8748 Mark.
E4400 @ 2.8Ghz on Conroe865PE, 2x1GB DDR400 @ 224Mhz, 2-3-3-8
If this benchmark truely scales equal to "P-Rating", that would put me at equivalent to an 8.748Ghz P4 Northwood.
Scaling the result equal to 2.0Ghz, that gives 6248 - within 50 pts of Mir96TA's score. I was hoping my score might be slightly better due to memory speed, but I guess this benchmark isn't really affected by that.
8775 Mark, after stopping some background programs. Fixing the scaling for the exact freq of my CPU, gives 6273 Marks for 2.0Ghz, closer to Mir96TA.
Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
8782 marks
E6400 @3280
Originally posted by: StopSign
E6300 @ 3190
8838
Originally posted by: Cheex
E6300 @ 3.15GHz (450x7)
Score: 8576
Interesting how my lowly 2.8Ghz DDR system compares to some others - even to a rig @ 3.28 Ghz! Yet mine scales accurately to other DDR400 systems. Is this benchmark finally proof positive that DDR memory is actually MORE efficient than DDR2? It seems that way! This may be a major breakthrough.