Oh yeah, suing. That doesn't really happen over here that often, and the UK are not financially responsible for that over here. It's crazy over there.
If the police were legally obligated to protect individuals in the US then the police would be financially responsible for not doing so and police officers, police departments and local governments would go bankrupt over night dealing all the lawsuits filed by victims of crime. Or worse go bankrupt trying to provide enough officers to "stop ALL crime, All the time" by employing a huge massive army of police officers and staff to meet such an unobtainable obligation.
The real problem is that after a nut job Arizonian Minute Man shot a Jewish Congresswoman in the back of the head, the state of Arizona is still selling guns to any sun baked dope no questions asked.
When your typical Minute Man isn't fantasizing about overthrowing the government, they are bartering guns to Mexicans for their drugs. Or they just sell to their fellow loons. In what world does a loon sell another loon a gun and get to call it commerce?
The real problem is that after a nut job Arizonian Minute Man shot a Jewish Congresswoman in the back of the head, the state of Arizona is still selling guns to any sun baked dope no questions asked.
When your typical Minute Man isn't fantasizing about overthrowing the government, they are bartering guns to Mexicans for their drugs. Or they just sell to their fellow loons. In what world does a loon sell another loon a gun and get to call it commerce?
Wait, so people from new york went on a "sting" operation and secretly video taped people who were actually not in violation of any laws, in another state? Man if I lived in New York I'd be pissed my city government spent money on this...this is retarded. No I take that back, even most retards aren't this stupid.
There's rumblings on Foxnews that Arizona is going to subpoena and charge Bloomberg because of the straw purchases. That's a no-no.
There's rumblings on Foxnews that Arizona is going to subpoena and charge Bloomberg because of the straw purchases. That's a no-no.
There's rumblings on Foxnews that Arizona is going to subpoena and charge Bloomberg because of the straw purchases. That's a no-no.
The real problem is that after a nut job Arizonian Minute Man shot a Jewish Congresswoman in the back of the head, the state of Arizona is still selling guns to any sun baked dope no questions asked.
When your typical Minute Man isn't fantasizing about overthrowing the government, they are bartering guns to Mexicans for their drugs. Or they just sell to their fellow loons. In what world does a loon sell another loon a gun and get to call it commerce?
Well you've certainly insured that you've lost all creditability in this thread. Considered yourself irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Now go on outside and play with your friends while the adults have their discussion.
That would be so wonderful. He did that shit in TN a while back, and it was the same story. He bought handguns from "dealers" (individuals, not FFL folks), and claimed oh look no background check. Someone needs to background check him in the head.
There's rumblings on Foxnews that Arizona is going to subpoena and charge Bloomberg because of the straw purchases. That's a no-no.
Might want to look at Vermont's population density, racial composition, etc. first before declaring it's solely their gun laws that make them a low crime state.
I am not sure if you can use evidence obtained illegally to prosecute the sellers for what offensives they may or may not have committed...But in the meantime don't forget to ask yourself if Bloomberg's boys get in trouble for buying guns, don't the sellers of said guns get in trouble as well?
That would be awesome.There's rumblings on Foxnews that Arizona is going to subpoena and charge Bloomberg because of the straw purchases. That's a no-no.
don't the sellers of said guns get in trouble as well? What you don't think they duped the sellers huh?
Any government that does not allow / or restricts the right of firearms ownership, does not a free country make.
I'll take Canadian freedoms over American freedoms any day.
And what do you say about the fact that you already restrict the right of firearm ownership?
I'll take Canadian freedoms over American freedoms any day.
And what do you say about the fact that you already restrict the right of firearm ownership?
When you guys are done beating off to the shit Megan Kelly says on Fox News, lets just see how this plays out. But in the meantime don't forget to ask yourself if Bloomberg's boys get in trouble for buying guns, don't the sellers of said guns get in trouble as well? What you don't think they duped the sellers huh?
And what do you say about the fact that you already restrict the right of firearm ownership?
Be careful on how many characters you use in your post. Wouldn't want to hit your internet cap.
We only restrict firearm ownership to those that have proven they are not responsible enough to exercise that right. Any state that tries to ban firearms needs to have their laws struck down, and the 1936 NFA, the Gun Control Act of 1968, and the 1986 FOPA need to all be repealed.
If someone from New York went to Arizona, purchased a handgun and brought it back to New York, they certainly need to be punished to the fullest extend of the law - regardless of who it is.
Sounds like you're contradicting yourself, otherwise why would laws need to be repealed?