He didn't say anything of the sort. But when Average Joe sees a drive for 499 and another similar device for 599, which gets bought? Doesn't matter what the specs are or who made it, the cheaper one usually gets purchased.
Reviews of several Android tablets have been pretty positive too, FYI. AT reviewed both the Xoom and Transformer positively remember.
We will be seeing some cool stuff from Android tablets this summer/fall/winter though.
I didn't read any Transformer reviews but the Xoom can only be said as lukewarm at best. I don't know about anyone else but when the majority of web sites list the Xoom as having a decent promised hardware set but needs a few more months of baking because the software does not allow you to use the full hardware capabilities that's hardly positive. Not to mention the crashes.
I don't think it's all about pricing. There are cheaper Android tablets on the market (price wise) but they simply haven't sold as well as Apple's iPad. I think this is partially due to the Apple brand but also because Android tablets prior to Honeycomb simply weren't up to the feature set and quality of the iPad. Even the Xoom at launch was not a solid competitor due to software issues. I'm sure the latest Honeycomb tablets out now or coming soon will better compete and even have a better feature set than the iPad 2. But to compete, it'll have to be cheaper than the iPad on top of having more features IMHO. At least if it wants to make any huge inroads on the more mainstream consumers rather than techie types.
Well, duh. The only reason Apple has been able to sell them at this price point is because Apple could sell shit on a platter and people would pay whatever Steve Jobs told them to pay for it.
And the reverse is true. The iPhone was arguably the best mobile smart phone at the time of its release for general consumers but people who hate Apple called it shit. The iPad 1 & 2 were the best tablets at the time of their release. Arguably even now no Android tablet can compete due to the feature set on top of the software application support but people will call anything Apple releases as shit no matter how good/solid it is.
Apple's products are very rarely better than the rest. They have better marketing that leads you to believe that their products are superior when they really aren't. Exceptions would be the first iPhone and iPods. Those products were ground breaking. Everything else is like "hey look at this pretty logo, you know that makes it better than everything else, right?"
Not being better does not make it "shit on a platter" as you've previously stated. Your words imply that Apple makes mostly crap. The fact is that while Apple is not always the best in terms of feature or price, it does usually give you a solid product with a decent feature set that satisfy the needs of general consumers. Have there been a few clunkers from Apple? Of course. But most of their products are pretty solid and as much as people say Apple isn't an innovative company they have a trend of putting together previous technologies into a cohesive whole that works pretty well.
Their forte is and likely always will be the user experience. They created a lot of the paradigms we take for granted that is used in modern desktop OS's and they did the same for mobile touch based OS's. A lot of their products are designed with usability in mind. Not for technological superiority. Look at their award winning products and you'll see this design philosophy in both software and hardware.
Btw. I get ice cream cones at McD not cuz they're the best, but cuz they're good enough and only 69 fucking cents each.
Remember, TWO ways to succeed in business: BETTER, or CHEAPER.
Agreed. I go to Ikea for lunch sometimes cause a soda, chips, and two dogs are $2. Either make your product so cheap that people can't help but buy it even if it's not better or so good that people will pay more for it. History is filled with superior products that simply lost due to price.
At this point, Android tablets are competitive from a hardware feature and price perspective but it's not so much better (and many would argue inferior) to the iPad 2. It's also not cheap enough that most interested would pass over an iPad 2 for an Android tablet.