Originally posted by: SniperDaws
Originally posted by: chizow
756MHz did end up giving me Delta errors with ATItool, so I dropped it back down to 729MHz and going on 7 minutes now with no errors. Core temps up to 75C @ 50% fan speed. Gonna try playing with the shader/memory clocks for a bit and stick with 729MHz core. What are you running your fan at and what are your temps?
Does it feel any faster than your GTS ?
Kinda.....
In areas/situations I never really saw any slowdown anyways, I can definitely see the difference in FPS (only via FPS monitoring), but in laggy/crowded situations the FPS still plummet. I've only really run LOTRO (new update so been very busy raiding etc.) and my FPS in Raid situations is around 20 FPS minimum. With the GTS it could hit as low as 14 FPS at times. This is with Ultra High settings at 1920. Still playable frames in LOTRO, but not for FPS titles. So overall I'd say it feels faster, but nothing earth-shattering like going from a previous generation card to a G80. At this point I'm not even sure a GTX would.
There's a few titles I have that show bigger differences in benchmarks so I'll try and make some comparisons this weekend along with 169.04 GTS comparisons with RT OCs. As of right now though, not really impressed with the GT's performance scaling while OC'd. After looking over some of the other benchmarks (600MHz vs. OC'd GT variants), it seems the GT doesn't scale nearly as well as the GTS/GTX. Not sure if its the fewer ROPs, bandwidth/bus, or texture memory causing the bottleneck but hopefully the upgraded G92 GTS sheds more light on this (with potentially more ROPs, more RAM, more shaders).
Also tried bumping the memory up to 1050MHz and it ran ATITool without problems for 15-16 minutes but caused a lock-up after about 30 minutes of LOTRO. Bumped it back down to 1000MHz and ran for 6 hours without a hitch.