I dont know if this has been answered somewhere, but which platform would be faster assuming roughly comparable processors? I take it the Intel platform is more expensive but they both feature dual channel DDR memory and 400 mhz FSB's, so why would you pay more for the Intel system?
OK, let me clarify my question. I'm looking to build a midrange system mostly for gaming (not first person shooter type of games tho) and web development. I'd like something in the 2-2.5 Ghz range or equivalent with 1 gig ram and and a mid range video card. No overclocking, don't want a celeron.
The choices I've narrowed it down to are nforce2 system with like a 2200+ CPU or springdale with like an intel 2.2 Ghz. It seems to me from a quick rundown at newegg.com of abit boards and processors that the Intel combo would run at quite a premium? Is the 800Mhz FSB worth the extra money? I haven't seen any online reviews or direct comparisons between the 2 platforms.
Any insight appreciated, TIA.
OK, let me clarify my question. I'm looking to build a midrange system mostly for gaming (not first person shooter type of games tho) and web development. I'd like something in the 2-2.5 Ghz range or equivalent with 1 gig ram and and a mid range video card. No overclocking, don't want a celeron.
The choices I've narrowed it down to are nforce2 system with like a 2200+ CPU or springdale with like an intel 2.2 Ghz. It seems to me from a quick rundown at newegg.com of abit boards and processors that the Intel combo would run at quite a premium? Is the 800Mhz FSB worth the extra money? I haven't seen any online reviews or direct comparisons between the 2 platforms.
Any insight appreciated, TIA.