on he would not only have lost the election, he would have lost the popular vote too.

That's what you believe. But 84 million millenials are voting eligible next time around. What do they care about? By 70:30 margin they care about non-expensive education, healthcare for all and livable wages. Hildabeast didn't give them that. Neither does Trump or any Republican at the moment.

There's a reason Obama's turnout was higher than ever before.

Give them incentive and they will show up.
 

Mxylplyx

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2007
4,197
101
106
I think the democrats failing to replace a single leader demonstrates that they have learned nothing. Pelosi needs to hand the reigns to a younger up and coming leader that actually inspires people.
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,567
7,622
136
The debate should really be shifting into how can we bridge the ideological divide.

By proceeding with confidence that the fall of trickle down economics will be a game changing moment in history. The end of the Reagan Era. In that moment we need clear and inspirational leaders to take charge and show people a way forward. This is about leading... by sucking up all the air in the room so "bridging the divide" becomes a non issue. The opposition just needs to duck while we stampede.

It works in the same way Republicans failed to immediately and outright repeal the ACA. Some of them are afraid to pull right and harm people. That same, basic, principle will apply to future decisions they have to make. We just need to be able to focus on economics and frame the discussion. The weight of reality comes catching up, eventually. Trump's pending implosion is a boon to the idea that they cannot help people. So who is going to help the people? We are. It's time to step up.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,320
15,117
136
Witness, first hand, the stupidity I'm talking about.

I don't care about trolls or propaganda.

What I care is I couldn't change from independent to democrat to make a difference.

And I'm not making this up. But as long as the dumbocrats keep voting for corporate bought democrats.. they'll keep losing.

Never could stand her since she didn't walk out on Bill Clinton. That's never changed and I would have voted for whatever Republican ran against her except Trump.

I don't know about you but if I hate "corporate bought politicians", I'm certainly not going cast my vote for a candidate that will give an actual "corporate backed politician" a chance to win. Of course that's assuming I'm dumb enough to believe Hillary is a "corporate backed Democrat" (whatever the fuck that means).

I also find it super rational to vote for or against a politician whose personal life has zero to do with politics and the policies I support./s
 

J.Wilkins

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,681
640
91
That's what you believe. But 84 million millenials are voting eligible next time around. What do they care about? By 70:30 margin they care about non-expensive education, healthcare for all and livable wages. Hildabeast didn't give them that. Neither does Trump or any Republican at the moment.

So I take it that this "it was rigged" thing is something you have now given up since you failed to adress that part?

There's a reason Obama's turnout was higher than ever before.

Give them incentive and they will show up.

Not a single thing in your post has anything to do with anything I've written or anything you've written that I responded to.

If you want to have a discussion where you reply to what I've written, let me know.

Until then, cheers.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,320
15,117
136
I think the democrats failing to replace a single leader demonstrates that they have learned nothing. Pelosi needs to hand the reigns to a younger up and coming leader that actually inspires people.

And that would be who?

Now you see the issue.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |