coercitiv
Diamond Member
- Jan 24, 2014
- 7,075
- 16,290
- 136
Gaming revenue was going up through the crypto boom as well. Believe it or not, some startups buy even AMD cards.Except Gaming revenue has been going back up...
Gaming revenue was going up through the crypto boom as well. Believe it or not, some startups buy even AMD cards.Except Gaming revenue has been going back up...
Ventus is supposed to be a terrible card. This one performed a lot betterYeah, a startlingly poor showing from the TI Super.
For most purposes, you're getting a 4070Ti with some extra ram.
4070 Super looks like it will be the star of refresh-o-rama. Don't have high hopes for the 4080 Super (Guessing it will be within 1-2% of the 7900XTX)...
View attachment 92357
Wow, not even a stock OC and it varied that much? Holy cow.Ventus is supposed to be a terrible card. This one performed a lot better
ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super TUF Review
While the $800 ASUS RTX 4070 Ti Super TUF doesn't include a factory overclock, it features a highly capable all-metal cooler—ranking as the most effective among all the cards tested today. Additionally, the dual BIOS provides a quiet mode, transforming the card into a whisper-quiet gaming machine.www.techpowerup.com
Thanks to the 256-bit bus the card is 6% faster than the 4070 Ti at 4K versus 3% at 1080p and 1440p. Such difference.Anytime nVidia does a "Super" refresh I am reminded of how bad that generation is and how it forces nVidia to put lipstick on a pig to generate some hype/sales.
The only saving grace is that now nVidia buyers can get 256-bit card starting at $800, LMAO!
What a time to be alive.
Hey, don't give any ideas to Nvidia on how to market this thing. The last thing we need is a slide comparing 4070 Ti Super vs. 4070 Ti that says 2000%* fps improvement.RTX 4070Ti Super is super fast.
I see 1000% increase in FPS, certainly worth the money.
Yet you all are disappointed.
Why not?Hey, don't give any ideas to Nvidia on how to market this thing. The last thing we need is a slide comparing 4070 Ti Super vs. 4070 Ti that says 2000%* fps improvement.
*At 4K, max RT, and with DLSS 3 FG enabled.
W1z found exactly the variance Nvidia put out in a last minute tech press alert. Aussie Steve's test suite didn't.Wow, not even a stock OC and it varied that much? Holy cow.
Hardware Unboxed mentioned in their review that they got a message from Nvidia saying something was screwy with the Ventus and that it had been grossly underperforming in some reviews. HUB's Ventus 4070 Ti Super was like 1% below their Asus 4070 Ti Super but other reviewers were getting much worse results.Wow, not even a stock OC and it varied that much? Holy cow.
Hardware Unboxed mentioned in their review that they got a message from Nvidia saying something was screwy with the Ventus and that it had been grossly underperforming in some reviews. HUB's Ventus 4070 Ti Super was like 1% below their Asus 4070 Ti Super but other reviewers were getting much worse results.
I've never had an issue with MSI GPUs. Never-the-less they are on the bottom of my list of vendors now, simply because of all the plastic, and especially, the plastic backplates. I consider that an inexcusable cheap out on BoM.Wow, sounds like an amazing QA flub. It will be interesting to see if those were early reviewer sample issues or if those were pulled blind for reviewers from a large import batch. If its the latter, it will be really interesting to see how MSI handles it. I've had great luck with their GPUs in the past.
I don't care how they are doing on the specs/perf level. I'm talking about sales.AMD failed with the design of this generation and despite this they are doing relatively well, probably in large part due to giving their cards more VRAM.
Sales is not just about market share, but also about absolute sales. Also, AMD has way higher market share than that if you count the consoles.I don't care how they are doing on the specs/perf level. I'm talking about sales.
AMD is barely at 10% for marketshare. So saying Nvidia is in trouble is laughable.
Consoles aren't even related.Sales is not just about market share, but also about absolute sales. Also, AMD has way higher market share than that if you count the consoles.
I also never argued that Nvidia is in trouble, just that this gen looks to be a rather poor seller, aside from the 4090's (both for gaming and AI usage).
As expensive as the initial Ada cards were, now they aren't.
I am very uncertain on how good RDNA4 and Battlemage will be.I doubt neither AMD nor Intel will be able to counter this effectively.
Yeah, a startlingly poor showing from the TI Super.
For most purposes, you're getting a 4070Ti with some extra ram.
4070 Super looks like it will be the star of refresh-o-rama. Don't have high hopes for the 4080 Super (Guessing it will be within 1-2% of the 7900XTX)...
If you check each game then you will notice that this average is only because of Alan Wake 2. The rest saw only 10% decrease in performance 4070 Ti Super 16GB -> 4070 Ti 12GB.1440p RT difference between Ti Super and Super is just 7% but look how the additional VRAM shines at 4K RT!
View attachment 92396
I feel deeply sorry for the people who got suckered into buying the 4000 series 12GB crap.
But it does not bode well for the 12GB cards in future similar games.If you check each game then you will notice that this average is only because of Alan Wake 2.
If you check each game then you will notice that this average is only because of Alan Wake 2. The rest saw only 10% decrease in performance 4070 Ti Super 16GB -> 4070 Ti 12GB.
It's not even funny how many cards from the green camp get murdered here:
View attachment 92397
4070 Ti Super wins. Finally something that isn't worth stomping on with extreme prejudice.
Igor do not feel so sorry friend, for us 12GB cards peasants.1440p RT difference between Ti Super and Super is just 7% but look how the additional VRAM shines at 4K RT!
View attachment 92396
I feel deeply sorry for the people who got suckered into buying the 4000 series 12GB crap.