DavidE. Martin testifies at the German Corona Inquiry Committee July 9th,2021
That video is the most idiotic thing I have ever listened to. I can't imagine anyone listening to that and not seeing the obvious intentional mistakes he is making over and over again.
1. He constantly conflates the originally recognized coronavirus, and the specific iteration of COVID-19, and ignores the mountains of evidence and research showing that they are distinctly different. He conflates the research into treatment for the first and pretends that it applies to COVID-19. Here's a question: if we knew how to cure coronavirus, why did millions of people die to this pandemic? Oh yeah, because COVID-19 is distinctly different. Different treatments. Different infectious capabilities. Different mortality rate.
2. He has the audacity to say that 'Anthony Fauci financed research to create the coronavirus' when, of course, he did no such thing. He read one inflammatory research title which had nothing to do with creating the virus (which already existed, obviously), and decided to go after one of the leading experts on infectious desease. He even says that 'we' created the coronavirus. Did he think that infectious desease scientists don't study existing viruses?
3. He again talks in generalities, saying that there are all of these patents published from 2008-2019 that specifically discuss modifying the virus to include features found in COVID-19. Oh, so now we are to take his word that he discovered all of these patents showing COVID-19 is a manufactured virus, but somehow NO ONE ELSE has pointed this out? No other experts in the field have NOTICED that we PATENTED creating COVID-19? Sorry, but that defies any semblance of truth. Why hasn't he published all of this information? It would obviously make us accountable for the pandemic! Right? Just ignore all of the peer reviewed studies into COVID and take him at his word that HE has found out this truth, and which patents are those that show we developed the virus/well we won't talk about any specific patents, just say that they are there, right?
4. He quotes a very normal person who says that we need more research into the coronavirus from 2017, and makes the allusion that the person was talking about creating a pandemic, not developing a treatment for the already existing coronavirus. Only someone who already believes there is a conspiracy afoot would read into a quote like that and think it has anything to do with creating a pandemic and not developing a better treatment for the already existing virus. (30 minutes)
5. He has some problem with the NIH appropriating the right to research a coronavirus vaccine in 2019, after just saying that it was their right under US law. Here's a hint, if the pandemic were a planned operation they wouldn't have needed the patent in 2019, because the vaccine would have been ready to go.
6. He has some problem with Moderna amending some patents in March 2019 pertaining to Coronavirus vaccines. Here's a hint, Moderna has been doing research into coronaviruses (and many other viruses) for a long time, and is constantly filing patents relating to their research into virus treatments and vaccines. So I guess a corporation doing what it already was doing, what it has been doing for a long time, now means that the pandemic was a conspiracy.
He doesn't understand that the CDC, the NIH, and big pharmaceutical companies are doing research into treatment and vaccines all the time. Everything he brings up was already known, and the specific evidence that he thinks proves COVID-19 was a manufactured virus was of course for his eyes only.
He's a quack. Very obviously. He presented no evidence of specific acts that would prove his claims, but instead just brings up interesting circumstances-circumstances that go on ALL THE TIME in this field. He of course can't prove anything.
And then the panel goes on into more conspiracy theories, such as saying that COVID is a 'population control' tool. Serious people don't talk about such things. Serious people would ASK HIM FOR HIS EVIDENCE instead of listening to him and accepting him at face value.
He says that the COVID-19 vaccine is a 'pathogen stimulating' treatment (51 minutes). I'm sorry, what? Of course, it only makes sense to a conspiracy theorist that the vaccine that has saved countless lives somehow is 'pathogen stimulating'.
53 minutes-he says 'there is no such thing as different variants of COVID-19'. WHAT? He is OBVIOUSLY WRONG. What is WRONG with his brain? Of course there has been documentation of different variants of COVID-19. I could link literally dozens of peer reviewed studies showing the different variants. We have in this thread statistical analysis of the effectiveness of the vaccine against different variants.
I can't take any more. He is spreading conspiracy theories, that are obviously false. He has presented no EVIDENCE of his claims. And this panel just takes him as an expert at his word without any requests for evidence.