Originally posted by: tangent1138
Anyway-- it is, of course, very dangerous to travel in Iraq without some sort of security, so being a non-embedded reporter is virtually impossible. So... the end result is we get the headlines-- car bombs, suicide bombers, etc. The stuff that's reported by Iraqi stringers and the new agencies pick up.
It may very well be going well in certain areas, schools being built, soccer games being played, etc... but reporters can't get through the bad areas to report those stories. Not from some kind of agenda-- as some claim-- but just by circumstances.
Originally posted by: lokiju
I'd love to hear your first hand accounts and take on your experiences there.
You should start a ATOT blog and share with us.
I'm serious, I'd read it.
Originally posted by: datalink7
I realize how nobody is getting a clear picture from the media. I read arguments in P&N and some seem quite silly
Not saying anything about how good or bad the situation is... just that coloring your opinion via what the media is saying isn't leading you to the truth.
-1LT Phillips
Somewhere in Baghdad
Originally posted by: datalink7
I realize how nobody is getting a clear picture from the media. I read arguments in P&N and some seem quite silly
Not saying anything about how good or bad the situation is... just that coloring your opinion via what the media is saying isn't leading you to the truth.
-1LT Phillips
Somewhere in Baghdad
Originally posted by: chambersc
So........ is Iraq good or bad? On the whole, is it prospering or not?
Originally posted by: jjsole
No question we rely on the media, and they always unfairly report the death and destruction first, and most places in the country are not wartorn and most civilians and soldiers will not be injured or lose their lives.
Does that make the concern over the war etc. overblown in this case?
yeh, if only there was such a thing as a death-less war. you know... not even deaths from equipment malfunction, human error, or friendly fire.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: jjsole
No question we rely on the media, and they always unfairly report the death and destruction first, and most places in the country are not wartorn and most civilians and soldiers will not be injured or lose their lives.
Does that make the concern over the war etc. overblown in this case?
3-6-2007 9 U.S. soldiers killed north of Baghdad
The nine U.S. deaths Monday brought to 20 the number of Americans killed in Iraq this month. At least 3,184 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of the Iraq war in March 2003.
If only there was real reasons to go to war like San Fransico harbor bombed or something.Originally posted by: moshquerade
yeh, if only there was such a thing as a death-less war. you know... not even deaths from equipment malfunction, human error, or friendly fire.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: jjsole
No question we rely on the media, and they always unfairly report the death and destruction first, and most places in the country are not wartorn and most civilians and soldiers will not be injured or lose their lives.
Does that make the concern over the war etc. overblown in this case?
3-6-2007 9 U.S. soldiers killed north of Baghdad
The nine U.S. deaths Monday brought to 20 the number of Americans killed in Iraq this month. At least 3,184 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of the Iraq war in March 2003.
Originally posted by: datalink7
I realize how nobody is getting a clear picture from the media. I read arguments in P&N and some seem quite silly
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
If only there was real reasons to go to war like San Fransico harbor bombed or something.Originally posted by: moshquerade
yeh, if only there was such a thing as a death-less war. you know... not even deaths from equipment malfunction, human error, or friendly fire.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: jjsole
No question we rely on the media, and they always unfairly report the death and destruction first, and most places in the country are not wartorn and most civilians and soldiers will not be injured or lose their lives.
Does that make the concern over the war etc. overblown in this case?
3-6-2007 9 U.S. soldiers killed north of Baghdad
The nine U.S. deaths Monday brought to 20 the number of Americans killed in Iraq this month. At least 3,184 members of the U.S. military have died since the beginning of the Iraq war in March 2003.
Originally posted by: randomint
just keep your redneck brothers from down south in check.
raping and murdering innocent iraqis is not good ... mmmkay?
thanks!