NEW Trivia Game!

[LtPage1]

Official ATOT Trivia Game

It's September, and that means a new trivia game has started! Whether you started slacking off in August, or are new to it, it's time to polish off your bandwidth, stroke your mouse clickin' fingers, squeegee the goo off your brain, and start racking up those scores! Get in here.

 

[Whitecloak]

I sucked horribly last month - posting from a pda negated whatever little good scores I had. This month should hopefully be different.

 

[Cogman]

7/10 meh

 

[DrPizza]

Holy Crap! I think I did trivia 2 times during the entire summer. Wow, I can't believe I got that far out of my daily routine!

 

[LtPage1]

I'd been wondering what happened to you. Welcome back!

edit: What, post in here about how you never play anymore, and 15 minutes later you still haven't done the quiz for today? Fie! :laugh:

 

[PlasmaBomb]

10 wow
!

 

[LtPage1]

Bump for the day crowd.

 

[lizardboy]

I will once again predict markn will win this month. If I'm wrong, I hope the same person beats him again this month

 

[Twofootputt]

Bump for a good game.

 

[StevenYoo]

woo hoo 9/10

 

[abaez]

How does this work.. is it daily or do I get an email when a new set of questions is up?

 

[minendo]

Originally posted by: abaez
How does this work.. is it daily or do I get an email when a new set of questions is up?

Daily.

 

[LtPage1]

It resets at 10pm PST.

 

[lizardboy]

Originally posted by: DrPizza
Holy Crap! I think I did trivia 2 times during the entire summer. Wow, I can't believe I got that far out of my daily routine!

Looks like you're already out of your routine again

 

[lizardboy]

From the things that probably only interest me file, we had 9 of the same players finish in the top 10 in July/August. The only players who weren't in both months were cigam_mai & hajaar.


Aug 08
1. lizardboy (670 points, 6 wins)
2. markn (604 points, 2 wins)
3. bolomite (550 points, 4 wins)
4. legendary (519 points, 3 wins)
5. hindmost (489 points, 5 wins)
6. twofootputt (465 points, 1 wins)
7. hardcorerobot (412 points, 1 wins)
8. LtPage1 (411 points, 1 wins)
9. integral (378 points, 0 wins)
10. cigam_mai (377 points, 1 wins)

Jul 08
1. lizardboy (900 points, 9 wins)
2. hindmost (672 points, 5 wins)
3. bolomite (634 points, 2 wins)
4. twofootputt (612 points, 2 wins)
5. markn (612 points, 1 wins)
6. hardcorerobot (553 points, 2 wins)
7. legendary (465 points, 1 wins)
8. hajaar (449 points, 2 wins)
9. LtPage1 (440 points, 2 wins)
10. integral (425 points, 0 wins)

 

[PetunZ]

Originally posted by: lizardboy
From the things that probably only interest me file, we had 9 of the same players finish in the top 10 in July/August. The only players who weren't in both months were cigam_mai & hajaar.


Aug 08
1. lizardboy (670 points, 6 wins)
2. markn (604 points, 2 wins)
3. bolomite (550 points, 4 wins)
4. legendary (519 points, 3 wins)
5. hindmost (489 points, 5 wins)
6. twofootputt (465 points, 1 wins)
7. hardcorerobot (412 points, 1 wins)
8. LtPage1 (411 points, 1 wins)
9. integral (378 points, 0 wins)
10. cigam_mai (377 points, 1 wins)

Jul 08
1. lizardboy (900 points, 9 wins)
2. hindmost (672 points, 5 wins)
3. bolomite (634 points, 2 wins)
4. twofootputt (612 points, 2 wins)
5. markn (612 points, 1 wins)
6. hardcorerobot (553 points, 2 wins)
7. legendary (465 points, 1 wins)
8. hajaar (449 points, 2 wins)
9. LtPage1 (440 points, 2 wins)
10. integral (425 points, 0 wins)

You just wrote that so you could show that you won the last two months huh?

;-)

 

[Mo0o]

damn forgot to rush through the answers, took way too long

 

[OdiN]

Meh......8/10

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: Mo0o
damn forgot to rush through the answers, took way too long

Yeah....the timing thing is kinda crappy.

 

[Mo0o]

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: Mo0o
damn forgot to rush through the answers, took way too long

Yeah....the timing thing is kinda crappy.

I think there should be point deductions if you take toooo long (ie looking shit up) but if you are within a certain time range, the scores should be based solely on accuracy.

 

[OdiN]

Originally posted by: Mo0o

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: Mo0o
damn forgot to rush through the answers, took way too long

Yeah....the timing thing is kinda crappy.

I think there should be point deductions if you take toooo long (ie looking shit up) but if you are within a certain time range, the scores should be based solely on accuracy.

I agree. I have dyslexia so sometimes it takes me a bit longer to make sure I am seeing what is really there.

 

[lizardboy]

Originally posted by: PetunZ

You just wrote that so you could show that you won the last two months huh?

;-)

I knew it would look that way...if there had been an easy way to jumble the order, I would have done it...but I'm lazy.

(and I've actually won 3 of the last 4 months )

 

[lizardboy]

Originally posted by: Mo0o

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: Mo0o
damn forgot to rush through the answers, took way too long

Yeah....the timing thing is kinda crappy.

I think there should be point deductions if you take toooo long (ie looking shit up) but if you are within a certain time range, the scores should be based solely on accuracy.

I'd like to see something like this, I just don't know what the "fair" way is to do it. I just don't like the fact that someone who busts through and gets 9 correct in 35 seconds is ranked behind someone who gets all 10 in 75 seconds.

 

[aircooled]

All 10 correct. I forgot about the timer. was watching the news at the same time.

 

[Mo0o]

Originally posted by: lizardboy

Originally posted by: Mo0o

Originally posted by: OdiN

Originally posted by: Mo0o
damn forgot to rush through the answers, took way too long

Yeah....the timing thing is kinda crappy.

I think there should be point deductions if you take toooo long (ie looking shit up) but if you are within a certain time range, the scores should be based solely on accuracy.

I'd like to see something like this, I just don't know what the "fair" way is to do it. I just don't like the fact that someone who busts through and gets 9 correct in 35 seconds is ranked behind someone who gets all 10 in 75 seconds.

just set an arbitrary cut off. say 90 seconds