Nintendo Switch is powered by NVIDIA

Sweepr

Diamond Member
May 12, 2006
5,148
1,142
131
Nvidia is providing the core technology that powers Nintendo's next generation NX console. Multiple sources have confirmed that the new machine is based around Nvidia's mobile-orientated Tegra processor, with development kits currently using the Tegra X1 chip found in the Shield Android TV console and the Google Pixel C tablet.

The news is bound to come as some surprise to those - including ourselves - who suspected that AMD would provide the technology guts to the new Nintendo machine, but what's clear is that the firm is planning to go into a completely new, potentially revolutionary direction. Right now, it is simply not interested in providing hardware that directly competes with PlayStation 4 and Xbox One. It has its own ideas on where to take next-gen gaming.

With that in mind, we can't help but wonder whether X1 is the final hardware we'll see in the NX. Could it actually be a placeholder for Tegra X2? It's a new mobile processor Nvidia has in its arsenal and what's surprising about it is how little we actually know about it. Information on X2 is very limited, to the point where all the technical info we have on it is condensed into one presentation you can read here - 'Embedded Supercomputing at Nvidia' by Alex Ramirez of Nvidia Research. What we do know is that it is a core component of Nvidia's new Drive PX2 system for the automotive industry, where two Tegra X2s are paired with a brace of the firm's discrete GPUs based on the cutting-edge Pascal architecture.

www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-nintendo-nx-mobile-games-machine-powered-by-nvidia-tegra


Since it is being discussed elsewhere, I can say with confidence that Nvidia will announce a Pascal Tegra chip for NX.

https://twitter.com/directfeedgames/status/759072574777196544
www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1254960&page=1


October 20th Update: It's Official - Nintendo Switch is powered by a custom Tegra processor

Nintendo Switch is powered by the performance of the custom Tegra processor. The high-efficiency scalable processor includes an NVIDIA GPU based on the same architecture as the world’s top-performing GeForce gaming graphics cards.

The Nintendo Switch’s gaming experience is also supported by fully custom software, including a revamped physics engine, new libraries, advanced game tools and libraries. NVIDIA additionally created new gaming APIs to fully harness this performance. The newest API, NVN, was built specifically to bring lightweight, fast gaming to the

https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2016/10/20/nintendo-switch
 
Last edited:
Reactions: seecoolguy2

swilli89

Golden Member
Mar 23, 2010
1,558
1,181
136
That is such a shame. Nintendo could have gone X86 for easy porting back and forth for AAA games. Might as well have stayed on the POWER architecture.
 

iiiankiii

Senior member
Apr 4, 2008
759
47
91
The NX is powered by a TEGRA chip? LOL. What a joke. and Nintendo wonder why nobody develop games for them. Don't get me wrong. Nvidia makes fine desktop class gpus; but the Tegra line is one of the worst mobile chips on the market.
 

crisium

Platinum Member
Aug 19, 2001
2,643
615
136
If NX is partly handheld this would make sense. It's the best graphics you can get in mobile, essentially.

But not having x86 makes them, once again, the bane of third party developers. Do they learn nothing? N64 cartridge. Wii underpowered (yes it sold well, but it was a Pyrrhic victory), WiiU underpowered and not x86. All of these were devoid of 3rd party AAA games.
 
Last edited:

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
Odd, for months I was told it was AMD. And that it was going to be x86, going against what even Miyamoto has been saying for over a year.

Nintendo isn't chasing Sony/MSFT. They are catering to their demograph which is stronger on mobile.

Expect an updated Pokemon Go to work on handheld with transferable data to console for online battles.

I'm excited to see what Nintendo comes up with. My prediction was handheld with low settings, then a console with the same hardware but no power restrictions so higher visuals. Don't need to be 4K native with uber graphics to sell. As Pokemon Go is showing, there is still a huge casual market that doesn't need the best graphics to enjoy themselves.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,752
4,562
136
Damn. I'm glad I got a Wii U now for the titles on it I wanted to play that I could not get anywhere else. I'm less and less interested in the prospect of the NX by the month. They should at least have put a 1050 in that thing if they wanted to go with Nvidia.
 

HiroThreading

Member
Apr 25, 2016
173
29
91
HiroThreading said:
...except that AMD is the one that's significantly behind in perf/watt and perf/mm2.

The console deals are negligible compared to the killing that Nvidia makes from Quadro and Tesla.

Also, strategically speaking, the console deals are not set in stone. If Nvidia wishes -- as in, if it deems that AMD's position in the console market is actually threatening -- it could easily meet Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo half way. Pair that up with a cheap Intel quad (Core or Atom based), and hey presto, you've got a potent x86 console.

Who's to say that Nvidia won't TWIMTBP its way through the DX12 era?

You have to stop deluding yourself. AMD needs to beef up its perf/watt and perf/mm2 by an order of a magnitude and it needs to crack into the HPC market and tap into those huge margins.

Consoles, Apple and the RX 480/470/460 wins are good, but the margins are thin and they can easily be negged.

It's exactly as I said -- Nvidia probably made them an offer that they couldn't refuse. Higher perf/watt and perf/mm2, and the more lucrative position that they're in allowed them to do this.

Still, this was a big surprise to me.
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
If NX is partly handheld this would make sense. It's the best graphics you can get in mobile, essentially.

But not having x86 makes them, once again, the bane of third party developers. Do they learn nothing? N64 cartridge. Wii underpowered (yes it sold well, but it was a Pyrrhic victory), WiiU underpowered and not x86. All of these were devoid of 3rd party AAA games.

I assumed the same, but someone said it's easy to port between the two. That chinese console knock off sort of supports it with a lot of PC native games being advertised to work on it. That console is also NV powered.

I honestly don't think Nintendo cares about 3rd parties. They haven't shown any interest in them since the N64 days, if you ask me. People weren't buying Gamecubes for 3rd party titles.
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,752
4,562
136
I was kind of hoping they'd go with Polaris 11. Nvidia must have made them a deal with the belief that it was more important to get their presence back into console space than to maximize profit per unit. They're doing well enough with video cards now that they can offset it while getting console developer more acquainted with their hardware.
 

boozzer

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2012
1,549
18
81
I assumed the same, but someone said it's easy to port between the two. That chinese console knock off sort of supports it with a lot of PC native games being advertised to work on it. That console is also NV powered.

I honestly don't think Nintendo cares about 3rd parties. They haven't shown any interest in them since the N64 days, if you ask me. People weren't buying Gamecubes for 3rd party titles.
that is the same as not liking money as a business.
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
so does this mean nintendo is leaving the home console business?

Why? They just aren't chasing Sony/MSFT into million dollar R&Ds and lost-leader tactics. Nintendo sells for profits day 1. MSFT's gaming division is still a billion in the whole, Xbone failed to catch on like 360 did and MSFT is basically cutting it's loses and trying to win back the PC-Market with it's cross-platform initative.

Sony is basically kept afloat by it's gaming division which only the recent success of the PS4 kept it from going under completely. (PSVita - dead, PSTV - dead, PS Go - basically on life support).


I predicted Xbox tying PC+Console from the start, they waited almost 2 years and now it's catching on. I predict Nintendo to tie console+handheld from the start. Buy one game, play it on both.

However, if AMD is in the next console, I expect an ARM processor too. Nintendo has been vocal about integrating their mobile and console business.

Nintendo seems to make a killing selling software. And their software library is segmented by their platforms. They have to development multi-versions of the same game. This is why Miyamoto said he wanted to unify them. I'm taking the leap claiming they'll sell perhaps one license usable on both platforms.

Pros of moving to unified platform:
lower dev costs for games while supporting two joint platforms
sell at profits from day 1 as console/handheld might have similar parts if not exact, just console won't have power limitations thus render higher resolution+higher frame rate
promote the sale of both platforms by allowing game licenses to work on both with one purchase

But that's me thinking out loud.
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
that is the same as not liking money as a business.

Yeah makes absolutely no sense. They shoulda just released a home console based on Polaris 11 or 10, then a new Gameboy with this Tegra chipset.

I get you two are camp AMD, but you guys aren't looking at what Nintendo could possibly do.

A unified platform would benefit them greatly. Most of their best sellers are handheld games, which aren't graphically demanding.

Allowing users to play said games on a home console (sold separately, at a moderate price since the hardware won't be OMG 4k@60FPS) is just going to enhanced that for their player base.

With most console titles hitting PC, it is most likely Nintendo wants to be the go-to mobile device (as they've basically been regarded as due to lacking Wii U exclusives).

Have a PC+Nintendo NX, or PS4+Nintendo NX, or Xbone+Nintendo NX. They don't need to dominate Sony/MSFT. They will do just find selling their platform exclusive games.

Again, Pokemon sold 10 million copies. That beats any AAA-title multi-plat and the budget was most likely a small fraction in the process.
 

boozzer

Golden Member
Jan 12, 2012
1,549
18
81
I get you two are camp AMD, but you guys aren't looking at what Nintendo could possibly do.

A unified platform would benefit them greatly. Most of their best sellers are handheld games, which aren't graphically demanding.

Allowing users to play said games on a home console (sold separately, at a moderate price since the hardware won't be OMG 4k@60FPS) is just going to enhanced that for their player base.

With most console titles hitting PC, it is most likely Nintendo wants to be the go-to mobile device (as they've basically been regarded as due to lacking Wii U exclusives).

Have a PC+Nintendo NX, or PS4+Nintendo NX, or Xbone+Nintendo NX. They don't need to dominate Sony/MSFT. They will do just find selling their platform exclusive games.

Again, Pokemon sold 10 million copies. That beats any AAA-title multi-plat and the budget was most likely a small fraction in the process.
your post could have gone a hell of alot better without this
 

Stuka87

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2010
6,240
2,559
136
What a total shame. This pretty much guarantees that there will be little to no AAA 3rd party games released for the NX. This is very disappointing as I was really planning on buying an NX.

NX being powered by a tegra chip is just so meh. This was Nintendo's chance to at least get up to being on par with the current PS4/Xbox1. Now they will still be left in the dust.
 

Dribble

Platinum Member
Aug 9, 2005
2,076
611
136
Don't know why this would be powered by a tegra X2, that's just a test board for the auto industry? It's probably not powered by an X1 either as that's an old chip. It'll have whatever the next gen tegra is. Almost certainly it'll be amazingly powerful for a mobile arm soc but still no match for the new consoles.
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
Woah, that was unexpected.
<snip>

The cost of kits and mods to play some good handheld games on a large screen are money Nintendo could have been pocketing for years.

The last time they supported a similar function was with the Gameboy adapter for Gamecube.
 

positivedoppler

Golden Member
Apr 30, 2012
1,112
174
106
Ouch, I really hope this works out for Nintendo. Hate to see them go the way of Sega. Mobile is already flooded with increasingly more power cellphones that has a 2 years upgrade cycle tied to carrier contracts. Hopefully Nintendo can pull a rabbit out of the hat and the hardware will have VR capability.
 

Sweepr

Diamond Member
May 12, 2006
5,148
1,142
131
Don't know why this would be powered by a tegra X2, that's just a test board for the auto industry? It's probably not powered by an X1 either as that's an old chip. It'll have whatever the next gen tegra is. Almost certainly it'll be amazingly powerful for a mobile arm soc but still no match for the new consoles.

You're correct. Let's not forget first Xbox 360 devkits were powered by G5 + R420. A custom Tegra based on Pascal (512 SPs+) would pack quite a punch, probably enough to receive 3rd party ports.
 

Stuka87

Diamond Member
Dec 10, 2010
6,240
2,559
136
You're correct. Let's not forget first Xbox 360 devkits were powered by G5 + R420. A custom Tegra based on Pascal (512 SPs+) would pack quite a punch, probably enough to receive 3rd party ports.

I would not bet on this. Porting, and then redoing all your optimizations for an entirely different CPU and GPU architecture is not something many companies will be interested in.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,209
50
91
What a total shame. This pretty much guarantees that there will be little to no AAA 3rd party games released for the NX. This is very disappointing as I was really planning on buying an NX.

NX being powered by a tegra chip is just so meh. This was Nintendo's chance to at least get up to being on par with the current PS4/Xbox1. Now they will still be left in the dust.

Didnt somebody just say it was easy to port?
And why is Tegra meh? It will likely be either pascal or volta based. Is there a problem with that other than it not being AMD?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |