no 127.0.0.1 ping!

lbmcleod

Senior member
Jan 30, 2002
210
0
0
ok i have a computer that i want to setup on the network (WORKGROUP). i have a cable router/dhcp server (192.168.0.1) and a switch which are both working fine. The dhcp server shows the computer as 192.168.0.5. the computer connects to the internet through the LAN, and pings 192.168.0.1 but does not ping any other computer on the network and the loopback address of 127.0.0.1 also always times out. it will not connect to the workgroup through network places or anything. ive done the windows xp network setup wizard, setup the gateway as 192.168.0.1

any ideas?

thanks
 

gunrunnerjohn

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2002
1,360
0
0
Look at the contents of the HOSTS file located in \WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\DRIVERS\ETC. It should have a line that reads:

127.0.0.1 localhost

If not, put one in there.
 

lbmcleod

Senior member
Jan 30, 2002
210
0
0
it was the norton internet security stopping workgroup connection - i can get into workgroup without any errors, and ping 127.0.0.1 now and ping 192.168.0.4 (another computer on network) however i cant view any workgroup computers (workgroup view is empty)
 

lbmcleod

Senior member
Jan 30, 2002
210
0
0
duh wrong workgroup



soz for wasting neones time whos read this, on another note though, anyone got any good tutorials on how to configure norton internet security?
 

mboy

Diamond Member
Jul 29, 2001
3,309
0
0
Originally posted by: gunrunnerjohn
My RX for workgroup browsing issues is normally to install NETBEUI protocol all around.

No offense, but that is just a crutch. Much better off to find out why it isn't working right in the 1st place.
 

gunrunnerjohn

Golden Member
Nov 2, 2002
1,360
0
0
Originally posted by: mboy
Originally posted by: gunrunnerjohn My RX for workgroup browsing issues is normally to install NETBEUI protocol all around.
No offense, but that is just a crutch. Much better off to find out why it isn't working right in the 1st place.

No offence taken, but the reason I use NETBEUI is that it works. Since even Microsoft can't give a definitive answer to the question of reliable workgroup browsing, it's certainly the easy way to fix the problem.

The fragile browser election kludge that is used for workgroup browsing can be upset just by booting in a different sequence. Networks that have worked for months will suddenly not be able to find all the machines in Network Neighborhood, even though a named connection can still be made. NETBEUI solves this issue in almost all cases with no measurable downside, why not use it?
 

mboy

Diamond Member
Jul 29, 2001
3,309
0
0
Never had any issues on my workgroup and none like that on my NT 4 domain running XP.
 

ClearToLand

Member
Jul 9, 2001
90
0
0
Originally posted by: gunrunnerjohn
Look at the contents of the HOSTS file located in \WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\DRIVERS\ETC. It should have a line that reads:

127.0.0.1 localhost

If not, put one in there.
All that would have accomplished is to create a local DNS-type entry for localhost which would translate to 127.0.0.1 and still fail (if PINGing 127.0.0.1 was failing). The "usual" reason for this is some component of the TCP/IP protocol got "stepped on" and it needs to be uninstalled/re-installed.

 

buleyb

Golden Member
Aug 12, 2002
1,301
0
0
Originally posted by: mboy
Never had any issues on my workgroup and none like that on my NT 4 domain running XP.

Agreed, netbeui is nice for some real mismatch networks, with older clients, but I have never had an issue getting 2k/XP working in a fairly homogeneous network.

I'm sitting in a network with XP, 2k, NT, 98, Linux, Solaris, and VxWorks, running off a Samba-fied NT domain, with a bridge to NFS shares...

if this network can succeed, a few XP pro machines can get by...
 

martind1

Senior member
Jul 3, 2003
777
0
0
Originally posted by: buleyb
Originally posted by: mboy
Never had any issues on my workgroup and none like that on my NT 4 domain running XP.

Agreed, netbeui is nice for some real mismatch networks, with older clients, but I have never had an issue getting 2k/XP working in a fairly homogeneous network.

I'm sitting in a network with XP, 2k, NT, 98, Linux, Solaris, and VxWorks, running off a Samba-fied NT domain, with a bridge to NFS shares...

if this network can succeed, a few XP pro machines can get by...

are you trying to impress us or something?

My network has all the above AND aix and hp machine. So There.

Plus I am way more handsom. You mom said so too.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |