DigDog
Lifer
- Jun 3, 2011
- 13,622
- 2,189
- 126
I'm scrathcing my head because i watched Brian DePalma's awful The Black Dahlia - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387877/?ref_=tt_urv
How do you take a story by James Ellroy, with Hillary Swank and Scarlett Johansson, directed by the guy who did The Untouchables, and somehow come up with this shit?
Obviously The Black Dahlia is the story of "the black dahlia", a corpse found mangled in 1947 Los Angeles, but is also the story of two police officers, both of which are ..boxers?? , and for some weird reason this is a major plot point. Josh Hartnett is the young cop who clearly is embarrassed by the hotness of Johansson, who plays the wife of other cop, played by Aaron Eckhart. Hartnett is excellent in using subtle body language to show he's repressing his attraction to Johansson, which is another thing that is weird about this film - everyone in it is good. The acting is good across the board, the costumes and sets - despite a few anachronisms - are good, the story should be easy enough to adapt into a workable film, but it's so confused, so long and aimless, i genuinely do not understand what the film is trying to tell me.
Look, you NEED a film to railroad you through a story. That's just how it works. Shrek didn't stop halfway to do his taxes, and there is no hockey championship in Se7en.
The information that makes up the story needs to be sized up or down according to the importance of that character in the plot, and instead here we get people just talking and talking and talking and, because they get the same screen treatment as a protagonist, i genuinely do not know if i'm watching a filler segment, how much of the scene is relevant to the plot, or if i need to remember any of it. I have now tried watching this film 3 times, as the first two i just couldn't understand what was going on.
I don't know, maybe this is one of those masturbatory exercises where a director expects you to memorize a script just to enjoy the film. I was expecting better from DePalma.
my vote: 5.5/10 - what a horrible confusing mess, not even worth it for Scarlett.
How do you take a story by James Ellroy, with Hillary Swank and Scarlett Johansson, directed by the guy who did The Untouchables, and somehow come up with this shit?
Obviously The Black Dahlia is the story of "the black dahlia", a corpse found mangled in 1947 Los Angeles, but is also the story of two police officers, both of which are ..boxers?? , and for some weird reason this is a major plot point. Josh Hartnett is the young cop who clearly is embarrassed by the hotness of Johansson, who plays the wife of other cop, played by Aaron Eckhart. Hartnett is excellent in using subtle body language to show he's repressing his attraction to Johansson, which is another thing that is weird about this film - everyone in it is good. The acting is good across the board, the costumes and sets - despite a few anachronisms - are good, the story should be easy enough to adapt into a workable film, but it's so confused, so long and aimless, i genuinely do not understand what the film is trying to tell me.
Look, you NEED a film to railroad you through a story. That's just how it works. Shrek didn't stop halfway to do his taxes, and there is no hockey championship in Se7en.
The information that makes up the story needs to be sized up or down according to the importance of that character in the plot, and instead here we get people just talking and talking and talking and, because they get the same screen treatment as a protagonist, i genuinely do not know if i'm watching a filler segment, how much of the scene is relevant to the plot, or if i need to remember any of it. I have now tried watching this film 3 times, as the first two i just couldn't understand what was going on.
I don't know, maybe this is one of those masturbatory exercises where a director expects you to memorize a script just to enjoy the film. I was expecting better from DePalma.
my vote: 5.5/10 - what a horrible confusing mess, not even worth it for Scarlett.