Newegg Drops Barton 2500 to $88

stevejst

Banned
May 12, 2002
1,018
0
0
AMD is sinking into deeper and deeper trouble, announcing $100 million lower sales in Q2 which is 7th consecutive quarter of losses for AMD, and this one is really a hard one. Buy chips before they are gone, the way the things are AMD might never see the end of the tunnel.
Pentium IVC is all over Athlon XP, and Prescott will eat Hammer alive. All these delays and nothing at the end.
 

TekDemon

Platinum Member
Mar 12, 2001
2,297
1
81
Originally posted by: stevejst
AMD is sinking into deeper and deeper trouble, announcing $100 million lower sales in Q2 which is 7th consecutive quarter of losses for AMD, and this one is really a hard one. Buy chips before they are gone, the way the things are AMD might never see the end of the tunnel.
Pentium IVC is all over Athlon XP, and Prescott will eat Hammer alive. All these delays and nothing at the end.

Yeah things don't look good for AMD on the desktop side...I guess they're hoping Opteron will save them or something...

But who knows...I thought AMD had a chance starting from when the K5 came out...(of course, at that point I was largely a computer illiterate 12 year old so I don't know if my opinion really counted =P) but the K6-2 bore out the feeling that got stronger with the K6.

Of course, nowadays I don't feel that feeling anymore about AMD =(
In the total tally of my CPU purchases it goes:
Pentium 166(from a prefab Compaq! aaahh!!! and not even the good Compaqs, this was a 1996 "let's build crapmachines" Compaq Presario 4712 that benchmarked worse than a P90 on almost all benchmarks-YES THAT INCLUDES CPU BENCHES!)
Pentium III 450Mhz Slot 1 SECC2 Poor overclocker even though I had the same heatsink as the CPU below
Pentium III 550"E" Coppermine Slot1 SECC2(thought my 450Mhz was dead actually...but it wasn't, just really bad alignment after I took off the back cover for the CPU-it had the Alpha P3125 on it heh and I did the ball pen tube mod) Overclocking god! This thing ran 842Mhz ROCK solid. I don't know why there wasn't more press on this CPU, but I bought it the day it was out on Googlegear.com because originally I was going to have to go with a slocket to use the flip grid chips. All I found later on was a blurb passage on some tech site about how some people are reporting decent results. Everybody was too caught up in FC-PGA socket chips and totally ignored this awesome CPU! Ran 733Mhz out of the box on stock cooler but I didn't push it to 842 until I put the Alpha on-was on a BX440 board with Corsair PC133 Cas3(they had the newer Cas2 out but I bought the RAM when PC133 was new and it was really for my P3 450) that was a 153Mhz FSB in case nobody figured it out!
AMD Athlon 1.2Ghz Thunderbird(bought this for my new PC for college =) not much to say really, ran it with 2 boards, both with DDR-first was an ASUS with one of those hybrid AMD north and southbridge setups[too long ago for me to remember, damn my memory is getting bad], then a Shuttle AK31A with KT266A[BIG improvement actually, noticable FPS improvement in almost all games])
Intel Pentium IV 1.6A-disappointed by this chip since it had such a reputation but didn't OC well at all for me-used in new college PC(upgrade itch ok?) Couldn't hold past 1.9 stably regardless of voltage-stock cooler
AMD AthlonXP 1600+ AGOIA(bought it cheap off of a deal here and OC'ed it...holds 2100+ just fine-is an upgrade for the 1.2Ghz T-bird)
Intel Pentium IV 2.4-not so great overclocking either actually, but nonetheless a hell of a lot faster than a 1.6A anyway(@2.7 now stock cooler)

Anyways, so you can see I've been rather even about my CPU purchases lately. I'm definitely looking at building another PC now and it's definitely a hard choice. I'm thinking about simply waiting for Prescott, but Intel isn't feeling pressured to bring up the release any because of AMD's less than spectacular showing lately. I will say this much though, Barton seems to be a much better overclocking deal than the Pentium 4's in my opinion(the low end chips I mean). Even though everybody keeps talking about how their P4C's overclock great, the fact that I've had 2 Pentium 4's with lousy overclocking ability(to be fair the Thunderbird sucked too-and it had an Alpha cooler) has put me off of trying to overclock Intel's lower end...I guess their binning computer's make it a luck of the draw thing.


 

ThaGrandCow

Diamond Member
Dec 27, 2001
7,956
2
0
I don't think AMD is going anywhere for a while. When the move to 64-bit happens shortly, Intel is sitting with their pants down. AMD & Intel made different choices on how to approach 64-bit... Intel dropped the ball and AMD was there to grab it and slam dunk it.
 

Quickfingerz

Diamond Member
Jan 18, 2000
3,176
0
0
No, AMD needs to get to the into the portable market. They won't make enough just with an introduction to even a superior 64-bit chip.
 

noleman28

Junior Member
Aug 3, 2002
15
0
0
^ They are.....what are you talking about....now they just need to implement the Athlon-64 into laptop's.
 

prometheusxls

Senior member
Apr 27, 2003
830
0
0
The way I see the CPU benchmarks sorting out for the P4C vs. Barton is that 3200+=2.2GHz. This 3200+ chip is comparable to the 2.4C in most benches. Basicly AMD and Intel are same perfomance clock for clock so 3200+ label is even more BS than ever. 3200+ is just a 2.2GHz when compared to Intels P4C line.

That siad this is a sweet deal.
 

BlackMamba

Golden Member
Sep 23, 2000
1,259
0
76
if i get two 1700+'s and use some bubble gum to mash them to each other, that will get me 3400+ for $88, so i think that's a better deal.

update: gives me a hankering for some doublemint gum
 

MrMaster

Golden Member
Nov 16, 2001
1,235
2
76
www.pc-prime.com
Originally posted by: CPUtester
if i get two 1700+'s and use some bubble gum to mash them to each other, that will get me 3400+ for $88, so i think that's a better deal.

If you only gently smash them...I'll buy those 1700's.:evil:
 

Budmantom

Lifer
Aug 17, 2002
13,103
1
81
Originally posted by: CPUtester
if i get two 1700+'s and use some bubble gum to mash them to each other, that will get me 3400+ for $88, so i think that's a better deal.

LOL

 

Macro2

Diamond Member
May 20, 2000
4,874
0
0
IBM just announced Opteron servers...

The P4 3.2 dissapates 85 to 100 watts...

It's Intel that is wavering.

You will understand this in due time.
 

dud

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2001
7,635
73
91
Whether our fav is Intel or AMD it just does not matter. We all better hope and pray that AMD survives. The competition that AMD brings to the PC marketplace keeps prices down on both CPUs. If AMD goes down then Intel will have no viable competition which in turn will cause prices to rise for both CPUs and PCs in general. A healthy AMD benefits all consumers of both CPUs.
 

docinthebox

Golden Member
Jun 9, 2000
1,118
0
0
Market cap of Intel: $133 billion
Market cap of AMD: $2 billion

This about sums up the situation. Think about how many engineers Intel can hire, vs. AMD. This equates to how many concurrent projects each side can invest on at any one time, and how fast each side can develop a new technology.
 

cmsanto

Member
Dec 7, 2001
145
0
0
Originally posted by: dud
Whether our fav is Intel or AMD it just does not matter. We all better hope and pray that AMD survives. The competition that AMD brings to the PC marketplace keeps prices down on both CPUs. If AMD goes down then Intel will have no viable competition which in turn will cause prices to rise for both CPUs and PCs in general. A healthy AMD benefits all consumers of both CPUs.

Well said. Without AMD intel chip prices would certainly be higher than what they are today.
Competition is healthy without competition you get the equivalent of your local cable company, shoddy service and high prices. :disgust:
 

docinthebox

Golden Member
Jun 9, 2000
1,118
0
0
With IBM on their side now, AMD might stand a better chance of surviving. Some valuable things IBM can offer to AMD: sales channel (e.g. opteron servers as mentioned before), fabs (IBM has great fab technology), and maybe additional funding when AMD needs it.

It's kind of interesting to see that IBM is now the good guy, embracing the "alternative" players in the computer world like linux and AMD, helping dissolve the monopolies of Microsoft and Intel.
 

BigJimbo

Golden Member
Aug 4, 2002
1,193
0
0
is the only difference btwn the barton and the TB the cache?
cuz you can get the 2600+ TB for 10$ more and its 200mhz faster

or is the added cache suffice just as good?
 

docinthebox

Golden Member
Jun 9, 2000
1,118
0
0
Originally posted by: BigJimbo
is the only difference btwn the barton and the TB the cache?
cuz you can get the 2600+ TB for 10$ more and its 200mhz faster

or is the added cache suffice just as good?

As far as I know, the extra L2 cache is the only difference between the barton and the TBred B.

You said that the 2600+ TB is 200MHz faster, that's only the rated speed. There's no guarantee that in terms of OC, it'll be 200MHz faster as well. It could be slower, same or faster than the 2500 barton (similar to 1700 TB).

 

cameronj

Member
Aug 23, 2002
67
0
0

Market cap of Intel: $133 billion
Market cap of AMD $2 Billion

That explains why Intel CPUs are less than 10% faster than AMD's right now, huh Imagine what better management and talent could do with all the resources at Intel's disposal!
 

540mb

Senior member
Jun 2, 2003
207
0
0
Originally posted by: Macro2
IBM just announced Opteron servers... The P4 3.2 dissapates 85 to 100 watts... It's Intel that is wavering. You will understand this in due time.

Thanks for showing how stupid some AMD fans really are. You keep thinking Intel is the one that is wavering. Hmm...buy a 3200+ for $450 or buy a 2.4C for $175. Did I mention that the 2.4C outperforms the 3200+?

Welp, time for me to get a barton 2500 for my super cheapo machine. I do have to say thanks to all you hot deals people. When everything is all put together I will have been able to get a 2500+, 512 MB 2100, 80GB(8mb buf), CDRW, geforce 3 ti 200, Asus mobo, aluminum case for less than $250. Thanks again.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |