NOW CLOSED ; List some movies you've watched recently. Theatre, rental, TV... and give a */10

Page 577 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Bubbleawsome

Diamond Member
Apr 14, 2013
4,833
1,204
146
I never liked Power Rangers even a little. I was the target age group when it came out, but I absolutely hated it and hated that my friends liked it.

A guy where I work was a huge Power Rangers fan as a kid. He hated the new movie and told everyone not to watch it.

I'm confused.
I never watched it, but The people I watched the movie with had watched the power rangers. All of us liked it.
 

Feneant2

Golden Member
May 26, 2004
1,418
30
91
Jack Reacher, Never go Back - 2/10. If I had remembered they brought in a teenager actress I would have juts have gouged by eyes out. The movie is nothing like the first one, which was very good. Here people just get randomly killed but for everyone in the movie it feels like a 'Ho-hum' moment, typical day, multiple cops, guys getting left injured/dead on airplanes, in their houses, etc.

We stopped watching after an hour after the ending was given away.
As soon as they showed Turner giving the girl a pointer on how to take away someone's gun, I told my wife that's how the movie would end- which Google confirmed. Idiotic writing, Reacher and the Assassin have enough moves to take out the Terminator but yet a random teenager can take away his gun just like that.
. I've read a lot of Lee Child novels, this is probably the worst one to make a movie out of and I figure it was so badly received as to be the last.
 

Ackmed

Diamond Member
Oct 1, 2003
8,478
524
126
David Chappell on Netflix 9/10. I should note that the second one is much more funny that the first, in Austin Texas. This should be common sense, but those easily offended don't watch. Like most comedians, he makes jokes involving several kinds of people, blacks, whites, gays, fatties, etc. I laughed hard many times, wife and I really enjoyed it. Also, it claimed 4K, but sure didn't look like it to me.
 
Reactions: clamum

Ichinisan

Lifer
Oct 9, 2002
28,298
1,234
136
David Chappell on Netflix 9/10. I should note that the second one is much more funny that the first, in Austin Texas. This should be common sense, but those easily offended don't watch. Like most comedians, he makes jokes involving several kinds of people, blacks, whites, gays, fatties, etc. I laughed hard many times, wife and I really enjoyed it. Also, it claimed 4K, but sure didn't look like it to me.
A lot of requirements for 4K

- The right TV
- The right streaming device
- The right Netflix service tier
- The right ISP. Yeah. The ISP must have this box that stores tons of Netflix content. Most ISPs get that because it greatly reduces bandwidth between their network and Netflix servers.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
30,160
3,302
126
David Chappell on Netflix 9/10. I should note that the second one is much more funny that the first, in Austin Texas. This should be common sense, but those easily offended don't watch. Like most comedians, he makes jokes involving several kinds of people, blacks, whites, gays, fatties, etc. I laughed hard many times, wife and I really enjoyed it. Also, it claimed 4K, but sure didn't look like it to me.
didn't think 'deep in heart of texas' was that funny. 6/10
have yet to watch 'age of spin'
 

Tequila

Senior member
Oct 24, 1999
882
11
76
Life: 8/10. Saw the IMAX show today and it was pretty good. A bit of an Alien ripoff but worth watching and has a great ending.
 
Reactions: Thebobo

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
52,931
5,803
126
I watched both of the Chappelle things yesterday and thought they were both hilarious. I was just upset because I thought I heard there were 3 specials but I only saw 2. I wanted more after watching the first 2.
 

Ackmed

Diamond Member
Oct 1, 2003
8,478
524
126
A lot of requirements for 4K

- The right TV
- The right streaming device
- The right Netflix service tier
- The right ISP. Yeah. The ISP must have this box that stores tons of Netflix content. Most ISPs get that because it greatly reduces bandwidth between their network and Netflix servers.

Yes there are a lot of requirements. I have a 4K TV, LG 65" OLED. I have Direct with 4K boxes, the correct Netflix tier, and AT&T gigapower where I think my average was like 960mb/sec last I checked. Other shows on Netflix look fantastic and you can tell they are 4K. It just didn't look as good as other listings that they have for 4K.

Direct TV just announced 25 MLB games in 4K, so I am excited about that. Be far more excited when its football though.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Kaido

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
30,160
3,302
126
didn't think 'deep in heart of texas' was that funny. 6/10
have yet to watch 'age of spin'
'Age of Spin' is hilarious! 9/10

Heart of Texas was in 2015.
Age of spin was in 2016.

Dave chapelle VASTLY improved in that year's time
 

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
33,929
1,098
126
Batman (1989) - 7/10 - For what it was, it wasn't bad. I just had to keep saying to myself "It's the 80s. It's the 80s."

Live Free and Die Hard - 8/10 - I'm a sucker for these kinds of movies, so I liked it.

Mad Max Fury Road - 6/10 - This was my first Mad Max movie. It wasn't bad, but I'm not sure what the hell I just watched.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
30,160
3,302
126
Goliath on Amazon Prime is frigging epic.

Billy Bob Thorton is killing this role.
And that awkward girl from Malcolm in the Middle (long curly black hair) is in it and hot damn, she grew up! Great frigging eye-candy.

Yup her (SPOILER: she's in a bikini in attleast one scene that had no purpose other than to put her in a bikini):
https://www.google.com/search?q=Tan...-Address&ie=&oe=&safe=active&gws_rd=ssl#spf=1
apparently Tania Raymonde's crotch tattoo is real and not just for the Chainsaw movie:
https://gfycat.com/FlakySillyBandicoot (nsfw)

she has the same tat in Goliath
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
37,851
8,312
136
Knight of Cups (Terrence Mallick, 2016) 4.5/10

Saw tonight. One of those movies where I had to try to make myself accept it on its own terms. Even so, IMO it's pretentious at times, poetic a lot of the time, but aimless and just prevails upon the patience of the "viewer," and that's in spades. Christian Bale, 99% of the time has zero expression. He's a good enough looking fellow, all the girls he has flings with are fashion magazine worthy beauties, and the ones whose bodies you see are Playboy worthy. Whooptie doo. I mean, real life anyone? Bale is the protagonist, well, the center of everything all the time, you hear that he's worked hard to become a successful Hollywood writer making a ton of money but you never see him doing a lick of work of any kind... zero. He spends his life either having flings with stunning chicks (fucking them all, you presume), or drifting about in magnificent surroundings, super expensive homes or beautiful outdoors places or museums or showy aquariums or Las Vegas strip joint scenes such as you can't imagine but Mallick can find somehow. All the time, while he's leading this manifestly enviable existence he has this internal dialog (you hear it very often throughout the film) in which he is questioning if his life has any meaning. This fills all 118 minutes and it ends suddenly and to me with zero warning. I watched the 16 minute making-of and it was revealing of Mallick's methods.

There was no script, no plot (I realized that very early on), it brings to mind Altman, the Koyanisqatsi trilogy...

Really, I was yawning by the end. He had actors make up stuff on the spot, dialog, action, they shot a lot and kept what worked, put it all together ACDBKF... like that.

I had the thought that it could have been 5x better if they had some coherent plot, some scripted dialog. Some scenes (many) were pretty amazing, well, some. The party scene outside with seemingly 100+ characters. Mallick had many very experienced actors and many who really had zero experience and others in between. You could tell that a lot of stuff was people acting, not acting real, just acting, because that's what they were instructed to do... go out there and riff, act, riff off what the actor next to you is doing (i.e. say what comes to mind), etc. etc. As a method of making a movie, well, IMO that doesn't work. However, yeah, the actors were very very good looking, the sets they were on were stunning, so people forgive because of those things.

I watched the DVD. I wonder if there's a BR that's really superior. The quality of the cinematography was defintely stunning a lot of the time, so that aspect of the movie would really come through a lot better in a great BR. However a lot of the movie was shot with relatively inferior media, I think. They used a lot of different type equipment, GoPto, film, digital, probably some low res hand held stuff, they just winged it, winged it, winged it.

Where was it going? His family was fucked. FUCKED! One brother apparently suicided, the other was a wack job who had major violence issues, destroying things, attacking people almost. The father was a wacko old man full of confusion, doubt, zero wisdom, rambled on and on and had almost zero vitality to boot. I got tired of looking at Bale! His face was a focus soooooo much of the time.
 
Last edited:

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,135
2,445
126
Right now, I'm watching Samurai Gourmet on Netflix. Fascinatingly odd Japanese show... it's like they redid Jiro Dreams Of Sushi in sitcom form

8/10, unless you hate shows with subtitles.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
52,931
5,803
126
Passengers - 5 or 6/10 - didn't realize this shit was a love story and thought it was more sci-fi than it was. I liked the whole premise though. I think it ended pretty stupid too.
 

angminas

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2006
3,331
26
91
Spoilers.

John Wick - 5/10. It was okay, and some parts were good, but overall the most overrated movie I've seen since TDK. Dialogue was cheesy, especially when they were trying to scare me with how badass Wick was. The whole movie fails if we don't believe in Wick's depth of feeling, and I didn't...Reeves is an okay actor, but he barely acted at all. Russian boss was a complete moron in everything he did. Everybody kept doing stupid shit in the firefights. Wick is such a badass, but he can barely take a slender woman in hand-to-hand combat? Come on.

Interstellar - 6/10. Also highly overrated. Everything I've seen by Nolan is far more impressive than good. They're usually chock full of stuff that barely makes sense and/or is barely explained. He can shake the bookcase and drop books, and it's the only way to save his daughter's life, but he just drops a book or two here and there, then heads to a different year? She knows everyone will die if she doesn't find out what's in that room, so she picks a nasty fight with her brother who owns the house? Dude leads him to the edge of a cliff and pulls out his comm chip, and he just stands there? Dude is cracking his glass helmet, so he appeals to the guy with probability instead of getting up or pressing their helmets together so dude can't get momentum? The hybernation pods are reusable, so when they wake up dude, why does it tear down the middle? It's cold enough to freeze clouds, but they don't realize that before they enter the atmosphere? And on and on and on. Dialogue was too quiet - I had to turn it way up, and then I got blasted out of my chair every time something dramatic happened, because the audience apparently needs extreme help knowing when something's important. I ended up turning on subtitles. Glad I didn't buy it.

Spider-Man 3 - 6/10. Better than I'd heard. It was more of a comic book on the screen than a movie, which I was fine with, since it did the comic book stuff pretty well. The villains were more on his level of competency than in the first two movies. Those versions of Green Goblin and Doc Ock were both vastly more dangerous than this trilogy's Spider-Man, and their defeats felt forced and unsatisfying to me. The part where the black suit changed his personality was entertaining.
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
30,160
3,302
126
Goliath 9/10 till the last 2 episodes then WTF/10

it's an Amazon original starring billy bob thorton.

I thought it was great till the last 2 episodes then PLOT HOLES galore.

it was like the writers were told to add more drama after most of the episodes were shot.
so they had to shoehorn some stupid stuff in there.

- what does the hooker's (Brittney) testimony have to do with the case?

- why does she betray billy in the 1st place?
she claims legal troubles but why couldn't she ask billy for help, since he is a lawyer?!

- What does the cop do with Brittney after he stops her and throws her to ground?
she looked fine in the next scene and Britney doesn't mention the stop/roughing up to billy.

- what happened to Britney after the trial?
NO CLOSURE

- Who killed that DEA informant karl stolz and put him into the trunk of billys car?
 

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,135
2,445
126
I'm also watching Black Mirror on Netflix, which is like a modern adaptation of the Twilight Zone. I'd give it a 7/10 to a 9/10 depending on the episode, because each one is a separate story.

Oddly enough, the first episode of each season seems to be the best.
 

DigDog

Lifer
Jun 3, 2011
13,622
2,189
126
i watched Hidden Figures - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4846340/reference

Let's get out of the way the main bugbear: Hidden Figures does try to
make the "struggle" more real than it was. I don't blame them, it makes
for a good story and while in theory, this film doesn't need to add
inaccuracies, it would otherwise be hard to include how radical this
was at the time. We wouldn't want the film to pretend everything was
fine and dandy when both women and blacks instead faced a struggle
against racial and sexual discrimination.

So, i found Hidden Figures to be a really good film. The main plot is
about two, separate, black women who wind up working in the most
important sectors of Project Mercury. They face difficulties due to the
racial segregation in place at the time (although the film doesn't
hammer on this, fortunately) and to their being women, all topped with
some good ol' bureaucracy for extra difficulty. Through their
intelligence and hard work, they manage to contribute significantly to
the mission and mark a milestone in Aerospace flight, racial equality,
and women's suffrage, all in one go.

Taraji Henson, who plays Katherine, has the more interesting role; she
"fights The Man" in key scene, and is the one who is has the most
success. She has also some "real life" scenes which do not hurt the
development of the film.

Octavia Spencer, who plays Dorothy, has a smaller role, but she does a
fantastic job with what little she has, often getting more out of a
stare or some timid silence than most of the white cast.

The overtly-beloved Jim Parson plays the same identical character as he
does in Big Bang Theory because he isn't capable of doing otherwise.

Kevin Costner dominates his role, which unfortunately, due to annoying
things such as realism and historical accuracy, is too small for a
massive actor such as him.

The film does kind of drag on towards the end, and for some idiotic
reason starts to play the "victory sequence" complete with heroic
fanfare when the spacecraft finally completes its mission, while it's
obviously clear to anyone in the audience, that the hero (Katherine)
has already won, and is basically just doing a victory lap.

I would wholeheartedly recommend Hidden Figures to just about everyone.

The historical recreation is spot on, the direction is faultless, it
has good pacing, good acting, the script is simplistic but yet
agreeable, and it has something for everyone: it inspires, it
invigorates, and it limits the amount of screen time that Parson gets.

My vote: 8/10 - it does its job well.

yay for IMDb formatting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |