Next move by Republicans: Pack the courts by adding 50% new positions, eliminating others

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
Desperation move by the GOP. They see the demographics, and they know they've lost young voters, and their voters are finally going to assume room temperature. So they are pulling out all the stops to try to lock in their temporary advantage for when their voters are gone. So we are seeing gerrymandering, SCOTUS packing, voter suppression, and this stunt.
Republicans think they will be able to govern this country through the courts when the voters throw them out of Congress. Good luck with that. Democrats can always add even more seats to each and every one of these courts, and GOP even bringing this up opens up SCOTUS to Democrat packing. And that would be the best case scenario for the GOP. There are other scenarios, maybe they should ask Manafort about his former clients.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
Reactions: rvborgh

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
What's not to like? You act as if the Democrats weren't at fault for the filibuster nuke that Harry Reid tossed or they hadn't planned on the same thing for the SC .
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/harry-reid-if-gop-blocks-scotus-in-2017-dems-should-go-nuclear-again

You're all just angry it isn't your side that's doing it.

Oh, please. This is entirely different. Reid never suggested changing the structure of the federal judiciary or adding a single member.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
Oh, please. This is entirely different. Reid never suggested changing the structure of the federal judiciary or adding a single member.
No, that's left to Senseamp and other Democrats. But they were certainly looking forward to the change in the filibuster of the SC though, weren't they?
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
No, that's left to Senseamp and other Democrats. But they were certainly looking forward to the change in the filibuster of the SC though, weren't they?

And Duh-flect, obviously. Senseamp isn't the co-founder of the Federalist Society, an umbrella organization for the right wing of America.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Why not, FDR already threatened it to get his way with the New Deal until SCOTUS backed down. Why not go ahead and actually do it next go around.

You mean if the Trumpublicans don't do it first? The proposal at hand is every bit as radical as packing the SCOTUS if not more so.
 

senseamp

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,195
126
Republicans undermine the judiciary at their peril. Liberal acceptance of legitimacy of the courts is first and foremost in Republican interest as we head into demographic changes where the Republican base relocates to the cemetery. They are going to be the minority party, especially in urban centers of political power. A discredited judiciary supplanted by mob rule is not in their interest.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
Republicans undermine the judiciary at their peril. Liberal acceptance of legitimacy of the courts is first and foremost in Republican interest as we head into demographic changes where the Republican base relocates to the cemetery. They are going to be the minority party, especially in urban centers of political power. A discredited judiciary supplanted by mob rule is not in their interest.

It is if the mob dances to their tune.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
Republicans undermine the judiciary at their peril. Liberal acceptance of legitimacy of the courts is first and foremost in Republican interest as we head into demographic changes where the Republican base relocates to the cemetery. They are going to be the minority party, especially in urban centers of political power. A discredited judiciary supplanted by mob rule is not in their interest.
Except we've been hearing the minority party since Reagan was first elected, it hasn't happened so far. A discredited Judiciary is being supplanted by conservatives even as you type it.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
The only people who would be in support of this are ones so concerned with winning that they don’t care if the trophy they get is on fire. People usually vastly overuse the threat of violence or revolution or whatever but if conservatives try to push minority power so far that the courts are turned into partisan actors like this they will not like the results of delegitimizing the system they rely on for that minority power.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,723
2,064
136
As if liberal activist judges haven't been working overtime to delegitimize the system for decades, suddenly now it becomes a problem.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,825
49,526
136
As if liberal activist judges haven't been working overtime to delegitimize the system for decades, suddenly now it becomes a problem.

I have zero doubt that you understand the difference between judges making rulings you disagree with and attempting to pack the courts in this way. It’s shameful that you would even attempt to defend this sort of thing. This is a good test of who is interested in a functioning government vs. who is rooting for their political football team though. Color me totally unsurprised which side you fall on.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,345
15,156
136
As if liberal activist judges haven't been working overtime to delegitimize the system for decades, suddenly now it becomes a problem.

Go ahead and give me examples and explain why the particular examples are "activist judges" and how they have been trying delegitimize the system.

I'll start: 2008 heller decision went against the precedent of 150 years of supreme court rulings.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
16,848
13,784
146
As if liberal activist judges haven't been working overtime to delegitimize the system for decades, suddenly now it becomes a problem.
Shh shhh.
It’s ok. There really aren’t liberal activists under your bed waiting for you to close an eye.

Try to picture yourself like Superman but dual wielding two AR15s. Nothing can harm you. Do you have that picture in your head?

Ok? Now do you think it’s a good idea for either party to pack the courts with incompetent partisan judges or should we the people demand a competent judiciary that impartially interprets the law protecting all US citizens?
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
32,345
15,156
136
Shh shhh.
It’s ok. There really aren’t liberal activists under your bed waiting for you to close an eye.

Try to picture yourself like Superman but dual wielding two AR15s. Nothing can harm you. Do you have that picture in your head?

Ok? Now do you think it’s a good idea for either party to pack the courts with incompetent partisan judges or should we the people demand a competent judiciary that impartially interprets the law protecting all US citizens?


I'm watching you...
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,131
5,658
126
Shh shhh.
It’s ok. There really aren’t liberal activists under your bed waiting for you to close an eye.

Try to picture yourself like Superman but dual wielding two AR15s. Nothing can harm you. Do you have that picture in your head?

Ok? Now do you think it’s a good idea for either party to pack the courts with incompetent partisan judges or should we the people demand a competent judiciary that impartially interprets the law protecting all US citizens?

Neither. He's of the opinion that it should be stacked with Conservatives and completely devoid of Liberals. Always.
 

crashtech

Lifer
Jan 4, 2013
10,556
2,139
146
Trump must be channeling FDR, in the spirit of history never repeating, but often rhyming. I hope he fails at it just as FDR did.

"Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937"
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |