Anything else you'd like to add about the game
I saw that as well in the GB game and thought WTF? I was not aware that you could do that either. I don't know if it's new this year or just one of those many oddities of the rules in the NFL that just rarely happens.Nice to see the Seahacks didn't get the normal ref help st the end of the game.
Is there a new rule I'm not aware of this year about refs calling penalties on a challenge? Green Bay was challenging a spot , refs noticed an Atl player 5 feet short from getting oob and called them for a penalty. Yet they didn't give Atl the time out they called, even when the same video that showed 12 on the field, showed the coach calling s timeout. Everything should be reviewable. Picking what can and can't be is dumb .
And Newton was right in his press conference, he's usually treated differently. Yeah he's a runner a lot and the rules do change when out of the pocket, missing that knee shot is inexcusable. He should be pissed. If it happened to Brady, it'd have been called. The rule is there because of Brady when he got hurt.
This has to be the worst officiated season I've seen. So many terrible and missed calls, and the end of games too.
It's really difficult to explain to non-hardcore football fans what the heck is happening in these games and why calls are/aren't being made. It's making the games difficult to watch for me.
But! At least it's not the NBA!
Nice to see the Seahacks didn't get the normal ref help st the end of the game.
Seattle was the most penalized team at least last season, and maybe the year before. Not sure where people get the fantasy that the refs help them. Facts say the opposite.
No facts don't say the opposite. This isn't about judgement calls like holding or pass interference, this is the Seahawks getting the benefit of repeated "holy sh!t WTF were the refs thinking" calls like these.
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/dave-boling/article38153010.html
Seattle was the most penalized team at least last season, and maybe the year before. Not sure where people get the fantasy that the refs help them. Facts say the opposite.
In fact now it's gotten to the point where they give the teams who play them phantom calls. A couple the announcers literally couldn't figure out what they were based on.
Still bodes well that with a crapton of injuries and hampered by terrible officiating they still almost beat the Aints on the road. Hopefully when they get guys back and Wilson heals they'll finish strong.
No facts don't say the opposite. This isn't about judgement calls like holding or pass interference, this is the Seahawks getting the benefit of repeated "holy sh!t WTF were the refs thinking" calls like these.
http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/dave-boling/article38153010.html
The problem that I see with officiating is that (in the Redskins example I am talking about this week) there is no consistency. When you make ticky tack calls for one team, you need to do it for the other team. If you're going to call OPI on Garcon for barely brushing up against a defender who's already moving that direction, then you can't let AJ Green push off of Norman and not call it. And that is exactly what was happening all game yesterday.
I bet I could dig up a half dozen links on your favorite team. It means crap when the numbers say otherwise.
Penalties were 11-2 yesterday. But I'm sure that had no effect on the outcome.
Can we agree that the refs influence the results of way too many games?
Stop it! it conflicts with their beliefs! Seattle plays hard and pushes the limits, just like the Patriots, and both teams have found great success doing so. Seattle gets penalized the most, possibly gets away with more than others, but it's simply normal because they just play harder than other teams. Here you've got people admitting that holding can be called on nearly every play (which is true), but complaining that only one team doesn't get called for it as much as they should, even though they get called for it more than any other.
If on one had you agree that every team holds on every play, how is it that on the other hand you think it is "unfair" that the most penalized team isn't penalized more?
unbelievable.
The problem that I see with officiating is that (in the Redskins example I am talking about this week) there is no consistency. When you make ticky tack calls for one team, you need to do it for the other team. If you're going to call OPI on Garcon for barely brushing up against a defender who's already moving that direction, then you can't let AJ Green push off of Norman and not call it. And that is exactly what was happening all game yesterday.
Nice to see the Seahacks didn't get the normal ref help st the end of the game.
Is there a new rule I'm not aware of this year about refs calling penalties on a challenge? Green Bay was challenging a spot , refs noticed an Atl player 5 feet short from getting oob and called them for a penalty. Yet they didn't give Atl the time out they called, even when the same video that showed 12 on the field, showed the coach calling s timeout. Everything should be reviewable. Picking what can and can't be is dumb .
And Newton was right in his press conference, he's usually treated differently. Yeah he's a runner a lot and the rules do change when out of the pocket, missing that knee shot is inexcusable. He should be pissed. If it happened to Brady, it'd have been called. The rule is there because of Brady when he got hurt.
This has to be the worst officiated season I've seen. So many terrible and missed calls, and the end of games too.