Captante
Lifer
- Oct 20, 2003
- 30,333
- 10,842
- 136
No, it's worse than that. He's completely results-oriented about a coach's decision making. If the play succeeds, the coach was right. But if it fails, boy was analytics stoooopid. Bill Belichick was always one of the more aggressive head coaches in the NFL because he had the utmost job security to do whatever the fuck he wants. To even suggest that Beli makes the safe, conventional calls is inaccurate.
Btw, before this game, the Buffalo Bills still ranked very highly in various computer models (See FO DVOA and ESPN FPI). With the win, they're clearly still a big factor in the AFC. Sure, their season has seemed very Jekyll & Hyde, but they have the talent to make a run.
Here's one of the most prominent examples in Belichick's illustrious career.
Ten years ago today, on fourth-and-2, Bill Belichick made one of his most controversial decisions
It was one of the most controversial calls in Patriots history…and it didn’t come from an official. It was Bill Belichick’s decision to go for it on fourth-and-2 in the final minutes against the Indianapolis Colts. And it was 10 years ago today. THE DECISION It remains Belichick’s most...www.nbcsports.com
Nonsense... I'm against going for 2 unless forced to do so and going for it on 4th down only when it makes sense. You and I disagree about when that is.
Belichick makes the SMART calls and this is something I've said consistently even though I dislike him. (intensely!)
Analytics has a place but at the moment in pro-sports its being over-used.
And finally what exactly is your basis for judging something if its not success/failure, (aka: results) oh great oracle?
Last edited: