NV40 benches (in case u didnt see)

MDE

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
13,199
1
81
Make sure to look at the settings for each card on the graphs, the 6800 Ultra is almost always running a higher level of AA\AF than the 5950 Ultra and 9800 XT.
 

fsstrike

Senior member
Feb 5, 2004
523
0
0
Whether or not the 6800 benchies are on higher res with more AA and AF, they still suck. 28 FPS in ut2k4 with 4x and 16af is better tahn current cards, but still unplayable. I dont know about you but I cant play with 28 FPS. I am unipressed so far...
 

Alkali

Senior member
Aug 14, 2002
483
0
0
Originally posted by: fsstrike
Whether or not the 6800 benchies are on higher res with more AA and AF, they still suck. 28 FPS in ut2k4 with 4x and 16af is better tahn current cards, but still unplayable. I dont know about you but I cant play with 28 FPS. I am unipressed so far...

I think we all are, but I think we should all realise its not a proper review yet, plus we hav'nt got other reviews yet, lets see how things go today with the reviews.
 

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
I'll be more interested to see Anand's review, Kyle/ H has been on the anti nVidia warpath for a long time now. (remember his "Oh you despicable cheaters" rant?)

In any case, I think those benches were most impressive, although not enough so to make me not wait for the ATI benches.
(sorry BFG - I can't overcome this raging nVidia obsession!)
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
2,980
126
16 pipes and SM 3.0 is looking a definite. Also FP32 at full speed, assuming it's not marketing speak, is very good news for nVidia.

But 16xAF? Woohoo! Finally nVidia, you got with the program.
 

g3pro

Senior member
Jan 15, 2004
404
0
0
guys, the most important bench is the CoD bench: 50% faster is the 6800 over the others.
 

reever

Senior member
Oct 4, 2003
451
0
0
Originally posted by: g3pro
guys, the most important bench is the CoD bench: 50% faster is the 6800 over the others.

Actually seeing as how every card is very playable at their respective quality settings I would say that is the least important bench...

 

g3pro

Senior member
Jan 15, 2004
404
0
0
i was hoping the NV40 would be at least 2x faster than what is out now, but oh well. the raw speed increase is fantastic. considering how this is an benchmark...
 

MDE

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
13,199
1
81
Originally posted by: reever
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
and just wait till the drivers improve

Yeah look what it did to the NV30
Nvidia really needs to retire this comment
It did help. The 5800 Ultra compares pretty favorably to the 9700 Pro using the newest drivers.

Where's Rollo when you need him?
 

reever

Senior member
Oct 4, 2003
451
0
0
Originally posted by: MDE
Originally posted by: reever
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
and just wait till the drivers improve

Yeah look what it did to the NV30
Nvidia really needs to retire this comment
It did help. The 5800 Ultra compares pretty favorably to the 9700 Pro using the newest drivers.

And the time differential between the newest drivers and the release of the card is how long? It may still help, but it's still not very nice to the people who actually bought the card to make them wait for speed increases which may affect a multitude of games, unlike actual drivers issues which affect one game at a certain setting.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,095
513
126
What is so unimpressive about these benchmarks? It looks like the thing is flying and did you see the FS2004 screenshots? It looks like Nvidia cleaned up their AA also. Wooohooo!

Looks solid atm but will await more reviews to make a final judgement.

 

Killrose

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 1999
6,230
8
81
Ugghh...i'm bored already. This is a dissapointment. This better be fake, or crappy drivers, or something, because this is not worth upgrading to if you have a 9700pro/5900U and up. And that is being polite.
 

jasonja

Golden Member
Feb 22, 2001
1,864
0
0
<yawn> Now bring on the 420... so we can cheer or boo for it.

What's even more sad is that this is the Ultra version too.
 

vladik007

Member
May 18, 2003
70
0
0
This HAS to be fake , they POSSIBLY cant suk this badly. Who cares how Quake 3 engine runs , we're still getting good frame rates with fx5700 with tha engine.

Look at Far Cry 1.1 , they just HARDLY even things up with 9800XT , only to run AA one notch higher. This HAS to be fake , i cant see nVIDIA making all this fuss for this marginal bump in the azz.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |