MrSquished
Lifer
- Jan 14, 2013
- 25,694
- 24,034
- 136
Lamar Jackson got the message
Would prefer him to go to the other team that plays in MD.Lamar Jackson got the message
Pat Mcafee is insufferable. That said, I don't think it is any secret that good players get beneficial calls more often than average or bad players. Good WRs are more likely to beat the defense and get held or interfered with. Star QBs who can run around in the backfield and evade defenders are more likely to be hit late than average/bad QBs that take the sack right away or throw the ball away, etc etc. This isn't game fixing though.This basically sums up how I feel about the whole Chiefs fix thing. Contains cursing:
Yeah, I can only handle him in small doses. I'm on team LeBatard.Pat Mcafee is insufferable. That said, I don't think it is any secret that good players get beneficial calls more often than average or bad players. Good WRs are more likely to beat the defense and get held or interfered with. Star QBs who can run around in the backfield and evade defenders are more likely to be hit late than average/bad QBs that take the sack right away or throw the ball away, etc etc. This isn't game fixing though.
One other stupid thing I have noticed is that any time a team gets down by 3 scores the announcers start talking like the game is over and how could the losing team ever make it back blah blah blah. Three scores in today's NFL is really not insurmountable.
@pete6032 is more referring to scenarios where there's a lot of game left, and elite offenses can score quickly.With the onside kick neutered, it's a lot more difficult.
For anyone interested, Freakonomics had a great episode on why RBs don't get paid more. Episode 620: https://freakonomics.com/podcast/why-dont-running-backs-get-paid-anymore/
Kinda common sense, market wants a show, and passing gives them that aside from the random long run gains and scores. Interesting none the less.
That was definitely a factor they discussed!Not going to listen but I think it's more because RBs tend to have a short shelf life and teams would rather pay the OL.
Running backs are mostly fungible. Not to say average dudes are like Saquon Barkley or Derrick Henry; but a mid to late round draft pick can give you 70% of the production for pennies on the dollar.That was definitely a factor they discussed!
No doubt, but how often does a RB rush for 2000 yards?Saquon just proved that those elite RB's can certainly help win you a bunch of games. Without him the Eagles are not in the big game.
That's absurdly generous and you must know that. hell, you're probably the first Eagles fan that I've ever known or seen that would ever try to make that claim--at least not without laughing about it, lol.
Pat Mcafee is insufferable. That said, I don't think it is any secret that good players get beneficial calls more often than average or bad players. Good WRs are more likely to beat the defense and get held or interfered with. Star QBs who can run around in the backfield and evade defenders are more likely to be hit late than average/bad QBs that take the sack right away or throw the ball away, etc etc. This isn't game fixing though.
For anyone interested, Freakonomics had a great episode on why RBs don't get paid more. Episode 620: https://freakonomics.com/podcast/why-dont-running-backs-get-paid-anymore/
Kinda common sense, market wants a show, and passing gives them that aside from the random long run gains and scores. Interesting none the less.