The movie felt to me like it was done by a wannabe undergrad "auteur" who thought he could make a Tarantino film.
It felt, like the other QT films I haven't been head over heels about, like a bunch of punchy set pieces, each meticulously and even lovingly done "over the top" for effect, but with NO unifying story really undergirding them . . . just a lackluster attempt at same.
Now, I realize I've dissed QT before, so I'd like to add that I loved, loved, loved Reservoir Dogs, and that Pulp Fiction is an all-time masterpiece, imho.
The wooden carving of Jesus Christ on the cross at the opening of
The Hateful Eight: I knew it would be a subtle story telling device. The camera dwelled on it for so long, barely moving until it's in the right position for the carriage driving by. Kicked-up snow swirls right at the camera.
That opening shot was incredibly long, with no cuts. At 70mm and 24 frames per-second, that's 1.68 meters of film per-second! I wonder just how many meters of film were used for the opening? If anything screwed-up the shot, they'd have to re-shoot...and that would be incredibly expensive.
The carved statue serves a purpose. It shows relative time as multiple parties pass it and you see varying amounts of snow or day/night. I love it.
The flashback was amazing. The best use of such a storytelling device I can ever recall.
The gore was shocking and horrifying. Quentin Tarantino wants me to be uncomfortable, and he succeeds again and again in this movie.
It's obvious that the screenplay spent some time being developed as a stage production, but I feel it made the story even more compelling. I hope they actually make a stage version. The film will remain special to me.