NV 4060 / 4060TI reviews

Page 25 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
34,782
8,886
136
Are there AAA titles out there today, that won't play on a 6GB GTX 1660 ti on, say, 1080P Med. textures? Or are we upping our everyday standards to require 1080P Ultra now, just because that's the way the benchmarks are run?
8GB cards are for 1080p medium textures these days.
Sometimes they reach high after a patch optimizes the console port.

As for standards, NVIDIA is going to be hard pressed to make a lower end card, given that the 4060 has xx50 class specs.
Thing is, we don't expect the floor to be $300. But it is, four year old products aside.

I AM talking about their new offerings, how the current gen has shaped up, not the card(s) you already have.
Are they still producing the 1660?
 
Reactions: Tlh97

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
8,396
7,050
136
I have a prediction. If the 4060 doesn't sell all that well, nGreedia may release a 12GB version, to make it attractive at the $299 price point. That would be worth a bite.

4060 8GB may then fall down to $249.
Meh it would still be slower than a 6700 XT that you can get for $310 to $320 a lot of the time, and often with a bundled game.
 
Reactions: Tlh97

Timorous

Golden Member
Oct 27, 2008
1,883
3,618
136
I have a prediction. If the 4060 doesn't sell all that well, nGreedia may release a 12GB version, to make it attractive at the $299 price point. That would be worth a bite.

4060 8GB may then fall down to $249.

That would mean AD104 based. Probably as a Super refresh where everything drops down a tier. So the 4060 Super is basically the current 4070. 4070 Super is the current 4080. 4080 Super is a cut AD102 that fits somewhere between the current 4080 and 4090 and then NV could go with 4090 Super as the top card or the 4090Ti

The other option would be to take the current die, cut it to 96 bits but make up for that downgrade with faster ram.
 

Dribble

Platinum Member
Aug 9, 2005
2,076
611
136
You literally complained the 6700 XT isn't Nvidia. Where are you at? Because in the US the 6700 XT can often be found for like $10 to $20 more than the 4060.
Well it's not $10-$20 more in the uk, more like £50. It's also 220W vs 120W so would need a new power supply. It's also well down on features (DLSS being one but there are a number of other nice things Nvidia offers). Finally it's RT support is weak, and who wants to buy a new card that doesn't do RT well - Son plays cyberpunk so first thing he did was run it up and turn on all the options (other than path tracing, although even that runs ok with a mod) and it looks and runs great.

If you are playing at 1080p the 4060 is a well balanced card. The 6700XT is a bit more specialist - you gotta not like RT or upscaling and want to focus on raster only games at 1440p. If that's you well great, but don't rage at everyone else.
 
Reactions: psolord

coercitiv

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2014
7,075
16,290
136
They will use Ultra textures to show the 4060Ti does not fall off a cliff in performance.
I know what can be done to make the 16GB look good, but marketing reps also need to justify the existence of the base model. So I'm curious if they'll manage to have the cake and eat it too.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,742
6,248
136
and textures, you gotta like textures.

I'm very curious to see how Nvidia handles marketing for the 4060Ti 16GB.

I'm thinking NVidia won't bother, leaving the marketing and design up to the AIB partners. It's an afterthought card for NVidia.

It could find buyers among those interested in DL using larger Network models without shelling out for a high end card. I'm interested in dabbling in DL, but as usual this generation, the price is just a bit too high for what you get.

Because for gaming at just $100 less than 4070, I'd stretch to just get the much better card.

It's just a "meh" generation all around. I'm thinking next generation will be a decent one. I expect for RTX 5000, they will have more VRAM starting right near the bottom of the stack, and for RX 8000, AMD will have it's own Tensor core variant, and FSR will run a DL model to improve quality, and perhaps a Xilinx media encoder, so closing the feature gap, and probably 3nm will give another small process jump, and since features and VRAM will be closer, a more competitive landscape.
 
Reactions: Saylick

Timorous

Golden Member
Oct 27, 2008
1,883
3,618
136
I know what can be done to make the 16GB look good, but marketing reps also need to justify the existence of the base model. So I'm curious if they'll manage to have the cake and eat it too.

Base model for e-sports gamers who want great frame rates at 1080p/1440p in titles that don't use the full frame buffer

16GB model for AAA gamers who want to play the latest and greatest titles with maxed out textures.

Something like that perhaps.
 

Dribble

Platinum Member
Aug 9, 2005
2,076
611
136
and textures, you gotta like textures.

I'm very curious to see how Nvidia handles marketing for the 4060Ti 16GB.
Yes. Textures are tied to resolution - you don't actually need the textures designed for 4k at 1080p, even more so if you are using DLSS/FSR which means you are probably rendering at 720p. So yes a 1440p card needs better textures which needs more memory but that's not really necessary at 1080p.

It would be an interesting test with DLSS quality on to go through the texture levels on some games and see if there is any difference, then compare that to native.
 
Last edited:

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,000
126
Textures are tied to resolution - you don't actually need the textures designed for 4k at 1080p, even more so if you are using DLSS/FSR which means you are probably rendering at 720p
This is absolute nonsense. That's not how rasterization, texture mapping, and filtering works. Unless you play games standing perfectly still with your face planted right against a wall, like a desktop picture.

Actually scratch that, even a desktop picture benefits from a higher resolution than native because you're getting a super-sampled image. So double nonsense.
 
Jul 27, 2020
23,188
16,335
146
Yes. Textures are tied to resolution
Detailed is detailed. You can turn the texture quality to highest even at 1080p. Totally up to you whether it's worth it or not. Maybe on a small screen like a laptop, lower quality textures may not be noticeable but any display size above 15 inches with 1080p will make low quality textures stick out like a sore thumb.
 

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
8,396
7,050
136
Well it's not $10-$20 more in the uk, more like £50. It's also 220W vs 120W so would need a new power supply. It's also well down on features (DLSS being one but there are a number of other nice things Nvidia offers). Finally it's RT support is weak, and who wants to buy a new card that doesn't do RT well - Son plays cyberpunk so first thing he did was run it up and turn on all the options (other than path tracing, although even that runs ok with a mod) and it looks and runs great.

If you are playing at 1080p the 4060 is a well balanced card. The 6700XT is a bit more specialist - you gotta not like RT or upscaling and want to focus on raster only games at 1440p. If that's you well great, but don't rage at everyone else.
My biggest problem with 8GB cards in 2023 is that they're a bet on getting well optimized console ports as we enter the second half of the current console gen. Which is IMO a sucker's bet, as ports to PC have for the most part been lousy as long as I have been gaming, usually requiring you to brute force performance with better than console hardware. The XBox Series X has a segmented memory architecture where 10GB of RAM is much faster than the other 6GB, so that's used as the VRAM. Last year I bought a 12GB card (6700 XT) because I'm expecting ports to PC to remain poorly optimized the same way they have been the last 40 years, and thus I wanted to be above that 10GB mark and with a little headroom without spending $500 on a gpu to get to the 16GB mark at the time. Same reason in 2014 that I spent $20 more on a 4C/8T Xeon E3-1231v3 instead of the hot gaming cpu of the time (the 4C/4T i5-4690k) so I'd get 8 hardware threads to better match the octacores in the consoles since wide parallelization was an absolute necessity to get games running well on the last gen consoles given how low the clockspeed and IPC were on the Jaguar cores. And sure enough 4C/8T cpus aged a lot better than the 4C/4T ones in the second half of last console gen. I expect to see similar with >10GB vs 8GB. We have already seen it this year with ports like The Last of Us, Hogwarts Legacy, and Forspoken. PC first devs like CD Projekt Red, Bethesda, id, Remedy, and Techland will optimize to make 8GB work but I don't trust console first devs to do the same.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Ranulf

Thunder 57

Diamond Member
Aug 19, 2007
3,411
5,635
136
You don't know where he is, and what outlets he shops.

For Example: I'm in Canada, and only willing to buy a GPU from Amazon.ca (not their 3rd party market either) for simplicity in returns and overall trustworthiness. Prices at Amazon.ca have been fairly in line with performance.

I have a big wish list of AMD and NVidia GPUs and it's the first link I check each morning looking for deals.

I've never seen a RX 6700 (non XT) in stock. At Amazon it's a unicorn.

Prices are in Canadian Dollars:

On the AMD side:

Best Priced RX 67x0 option is the 6750 XT for $539.
Next step down is:
RX 7600 for $369, Which has a better price than the cheapest 6650 Xt at $392.
For the Step up:
6800XT for $793, there are no Amazon sold RX 6800 (A card I would be interested in), but even a third party is selling for an unpalatable $699, and it was kind of lucky to see a 6800XT in stock at all.

On the NVidia side:

4060 Ti - $539 - Essentially equal performance and price with the 6750 Xt.
4060 - $419 - Though these just entered the system and there is only 2. Wait a few days and the should fall to $399 vs $369 for the 7600, but for now the price difference may make the RX 7600 the winner.
4070 - $804 vs $793 for the 6800XT.


So here at least. At each performance tier, the price difference between AMD and NVidia is quite small, so then it becomes a battle of features, and NVidia wins the battle of features IMO.

Sorry you live in a crappy country.

Get away with changing the irrelevant things like names of chips. How nefarious.

I don't even know how to resond to this, The 4060 is a rebranded 4050. But hey, you do you.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Saylick

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
15,914
6,406
136

The 4060 Ti 16 GB's release is July 18th, according to Videocardz.
 

Heartbreaker

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2006
4,742
6,248
136

The 4060 Ti 16 GB's release is July 18th, according to Videocardz.

Unless NVidia have a last minute change of heart on pricing (we know they won't), it's going to be another round of very negative reviews, and deservedly so...

I would actually like this card, but not at $670 CAD, which is the likely price here...
 

gdansk

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
4,012
6,596
136
Still it's 16GB for CUDA applications. For $500. They won't have to discount that model.
 
Jul 27, 2020
23,188
16,335
146
Yeah I was thinking exactly that, especially WRT Deep Learning applications.
How long before they realize they are "losing" money this way and make the necessary "updates" to the consumer drivers to slow down AI CUDA applications, to upsell their professional parts?
 
Jul 27, 2020
23,188
16,335
146
I'd trade my citizenship for crappy Canadian citizenship tbh. Would be nice to live in a country run by responsible adults instead of banks and corporations.
Dunno about that. A friend went there and he had to work three jobs just to survive, all in different places and had to use the train to commute. He hardly got four hours of sleep per day. He decided against staying there for citizenship.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |