*NEW UPDATED 2* Post Your Cinebench R11.5 Score

[Burpo]

But will it run Minecraft?

LOL, Thanks Guys

BOOM!

Not anymore..

 

[ClockHound]

But will it run Minecraft?

Not anymore..

It ran it just fine. Want to see it again?

Don't blink. :biggrin:

 

[techjesse]

Running Crysis 3 over 100FPS LOL even in a tank

 

[MongGrel]

But will it run Minecraft?



Not anymore..

It ran it just fine. Want to see it again?

Don't blink. :biggrin:

 

[techjesse]

Yea, goofy guys Ln2 Rocks

 

[Bushwicktrini]

 

[Hail The Brain Slug]

Here's my best run on my 5960x so far. Not too shabby.

 

[burninatortech4]

Sold my 760k to a friend. Didn't see a 7870k on the list yet.

 

[Face2Face]

[/URL]

 

[crashtech]

Locked Skylake i3 OC!

Beating a low end Haswell i5, btw...

 

[DrMrLordX]

Interesting. I know this is an R11.5 thread, but do we have an R10 thread? I'd like to see an R10 score for that i3-6100.

 

[crashtech]

Interesting. I know this is an R11.5 thread, but do we have an R10 thread? I'd like to see an R10 score for that i3-6100.

I don't know about an R10 thread, but here you go:

4.35GHz is easier to maintain with the beta BIOS.

 

[SPBHM]

on par with the I5 2500K and i7 975 on cb10 MT
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4083/35031.png

ST result is almost the same as the Q6600 MT result lol

 

[crashtech]

on par with the I5 2500K and i7 975 on cb10 MT
http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/graph4083/35031.png

ST result is almost the same as the Q6600 MT result lol

It would be a bit brash to compare the i3-6100 to a stock-clocked 2500K, but what I found interesting was that the i3 could keep up with an i5-4430. HT has come a long way since its re-introduction in Nehalem!

 

[Deders]

6700K@4.6, sig rig.

 

[SPBHM]

It would be a bit brash to compare the i3-6100 to a stock-clocked 2500K, but what I found interesting was that the i3 could keep up with an i5-4430. HT has come a long way since its re-introduction in Nehalem!

true, but at least with the 2500K you can pretend it's a 2500 since it performs the same

looking at the 11.5 score a stock 2500 should still be around .3 faster at least

I think the most impressive aspect is the single thread performance, not really HT scaling better, if you look at your "2.24x speedup" on cb10 that's basically the same you would get with a first gen i3 530!?

 

[DrMrLordX]

I don't know about an R10 thread, but here you go:

Thanks! That thing turns in a score that's pretty damn impressive compared to the Haswell scores I've seen for the same benchmark.

 

[crashtech]

I think the most impressive aspect is the single thread performance, not really HT scaling better, if you look at your "2.24x speedup" on cb10 that's basically the same you would get with a first gen i3 530!?

Not all applications utilize HT equally as efficiently, nor all all loads suited equally to it; the conclusions that can be drawn from software whose development predates HT's reintroduction are necessarily limited.

 

[fourdegrees11]

CineBench Scores, Quad Core/Module, 4T:


crashtech ______ i5-6600K ____________ 4.80GHz | 9.15
Kenmitch _______ i5-2550K ____________ 5.40GHz | 8.42
BallaTheFeared _ i5-4670K ____________ 4.88GHz | 8.41
Face2Face ______ i5-3570K ____________ 5.00GHz | 8.29
Yuriman ________ i5-3570K ____________ 4.80GHz | 7.73
Sable __________ i5-2500K ____________ 4.99GHz | 7.66
ZGR ____________ i5-4690K ____________ 4.60GHz | 7.50
Bubbleawsome ___ i5-4670K ____________ 4.40GHz | 7.37
inf64 __________ i5-4690K ____________ 4.30GHz | 7.36
CuriousMike ____ i5-2500K ____________ 4.60GHz | 7.20
Rakehellion ____ i5-3570K ____________ 4.20GHz | 6.84
StrangerGuy ____ i5-2500K ____________ 4.30GHz | 6.81
CHADBOGA _______ i5-3570K ____________ 4.00GHz | 6.65
crashtech ______ i5-4670 _____________ 3.60GHz | 6.16
Lil Frier ______ i5-4670K ____________ 3.60GHz | 6.13
Conroe _________ Xeon E5450 __________ 4.27GHz | 5.19
T_Yamamoto _____ i5-4430 _____________ 3.00GHz | 5.14

I'm curious what the difference is? RAM speed maybe?

(didnt read thread)

 

[Deders]

I think the most impressive aspect is the single thread performance, not really HT scaling better, if you look at your "2.24x speedup" on cb10 that's basically the same you would get with a first gen i3 530!?

Not all applications utilize HT equally as efficiently, nor all all loads suited equally to it; the conclusions that can be drawn from software whose development predates HT's reintroduction are necessarily limited.

Not really sure why but my R10 benchmark showed less than 4x improvement with multi-threading.

 

[crashtech]

Not really sure why but my R10 benchmark showed less than 4x improvement with multi-threading.

Might be interesting to run 11.5 again but include an ST result, I think we might see an improvement.

 

[crashtech]

I'm curious what the difference is? RAM speed maybe?

(didnt read thread)

RAM speed does seem to have a small effect, also reviewers notice small but measurable differences between mobo brands. Your setup is performing well!

 

[Deders]

Might be interesting to run 11.5 again but include an ST result, I think we might see an improvement.

My 3rd result on this thread shows a 5.09x improvement over single thread.

 

[SPBHM]

Not all applications utilize HT equally as efficiently, nor all all loads suited equally to it; the conclusions that can be drawn from software whose development predates HT's reintroduction are necessarily limited.

but for CB10 specifically it's not HT improvements that can explain why it competes with quads, but the high ST performance + expected gain from HT (same gain as other older i3s on the same program)

I don't think they have anything to specific for HT in any Cinebench?

on cinebench R15 I have my i3 2100 results
MT 266
ST 106

and i3 6100 results from Digital Foundry
MT 391
ST 156

it's exactly the same gain

now as you said other workloads like a game might give a better result for the changes in architecture and HT in terms of scaling, but it seems like both CB10 and 15 have similar scaling with older and newer CPUs with HT

Not really sure why but my R10 benchmark showed less than 4x improvement with multi-threading.

quads with no HT and no Turbo would be getting around 3.6x on CB R10 I think, your result is around the same as an old i7 scaling (without turbo)

 

[skipsneeky2]

Today or tomorrow i will be posting my wifes G1820 when it comes in.It's going to be paired for the moment with a single 4gb stick of 1333 memory.Should be interesting to see how it compares to the other G1820 result.