Ah, Josh Allen's year this year is basically the Cell Saga. As reality eeriely reflects fiction.
He'll lose this season just like Vegeta got to see Trunks killed.
Refs did kind of job the Bills but they had the game won....
I could have sworn there was at least one false start on that final drive. I thought one occured on the second-to-last play. But Allen did get intercepted, and that's all on him.Dang, if even you're saying that about Buffalo, then it's not just my biased opinion. Heh.
If you're referring to the right guard, that dude was false starting all game long and never called.I could have sworn there was at least one false start on that final drive.
Dude these fucking guys are painful!Giants win another squeaker with Tommy DeVito at QB , welfare check on @MrSquished might be needed
You guys are boring. Blue is about pass rushers, not offense or quarterbacks. So destiny has it that Thibedoux will have a partner in sacks.Dude these fucking guys are painful!
I don't want them to tank but just do what we all know you're capable of, losing while still trying to win. Instead you're barely squeaking by absolutely shitty teams in terrible, ugly games, and getting smoked by any decent team. It's not helping lol
You guys are boring. Blue is about pass rushers, not offense or quarterbacks. So destiny has it that Thibedoux will have a partner in sacks.
| QB | Joe Montana | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RB | Roger Craig | |||||
| FB | Tom Rathman | |||||
| WR | Jerry Rice | |||||
| WR | John Taylor | |||||
| TE | Brent Jones | |||||
| LT | Bubba Paris | |||||
| LG | Guy McIntyre | |||||
| C | Jesse Sapolu | |||||
| RG | Harris Barton | |||||
| RT | Steve Wallace | |||||
| Defensive Starters | ||||||
| LDE | Pierce Holt | |||||
| NT | Michael Carter | |||||
| RDE | Kevin Fagan | |||||
| LOLB | Charles Haley | |||||
| LILB | Matt Millen | |||||
| RILB | Keith DeLong | |||||
| ROLB | Bill Romanowski | |||||
| LCB | Darryl Pollard | |||||
| RCB | Don Griffin | |||||
| SS | Chet Brooks | |||||
| FS | Ronnie Lott |
lmfao, what is it with the Steelers and diva receivers lately
Ah, so you agree.Defense was the direct reason (along with a couple "near-miracle" level individual plays) the Giants won their last couple rings. 1990 was 99.9% defense. 1986 was actually a well-rounded team but it had a killer D as well.
Look at the 1990 NFC Championship game vs the "mighty" 49'ers .... that Big Blue took WITHOUT scoring a TD!
1989-90 Niners roster .... that we kept OUT of out the endzone:
QB Joe Montana RB Roger Craig FB Tom Rathman WR Jerry Rice WR John Taylor TE Brent Jones LT Bubba Paris LG Guy McIntyre C Jesse Sapolu RG Harris Barton RT Steve Wallace Defensive Starters LDE Pierce Holt NT Michael Carter RDE Kevin Fagan LOLB Charles Haley LILB Matt Millen RILB Keith DeLong ROLB Bill Romanowski LCB Darryl Pollard RCB Don Griffin SS Chet Brooks FS Ronnie Lott
Ah, so you agree.
How many spycams and comfort women spies did the Giants employ to win that game? I'll bet many a shamrock was ritualistically sacrificed as well.
Your 2000 loss was also a failure to outdefense another defense.
You guys lost the Chase Young sweepstakes...but it came out as win for NY and a literal bust for Washington.
I'm sure Trent Dilfer would be pleased to hear he was much better than Kerry Collins. /sarcasm2000 we got our butts kicked by a MUCH better team. (especially on D AND @ head-coach)
Strangely I think the Giants might have had a chance in that game if they "danced with who brung em" .... in other words if they had stuck to what they were good at rather than trying to out-muscle Baltimore which was never going to work.
Believe it or not I was proud of that Giants NFC Champ team though .... at the time it felt like they overachieved.
I'm sure Trent Dilfer would be pleased to hear he was much better than Kerry Collins. /sarcasm
Not a surprise. You have a guy who doesn't know the playbook and a guy who appears to be a bust.Holy hell that game was AWFUL to watch last night. It was like they had their scout O in for both teams the entire time.
the more Dobbs knows of the playbook the worse he get'sNot a surprise. You have a guy who doesn't know the playbook and a guy who appears to be a bust.
And it might be the Pats who win the tank battle at the end of the season.
Iggles are one of the most vulnerable 10-1 teams I have seen. It's more likely to be something like 27-24, Niners.9ers are favored (last I read 1.5 pts) against the Iggles and the refs at the Linc. I got the Iggles 35, 9ers 24, with the 9ers committing +8 penalties, at least 5 of them resulting in automatic first downs. The Iggles will maybe get 2 penalties called of the 5 yard variety, encroachment or false starts. Who ya got?
Yea my post was more snark about the Eagles being one of the least penalized teams but after doing a bit of research, while they're in the top 5 if being least penalized, they've got more penalties than the Raiders which is just crazy. Realistically I'm pulling for the 9ers obviously and I think it'll be a closer game. 31-28 9ers is my guess.Iggles are one of the most vulnerable 10-1 teams I have seen. It's more likely to be something like 27-24, Niners.
This isn't really true anymore. Vegas uses complex algorithms to determine the betting lines, and different home fields will even have a different value, but none of them are as big as 3 points. It's more like ~1.5 these days.Generally speaking, home team gets +3 points in the calculations. So for the Niners to be favored against the Eagles by 2.5 in some places and 3 in others means that Vegas thinks the Niners are better than the Eagles by 5.5 to 6 points.