NV 12VHPWR issues revisited

Page 20 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,749
2,145
136
They're really not equivalent comparisons. Self-heating of the wires really isn't a limiting factor in a PC, even 18 gauge is more than fine with the full 600W over 6 conductor pairs. Voltage drop is more of a concern; it's not an issue if you have a couple hundred millivolt drop over a 2m for a 120V hair dryer cord but 200mV on your 12V rail is reasonably substantial.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,653
6,113
136
They're really not equivalent comparisons. Self-heating of the wires really isn't a limiting factor in a PC, even 18 gauge is more than fine with the full 600W over 6 conductor pairs. Voltage drop is more of a concern; it's not an issue if you have a couple hundred millivolt drop over a 2m for a 120V hair dryer cord but 200mV on your 12V rail is reasonably substantial.

When people are freaking out about safety, it is a reasonable comparison to point out. But I'm glad that you agree that cable heating is not a real issue. Another issue down.

Voltage drop is a separate issue. You could indeed have a drop of about 200mv, maybe even 300mv across the cabling at 600W. But this isn't a problem either. Drops under these kinds of loads are expected and will not cause problems.

You can see the difference between ATX power specs here:

Here is the allowable PCIe voltage deviation (until ATX 3.0, there was no requirement).

PCIe Voltage DeviationNo RequirementNo Requirement-8% ~ +5%-8% ~ +5%


8% of 12v is .960 mv, or nearly 1 full Volt. So GPU are expected to keep running at 11V...

Shocker: Engineers actually thought about how load affects voltage drops, and everything is built taking this into account.
 

DaaQ

Golden Member
Dec 8, 2018
1,725
1,213
136
When people are freaking out about safety, it is a reasonable comparison to point out. But I'm glad that you agree that cable heating is not a real issue. Another issue down.

Voltage drop is a separate issue. You could indeed have a drop of about 200mv, maybe even 300mv across the cabling at 600W. But this isn't a problem either. Drops under these kinds of loads are expected and will not cause problems.

You can see the difference between ATX power specs here:

Here is the allowable PCIe voltage deviation (until ATX 3.0, there was no requirement).

PCIe Voltage DeviationNo RequirementNo Requirement-8% ~ +5%-8% ~ +5%


8% of 12v is .960 mv, or nearly 1 full Volt. So GPU are expected to keep running at 11V...

Shocker: Engineers actually thought about how load affects voltage drops, and everything is built taking this into account.
Not going to read through any of your quoted dribble, but since you want to be all armchair engineer. It IS about the RESISTANCE. You know that one single part of ohm's law you keep leaving out.

Resistance through the connector, most typically on the board side and not the PSU ( makes you wonder doesn't it?) is the spot that roasts from the excess R=V/I

Your heater example, the coils are the resistance that create the heat. Designed that way. Example post #476

I really doubt you know much about voltage drop also. Well beside what you can Google or Wiki up.
 
Reactions: igor_kavinski

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,653
6,113
136
Not going to read through any of your quoted dribble, but since you want to be all armchair engineer. It IS about the RESISTANCE. You know that one single part of ohm's law you keep leaving out.

Resistance through the connector, most typically on the board side and not the PSU ( makes you wonder doesn't it?) is the spot that roasts from the excess R=V/I

Your heater example, the coils are the resistance that create the heat. Designed that way. Example post #476

I really doubt you know much about voltage drop also. Well beside what you can Google or Wiki up.

I can tell you are just parroting stuff you read on the internet without a full grasp of the topic. Your posts keep bringing to mind the very old saying: "Don't try to teach your Grandma to suck eggs".

MrTeal OTOH actually seems to understand quite well, and made a valid point, which I believe I adequately addressed. I welcome his response if he disagrees.

You complained about cabling, claiming it couldn't handle the amperage, and that it would need to be 14 or 12 gauge. No one who really understood would claim that. This made it clear you were just grasping at straws.

So I gave you a simple example you should be able to understand, to highlight why the cabling was fine. Power cables don't care if the are powering a GPU, or a Heater (or a Load tester). Amperage is Amperage. The current carrying limit is based on power cable heating (and the insulation rating if you want more detail).

I've seen testing on the connector, where 900W (skipping the GPU and using a PSU load tester) was pumped through it for half an an hour and the hot spot stabilized at about 52C. Which is fine, especially considering that's a 50% overload for half an hour (which would never realistically happen), and then pumped 1200W through it for 10+ minutes, then it reached something like 82C which is a good point to stop before you start melting things, but that's double the the continuous load rating, way beyond never going to happen.

It's unfortunate that they never thought to design the sense pins as a safety mechanism from the start. If they did, I'm quite certain there never would have been any issue with these connectors. Instead we now have some people with unreasonable fear of the connector.
 
Jul 27, 2020
22,309
15,576
146
Resistance through the connector, most typically on the board side and not the PSU ( makes you wonder doesn't it?) is the spot that roasts from the excess R=V/I
Very true. It's actually funny that the "cheap" engineers with definitely no real world experience decided to shroud the pins in plastic while making the decision to let them go toast with almost 600W of power for prolonged periods and no way to dissipate the heat, leading to the melting connectors.

Informative articles on the topic:


Even with the new connector, the cable maker needs to strictly follow the PCI-SIG guidelines:



Seems it would be best to go with a reputable ATX 3.1 PSU and only use the included cable (or buy any additional ones from the PSU maker) and avoid 3rd party cables.
 

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,749
2,145
136
Nah, I don't disagree. It's (obviously) not a problem in the ATX spec. I just wanted to point out there are different concerns and constraints in both examples. Generally with high power AC cords your limit is heating of the connector and wire at high power unless you're speccing out crazy long extension cords. In a PC, that's less of a concern than drop so if you're wanting to investigate the limits of wiring gauge you should focus there.

It'd be kind of like a problem in structural engineering where you might have a couple different beam systems that look outwardly similar, but one you have a big beam because you're holding a lot of weight and you need it to be strong. Another you might have a big beam because even though you're not carrying much weight you need very little deflection and you need it to be stiff. Different goals and you could use different materials for each even if the outward dimensions appear the same.
 

DaaQ

Golden Member
Dec 8, 2018
1,725
1,213
136
I can tell you are just parroting stuff you read on the internet without a full grasp of the topic. Your posts keep bringing to mind the very old saying: "Don't try to teach your Grandma to suck eggs".

MrTeal OTOH actually seems to understand quite well, and made a valid point, which I believe I adequately addressed. I welcome his response if he disagrees.

You complained about cabling, claiming it couldn't handle the amperage, and that it would need to be 14 or 12 gauge. No one who really understood would claim that. This made it clear you were just grasping at straws.

So I gave you a simple example you should be able to understand, to highlight why the cabling was fine. Power cables don't care if the are powering a GPU, or a Heater (or a Load tester). Amperage is Amperage. The current carrying limit is based on power cable heating (and the insulation rating if you want more detail).

I've seen testing on the connector, where 900W (skipping the GPU and using a PSU load tester) was pumped through it for half an an hour and the hot spot stabilized at about 52C. Which is fine, especially considering that's a 50% overload for half an hour (which would never realistically happen), and then pumped 1200W through it for 10+ minutes, then it reached something like 82C which is a good point to stop before you start melting things, but that's double the the continuous load rating, way beyond never going to happen.

It's unfortunate that they never thought to design the sense pins as a safety mechanism from the start. If they did, I'm quite certain there never would have been any issue with these connectors. Instead we now have some people with unreasonable fear of the connector.

Ok since I am parroting stuff from the internet, why don't you explain why stranded wire is used instead of solid, and what "skin effect" is?

You also have not addressed the very many instances, in why the connector at the card plug overheats (remember resistance), nit not at the 90 or 180 degree ends of the adapters, or the power supplies?
Do you think Cable Mod recalled and discontinued their connector attempts because they designed them bad or that it was because they could not sustain replacing/repairing the 4090s?

All cable is rated, from 22awg on up to 4awg and then some. Why some is acceptable to be solid core versus stranded core.

It is very clear there is a RESISTANCE issue with Nvidia's 12 pin high power connector.

Remember resistance creates heat.

Your posts bring the old saying of you can lead a horse to water, but can't make it drink.

Voltage is equal to current multiplied by resistance. What is not know is the resistance of that connector, to create a melting condition.

Good day sir, you tire me with your attitude and insults.
 

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,749
2,145
136
Ok since I am parroting stuff from the internet, why don't you explain why stranded wire is used instead of solid, and what "skin effect" is?

You also have not addressed the very many instances, in why the connector at the card plug overheats (remember resistance), nit not at the 90 or 180 degree ends of the adapters, or the power supplies?
Do you think Cable Mod recalled and discontinued their connector attempts because they designed them bad or that it was because they could not sustain replacing/repairing the 4090s?

All cable is rated, from 22awg on up to 4awg and then some. Why some is acceptable to be solid core versus stranded core.

It is very clear there is a RESISTANCE issue with Nvidia's 12 pin high power connector.

Remember resistance creates heat.

Your posts bring the old saying of you can lead a horse to water, but can't make it drink.

Voltage is equal to current multiplied by resistance. What is not know is the resistance of that connector, to create a melting condition.

Good day sir, you tire me with your attitude and insults.
What are you even going on about? It's like you're throwing out random terms hoping something sticks. Stranded wire is used instead of solid because it's a lot more flexible. Skin effect has nothing to do with PC power wiring, and even if it did stranded wire still exhibits skin effect proportional to the diameter of the wire not the individual strands.

What exactly is your argument here? I assume you're trying to say that 3x8 pin is better than 12VHPWR because the contact resistance is lower, but it's hard to tell. All the things you're bringing up regarding AWG, solid vs stranded and skin effect are just confusing the issue.
 
Reactions: Heartbreaker

DaaQ

Golden Member
Dec 8, 2018
1,725
1,213
136
What are you even going on about? It's like you're throwing out random terms hoping something sticks. Stranded wire is used instead of solid because it's a lot more flexible. Skin effect has nothing to do with PC power wiring, and even if it did stranded wire still exhibits skin effect proportional to the diameter of the wire not the individual strands.

What exactly is your argument here? I assume you're trying to say that 3x8 pin is better than 12VHPWR because the contact resistance is lower, but it's hard to tell. All the things you're bringing up regarding AWG, solid vs stranded and skin effect are just confusing the issue.
He brought up the space heaters and hair dryers. But I'm done with it. Proof will be in the next gen.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,674
4,566
136
Those 2 x 6 pins are rated for 250W or so with peaks at 350W, for 500 - 600W sustained that s blatantly undersized.

In industrial connectors rated at 10A/pin the contact resistance is guaranted at 0.003 ohm at most, at 8A this imply 0.192W thermal dissipation of the contacted area, and these are connectors of better quality than what is seen in video cards.

The contacts of a dGPU connector will likely have higher thermal loss than this,
eventually 1.5 - 2 x depending of the contact tightness, so 0.3 - 0.4W/pin is quite possible on a not so long run.

Over 12 contacts this make something like 3.6 - 4.8W thermal dissipation
in the connector, and that s a thermaly plastic insulated item with limited dissipation capability, hence there will be some thermal build-up up to the point at wich
the connector temperature will allow full dissipation, as the higher the temp
the more the dissipation capability of a given surface, some of the power will be dissipated through the card soldering of the pins in the PCB, wich is not a good thing reliability wise.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,653
6,113
136
Wtf does it only have one connector on the 5090 FE, that's madness.

Simple. Because it's still under the connectors rating.

It's hilarious watching people that devote so much time to PCMR "Knowledge", spout ignorance about power connectors, because their only knowledge of power connectors seems to come from PCIe 8-Pin connectors, and so they think this is how standards should apply.

PCIe 8 Pin is so underrated because of how it evolved from 6 pin, on cards that needed so little power.

All across industry, Cables/Connectors/switch have amperage rating and they are used right up to that amperage rating, because even at their full ratings, there is plenty of safety factor built in. That is how engineering works. If everyone had to second guess all the industry ratings for everything it would be a massive unworkable mess.

These are standard Molex Micro-Fit+ connectors. Micro-Fit+ is rated for up to 13 amps/pin. 13amps*6pair*12V = 936 Watts...

There is no safety/melting problem using these connectors when properly plugged in.

The original problem was with the sense pins, not the power pins.

The change to the sense pins should ensure they are properly plugged in.
 
Jul 27, 2020
22,309
15,576
146
It's gonna burn!

Don't worry. If it burns, it's been accounted for in the engineering. Only the connector will get destroyed. Everything else will remain functional. Just gotta pay the graphics card repairman. Gaming too hard in the summer ain't covered by the warranty.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |