I would love to hear viable conservative alternatives for all sorts of issues. Unfortunately they almost always place ideology above facts so they end up being magical thinking.
I can't speak for conservatives, but I can speak for myself:
(1) End the war on drugs and treat drug addiction as a medical issue instead of a "prison-rape the addiction out" issue. Estimates vary, but gun murders related to the lucrative and violent black market of the drug trade make up a significant percentage of gun murders. None of which would happen without this black market.
(2) Gun licenses. Similar to a driver license...you must hold a current gun license in order to purchase a gun. The devil is in the details, but there could be such things as criminal background checks, mental health checks, or other qualifications. Once you have a license, it is good for a specified amount of time just like a driver license, at which point you must renew it. Without a license, you can't buy guns.
I think #1 would be the single most effective change in law/thinking/strategy when it comes to reducing gun violence.
Can you provide an example where someone said treating underlying issues of gun murder means ‘tolerate mass murder of school children’? This seems like a pretty clear straw man.
Certainly. Please read and enjoy the following response to someone saying we should treat the underlying issues of gun murder instead of using the ineffective bandaid of rights restriction.:
You absolutely do; to you, dead children are tolerable so long as you get to keep playing with your toys. And sorry, it's not a talking point. I just look at the rest of the world and notice that countries with more sensible gun laws and less gun fetishism
don't have this problem.
^ I think this guy might not be very nice.
What people do say, correctly, is that gun rights people use nebulous ideas like this to resist common sense gun restrictions that research clearly shows are effective.
The truly nebulous idea here is "common sense gun restrictions". What does that mean? How do you do this? What are the scientifically estimated results? Do they outweigh the costs of implementation? How do you make it work in a nation that owns 40-ish percent of all the privately owned guns? Could this fact make solutions different in America than say France?