Declarations of war require congressional approval. He wouldn't be covered under any existing authorizations of force.
Declarations of war require congressional approval. He wouldn't be covered under any existing authorizations of force.
The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30-day withdrawal period, without a Congressional authorization for use of military force (AUMF) or a declaration of war by the United States. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding the veto of the bill from President Nixon.
The War Powers Resolution is likely un-Constitutional as it conferred to the President powers clearly granted to Congress under Article 1, Section 8. Under the guise of limiting Presidential power, the War Powers Resolution does the exact opposite.
President Dumbass needs to STFU. It's situations like this that terrify me that he is in that office surrounded by people he only wants to agree with him and tell him he's the bestest ever.
I'm sure Dennis Rodman would accept an Ambassadorship to North Korea, if asked ....
Based on what actions he's done in the past?
NK just released an official threat so the ball is back in Trump's court.
it just happened, so i can't find a copy yet.
In a statement today, Gen. Kim Rak Gyom, commander of the Strategic Force of the Korean People's Army, said Trump's comments warning of "fire and fury" fail to grasp the ongoing situation, calling the U.S. president a "guy bereft of reason."
"[O]nly absolute force can work on him," the statement reads.
How do you know there's zero threat if he gets nukes capable of being put on missiles? I think it's more likely he'd try to grab concessions from the West once achieved, but I wouldn't say there's zero threat to US.
The Democrats are a lot of times feckless when it comes to foreign policy. Many of them give signals they'll do nothing militarily, so North Korea is embolden to take the chance. If Trump administration's rhetoric (though stupid of Donnie to draw a red line on threats) doesn't get them to come to the table, sanctions that have no chance and don't have the purpose of crippling the regime certainly won't. I mean, those are the same guys who were scared ****less over exposing Russia during the elections because they thought Russia would retaliate by screwing with our power plants and stuff.
“The idea that Kim Jong Un’s decisions, particularly about his nuclear weapons program, are irrational is a myth,” Town said.
I see stuff like this all the time. It basically says the US will do nothing then.
How do you know there's zero threat if he gets nukes capable of being put on missiles? I think it's more likely he'd try to grab concessions from the West once achieved, but I wouldn't say there's zero threat to US.
The Democrats are a lot of times feckless when it comes to foreign policy. Many of them give signals they'll do nothing militarily, so North Korea is embolden to take the chance. If Trump administration's rhetoric (though stupid of Donnie to draw a red line on threats) doesn't get them to come to the table, sanctions that have no chance and don't have the purpose of crippling the regime certainly won't. I mean, those are the same guys who were scared ****less over exposing Russia during the elections because they thought Russia would retaliate by screwing with our power plants and stuff.
“The idea that Kim Jong Un’s decisions, particularly about his nuclear weapons program, are irrational is a myth,” Town said.
I see stuff like this all the time. It basically says the US will do nothing then.
NK just released an official threat so the ball is back in Trump's court.
it just happened, so i can't find a copy yet.
So, to answer my question, your answer is he hasn't done anything except tough talk. Got it. Now stop being a scared shitless pussy.
Also, just an fyi, north Korea =/= Russia. Russia has a history, north Korea does not.
Bin Laden agrees with you. Oh yeah, that's right. He's dead.
I mean, those are the same guys who were scared ****less over exposing Russia during the elections because they thought Russia would retaliate by screwing with our power plants and stuff.
I don't suppose you can substantiate that slur....
It was in a long article weeks back. There were other reasons such as cowering to McConnell and wanting to protect his "legacy". Sorry, but he was feckless in a lot of ways.
I'm not scared. lol So your idea of doing something is bull*** diplomacy where you already admit to Kim you'll do nothing? Why would he come to the table for what you want then? You're probably one of those guys who also thinks since the US has nukes, anyone else should to. And that it doesn't matter if proliferation is rampant.
Huh? Putin is less rational than the punk kid? Also, talk about being a pussy if you agreed with their assessment that they should cower to Russia over them blatantly meddling in the election.
Bin Laden shows little. You might as well add all the drone strikes he approved of.
So, the answer is that you can't substantiate it & have shifted slurs....
Lol, it's not like economic sanctions have ever worked against a foreign power that we view as an adversary.
Do you even history bro? Lol, freaken idiots.
The next big step is getting it to survive re-entry.