Nuclear Multi-Core CPU benchmark

[Nathelion]

First, using the exe from the old link at the beginning of the thread:
ALU: 5069
FPU: 5360
MT: 29350
Overall:20878

Then with the new version:
ALU: 5117
FPU: 5370
MT: 28537
Overall:20362

Was the old link updated? Not only did it work, the exe:s look to be identical.

These scores are with dual Opteron 2393s @ 2867 MHz

 

[evolucion8]

Me using the 2.0 RC1 version which I think is the last version.

ALU: 7205
FPU: 7936
MT: 30144
Overall: 22180

21,744 with new OC.

Even though my score isn't much higher than yours, I wonder why this is happening, you have an 400MHz advantage, could it be RAM timings or chipset optimizations? My RAM timings are quite tight, they're running at 5-5-5-13 at 1,056MHz, I also turned on chipset optimizations like RAM Twister, transaction booster and stuff like that which are moderate because too agressive and my PC wouldn't boot.

 

[VirtualLarry]

I have my Q8200 @ 2.8ghz at the moment (400x7, 1.2V) and I scored 14649.

It's kind of odd how 8 more MB of L2 cache only adds up to 10% more performance per clock.

I wonder if it's even worth upgrading this rig then. It has an E5200 @ 3.625Ghz, and it scores 12500, which is around what an Athlon II X4 630 @ 2.8Ghz scores as well.

It's an IP35-E, and I have an M1-stepping Q8200 ready to drop in. Is it even worth it?

 

[TurtleCrusher]

FX-8350 stock

Atom 3735G 1.33Ghz/1.86Ghz in a Toshiba Encore Mini 7" 1GB. Plugged in.

ALU Score: 2020
FPU Score: 2604
MT Score 4T: 6541

Total Score: 5010

It is a little surprising to see the Atom match the old K8's at 2.5-2.7Ghz.

Edit:

I wonder if it's even worth upgrading this rig then. It has an E5200 @ 3.625Ghz, and it scores 12500, which is around what an Athlon II X4 630 @ 2.8Ghz scores as well.

It's an IP35-E, and I have an M1-stepping Q8200 ready to drop in. Is it even worth it?

Drop it in if you still got it

 

[Deders]

I know people usually frown upon necro threads but this one could prove quite interesting.

6700K @4.6. Sig rig.

 

[inf64]

Found this app on my hard drive, gave it a go. 4690K @ 4.2Ghz, DDR3 2400Mhz, MSI Z97 G45 board. High perf. profile (just for this test). Not bad compared to above 6700K @ 4.6Ghz

 

[Makaveli]

I know people usually frown upon necro threads

Even more so when its a 5 year old thread!

 

[bystander36]

Nuclearus doesn't recognize a 6-core/12-thread system. It seems to top out at 8 by the above.

 

[TurtleCrusher]

New download link for 2.0.0

 

[TurtleCrusher]

FX-8350 stock

Atom 3735G 1.33Ghz/1.86Ghz in a Toshiba Encore Mini 7" 1GB. Plugged in.

ALU Score: 2020
FPU Score: 2604
MT Score 4T: 6541

Total Score: 5010

It is a little surprising to see the Atom match the old K8's at 2.5-2.7Ghz.

7300HQ plugged in.

It seems like the only anomalies between my old FX-8350 and my 7300HQ is that the L1/L2 on the FX is actually faster. Also the i5 is 5x faster than the FX at factoring. That must be some hardware extension, right?

 

[TheELF]

Are you sure you're not running anything in the background?
Or are mobile CPUs just slower?
Doesn't your CPU hit 3.5Ghz in single,because the prog says 2.5Ghz.
L1/L2 speed seem very low as well for you.

 

[TurtleCrusher]

Are you sure you're not running anything in the background?
Or are mobile CPUs just slower?
Doesn't your CPU hit 3.5Ghz in single,because the prog says 2.5Ghz.
L1/L2 speed seem very low as well for you.

I don't think this test is truly single threaded when benching, I'm only hitting 3.1-3.3Ghz during it. I do hit 3.5 in CPUmark99.

 

[mrpiggy]

This test does not work right with my overclocked 3.7 Ghz Xeon E5-2699 V3 18 core.

All the Multi-thread stuff only shows 0's. So I get:

ALU score 9032
FPU score 12198
MT score 0

So a grand total of only 3438.. :-(