NV 12VHPWR issues revisited

Page 19 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jan Olšan

Senior member
Jan 12, 2017
467
874
136
All these nice little changes fail to address the main issue, it's still a flawed design with too little room for error. I would not be surprised if we see yet another change to the "standard" once the 500W+ GPUs reach the wild.

The good news is everyone with < 400W GPUs is safe using it by now. That's where the rating should have stopped imho, any 400W+ card should carry two connectors.
Yeah, what would help safeguard against failures is actual (calibrated) thermal probe next to the connector connected to warning LED or buzzer.

These system that only prevent mis-insertion don't really protect you. The connectors seem to be weak enough to fail even when properly inserted.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,653
6,113
136
I don't know about the earlier PCIe 8pin's 80% figure or the 90% claim for 12VHPWR, but surely 600W / 756W is about 80% which is far closer to 90% than 50%.

To this day, I can't see any possible advantage to these new connectors yet Nvidia stubbornly stick to them in some Apple-like "we know best" attitude.

The advantage is blatantly obvious. 1 connector and 1 wire set, instead of 4 of each.

I certainly wouldn't want to deal with 4 power cables sets and connectors when 1 will do.
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
3,040
4,031
106
To this day, I can't see any possible advantage to these new connectors yet Nvidia stubbornly stick to them in some Apple-like "we know best" attitude.
ASrock uses this connector too for the 9070. Nvidia is using the 12V-2x6 port, none of the 50 series will be using 12VHPWR
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and Elfear

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,370
12,177
136
Again, this is simply you being ignorant of that connector ratings mean. Spikes are a complete non issue. The card would need a spike bigger than it would take to melt it's silicon, to harm the connector.

These are standard Microfit 3 connectors, rated for 10.5 Amps x 6 pairs x 12v = 756Watts in 12 pin config.

That's the first I'm hearing of capacity that high, highest capacity I heard of for 12VHPWR was ~720W and that's being generous. The newer 12V-2x6 fudges capacity a bit by mandating that cards that use it allow up to 75W through the PCIe connector on the motherboard, effectively increasing its rating and capacity by 75W.

per @poke01 's commentary, you're still looking at rating being ~80% of capacity which is still uncomfortably close unless your card is using two connectors like a 4090Ti. There are some 4090s out there with 600W BIOSes, and I'm not sure all of those are dual connector cards.

Plus, again that how much it could handle continuously over long periods

600W, assuming everything is seated perfectly.

, and that will have it's own safety margin built in

A lot less than what you got with old PCIe 8-pin.

, so it could probably handle more beyond that indefinitely.

Yeah maybe another 50-100W, but if you are slamming 600W constantly through one 12v-2x6 connector with transients over 750W then what do you suppose is going to happen?

12VHPWR (and 12v-2x6) would be a much better connector if they had rated it at 350W instead of 600W. NV and board partners wanted to recover PCB space spent on multiple PCIe 8-pin connectors and pushed an ambitious rating for their new connector to save a few dollars per PCB. High-end cards like the 4090 should have had two 12VHPWR connectors from the start, it shouldn't have taken them until the Ti model to put two of them on the PCB.
 
Last edited:

Seba

Golden Member
Sep 17, 2000
1,596
252
126
The advantage is blatantly obvious. 1 connector and 1 wire set, instead of 4 of each.

I certainly wouldn't want to deal with 4 power cables sets and connectors when 1 will do.
Too bad that the "1 will do" part did not turn quite true in practice.
 

Seba

Golden Member
Sep 17, 2000
1,596
252
126
No half plugged in connector is safe. Now that the Sense pins will stop that, one will be fine.

No need for "half plugged". 1 mm off is enough to be a potential danger.

Also the sensitivity to any bend in the wires near the connector.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,653
6,113
136
No need for "half plugged". 1 mm off is enough to be a potential danger.

Also the sensitivity to any bend in the wires near the connector.

Not really. The sense pins have been shortened, the power pins lengthened. The sense pins now lose contact long before there is an issue with the power pins.

You have to properly seat the cable, or the card wont' run.
 
Jul 27, 2020
22,310
15,577
146
The newer 12V-2x6 fudges capacity a bit by mandating that cards that use it allow up to 75W through the PCIe connector on the motherboard, effectively increasing its rating and capacity by 75W.
They should increase the PCIe slot's power delivery to 150W minimum or introduce an additional dedicated power connector right next to the PCIe slot to provide power. It's stupid to have a huge cable going to the GPU when power could be routed through a cable connected to the back of the mobo's PCB or next to the ATX connector where the cable wouldn't interfere with much of anything else.
 

Seba

Golden Member
Sep 17, 2000
1,596
252
126
I would rather have a melted cable than melted PCB traces on the motherboard.

150W might not sound to be much, but at 12V it's 12.5A.
 

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,749
2,145
136
150W would certainly broaden the market for slot powered cards, but I can't see that taking off until the whole ATX spec gets overhauled. It's hard to imagine that without breaking compatibility, and since we already have a solution to add 75W to a card that's a lot of effort for a solved problem.
 

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
6,957
15,595
136
Not sure what that would even benefit. When the concern is high GPU power usage, adding 75W to the slot seems to be deck chair rearrangement.
The extra head-room would indeed be just a band-aid for the bigger problem: power budgets in the modern PC are out of control, doubly so on the GPU side.

150W on the PCIe slot would just enable the 650W GPU sooner rather than later.
 
Reactions: Tlh97 and blckgrffn

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
32,128
10,148
136

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,653
6,113
136
The amount of people who have a motherboard with that proprietary connector on it, a GPU that uses it, and a GPU that draws large amounts of power is probably too small to draw any conclusions on its safety tbh!

Also, IIRC, those MBs with the special GPU connector, have a 12v2x6 pin connector on the back. That isn't removing the cabling. It's just hiding it, and adding yet another connector on the front. So this can only make any issues worse, not better.
 
Reactions: blckgrffn

DrMrLordX

Lifer
Apr 27, 2000
22,370
12,177
136
They should increase the PCIe slot's power delivery to 150W minimum or introduce an additional dedicated power connector right next to the PCIe slot to provide power. It's stupid to have a huge cable going to the GPU when power could be routed through a cable connected to the back of the mobo's PCB or next to the ATX connector where the cable wouldn't interfere with much of anything else.

Ugh no. The last thing you want to do is push more power through the motherboard. It is much easier to bypass the PCIe connector entirely and feed power directly from the PSU to the dGPU, which is why PCIe 6 and 8-pin connectors were created in the first place (and why 12VHPWR and 12V-2x6 were created to replace them). AMD learned this lesson the hard way:


Plus there are other reasons not to push power over the PCIe slot that are not germane to this discussion. Regardless it's a bad idea.

NV (or PCI-SIG, or both) have forgotten AMD's snafu by agreeing to a new cable spec that somehow encourages the video card to pull more power from the PCIe slot when the cable gets close to 600W. I guess they're hoping transient spikes will load the PCIe slot instead of the cable?
 

DaaQ

Golden Member
Dec 8, 2018
1,725
1,213
136
Actually there is lot of wiggle room for that. Cable/Connector Power ratings are based on long term heating thresholds. It's not about sudden failure based on exceeding a certain value.

It's spec'd to deliver 600 watts endlessly and not heat up too much. A short term spike is not a problem. It's the average over time that cause too much heat.

You could pump 800W through it for minutes in a row, if you let it cool a bit after before resuming load. But if you could make it draw 800W for hours, then you probably would end up causing problems, but you aren't doing that with out power shunt mods, and if something goes wrong you only have yourself to blame.
You are neglecting cable size i.e AWG.
The advantage is blatantly obvious. 1 connector and 1 wire set, instead of 4 of each.

I certainly wouldn't want to deal with 4 power cables sets and connectors when 1 will do.
SE above, 4 cables at a lower gauge will dissipate heat from high amperage than 1 ONE lower gauge wire. PERIOD.
No half plugged in connector is safe. Now that the Sense pins will stop that, one will be fine.
NOPE let be generous and say they they were 16 AWG, it will not be fine. remember normal PSU wires are 18 AWG.
Not really. The sense pins have been shortened, the power pins lengthened. The sense pins now lose contact long before there is an issue with the power pins.

You have to properly seat the cable, or the card wont' run.
You are completely forgetting the OHMS law, in order to supply additional amperage, you MUST increase the wire gauge. IDK if 14 would do it, maybe 12. It is for those companies to figure out. RIGHT?
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,653
6,113
136
You are neglecting cable size i.e AWG.

SE above, 4 cables at a lower gauge will dissipate heat from high amperage than 1 ONE lower gauge wire. PERIOD.

NOPE let be generous and say they they were 16 AWG, it will not be fine. remember normal PSU wires are 18 AWG.

You are completely forgetting the OHMS law, in order to supply additional amperage, you MUST increase the wire gauge. IDK if 14 would do it, maybe 12.
You are drastically over-estimate cabling requirements. Do you have small plug in space heater. Go check the cable that plugs into the wall. It's probable several feet long, and I bet it's not larger than 16 gauge (We have three here from different brands and none are). That's something that meant to be left plugged in at full blast (they are pretty much all 1500w/12 amps) indefinitely.

That's 12 amps, 24/7 through a power cord longer than anything inside a PC.

For shorter term appliances like hair driers (often rated 1875W 125V@15Amps), they are allowed to pull right up to the standard 15 amps of wall sockets (backed by 15amp breakers) over the same power cords.

As for these GPU connectors:

At 600W/6 pairs, that equals 100W/pair, and 100W/12V = 8.3 Amps.

You think that wire that is used extensively, to supply 12 amps continuously 24/7 at longer lengths for space heaters, is somehow insufficient to supply 8.3 amps in shorter lengths, for a more intermittent load in a PC??

It is for those companies to figure out. RIGHT?

Current capacity of cabling, was figured out before you were born. They aren't under-specifying the cabling.
 
Reactions: dr1337 and DaaQ

DaaQ

Golden Member
Dec 8, 2018
1,725
1,213
136
You are drastically over-estimate cabling requirements. Do you have small plug in space heater. Go check the cable that plugs into the wall. It's probable several feet long, and I bet it's not larger than 16 gauge (We have three here from different brands and none are). That's something that meant to be left plugged in at full blast (they are pretty much all 1500w/12 amps) indefinitely.

That's 12 amps, 24/7 through a power cord longer than anything inside a PC.

For shorter term appliances like hair driers (often rated 1875W 125V@15Amps), they are allowed to pull right up to the standard 15 amps of wall sockets (backed by 15amp breakers) over the same power cords.

As for these GPU connectors:

At 600W/6 pairs, that equals 100W/pair, and 100W/12V = 8.3 Amps.

You think that wire that is used extensively, to supply 12 amps continuously 24/7 at longer lengths for space heaters, is somehow insufficient to supply 8.3 amps in shorter lengths, for a more intermittent load in a PC??



Current capacity of cabling, was figured out before you were born. They aren't under-specifying the cabling.
Space heater and hair dryers are meant to dissipate the heat at their coils. False comparison.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |