NVIDIA Pascal Thread

[antihelten]

http://www.anandtech.com/show/7166/nvidia-announces-quadro-k6000

Quadro K6000 launched with full 2880 CUDA cores enabled.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/9096/nvidia-announces-quadro-m6000-quadro-vca-2015

http://www.anandtech.com/show/10179/nvidia-announces-24gb-quadro-m6000

Quadro M6000 launched with full 3072 CUDA cores enabled.

Quadro P6000(?) will launched with all 3840 CUDA cores enabled and hopefully with 8 stack HBM2 for 32GB of RAM in mass production, since you don't want to ship a 16GB Quadro flagship a year after you shipped the Quadro M6000 24GB.

Quadro K6000 used the GK180, which is just a slightly tweaked revision of GK110, and it launched 8 months after the first GK110 equipped Tesla card

Quadro M6000 launched a few days after Titan X, but then again GM200 was never a compute focused chip, and as such is probably a poor example to compare with in regards to GP100.

That means we can probably expect at least an 8 month gap between a Tesla GP100 and a fully unlocked Quadro GP100, which would put it around Q4 2017. At that point you're getting awfully close to Navi and Volta.

 

[Head1985]

Same dude posted GTX1070 benchmarks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uALJVMr0Xc&nohtml5=False
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7Lf1Wmt4f8&nohtml5=False
From them 1070=GTX980TI around 1400-1500Mhz

 

[ShintaiDK]

Looks like a 980TI in my eyes.

 

[Timmah!]

There's only so far you can cut though before it starts to not make sense.

The P100 is 56 SMs. I bet they could sell a 50-52 SM cheaper Tesla and then 45-50 Quadros sometime in early 2017.

Theoretically the full GP104 is 40? (2560). I guess doing 2560 cores with high clock speeds shouldn't be a surprise but at 300 mm2 it's way too big for the price range anticipated. This node is going to be all about transistor usage efficiency and it looks bad for nVidia right now. Maybe that's why Volta also has shown up on the radar so soon because nVidia knows that Pascal is basically Fermi 2.0.

Anticipated price range is (sadly) 500 - 600 EUROs. 300 mm2 is way too big even for that?

 

[Kris194]

Same dude posted GTX1070 benchmarks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uALJVMr0Xc&nohtml5=False
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7Lf1Wmt4f8&nohtml5=False
From them 1070=GTX980TI around 1400-1500Mhz

That's overclocked GTX 980 Ti. It's not hard to create something like this.

 

[jpiniero]

Anticipated price range is (sadly) 500 - 600 EUROs. 300 mm2 is way too big even for that?

Obviously the price of the full Polaris 10 would play some part in the pricing but I would have to think nVidia is going to want at least $649 or $699.

It is still unclear why GP104 (and Pascal in general) it is so big though if it's only 2560 cores, so maybe there is something to justify the size and we just don't know about it.

 

[Head1985]

300mm2 is not BIG.Its same size like was GTX680 also on new node.
Btw GTX680 cost 500USD

 

[Aristotelian]

There isn't going to be a consumer part that uses GP100.

Isn't the Titan X based on GP200 along with the 980Ti? Why should the 1080Ti not be based on the GP100?

Besides that - all rumours are now pointing to replacements for the 970/980, but I'm hearing nothing about a 980Ti replacement, which must certainly mean that the 980Ti is still selling well?

 

[jpiniero]

Why should the 1080Ti not be based on the GP100?

I don't think they could get away with selling a $2K Titan. It'd have to be that much since the dies are so big and this node so expensive.

As for a 980 Ti replacement, if the X80 is faster than the 980 Ti even if it's not by much there's not much point in leaving the 980 Ti in the market.

 

[SPBHM]

Isn't the Titan X based on GP200 along with the 980Ti? Why should the 1080Ti not be based on the GP100?

Besides that - all rumours are now pointing to replacements for the 970/980, but I'm hearing nothing about a 980Ti replacement, which must certainly mean that the 980Ti is still selling well?

you mean GM200, the problem is GP100 is more like GK210 (compute, FP64 beast) which Nvidia never used as a Geforce, so who knows if they are not changing their strategy,

still I would expect a GP100 variant to become titan (and later a 780/980 ti) or something, like it happened before.

 

[airfathaaaaa]

Isn't the Titan X based on GP200 along with the 980Ti? Why should the 1080Ti not be based on the GP100?

Besides that - all rumours are now pointing to replacements for the 970/980, but I'm hearing nothing about a 980Ti replacement, which must certainly mean that the 980Ti is still selling well?

before p100 annc all the rumors where saying from alien spieces invadint home users gpu's to a tiny powerfull consumers card

90% of them were way off

nothing that we have heard those past 2 days are to be believed unless we are near june

 

[el etro]

GP102 makes all sense then. A Modified GP100 without heavy FP64 support.

 

[kithylin]

[<snip>
Same dude posted GTX1070 benchmarks
<snip>
From them 1070=GTX980TI around 1400-1500Mhz

Since you're obviously his friend posting for him to try and get views on his videos, please.. don't. It's very obvious he just renamed the 980ti in the nvidia inf file for latest drivers and made a video of it. Anyone knows how to do this and these are quite obviously faked.

We all know it.. Why would you two even bother trying to get away with this?

Are you and your friend really so desperate for 2000 views on a youtube video that you would sink to this low? *sigh*

 

[finbarqs]

Since you're obviously his friend posting for him to try and get views on his videos, please.. don't. It's very obvious he just renamed the 980ti in the nvidia inf file for latest drivers and made a video of it. Anyone knows how to do this and these are quite obviously faked.

We all know it.. Why would you two even bother trying to get away with this?

Are you and your friend really so desperate for 2000 views on a youtube video that you would sink to this low? *sigh*

Not to mention how much trouble he'd get into... Nvidia NDA's are not to be messed with... If it got leaked out, it would be hell to pay.... I remember testing all sorts of shit for Nvidia when I worked a PC Boutique...

 

[JDG1980]

That's overclocked GTX 980 Ti. It's not hard to create something like this.

The "Memory Used" graph gives it away. You can tell from the ratio that it's for a 6GB card.

 

[Adored]

1070 is a bigger giveaway, nobody can seriously believe that'll be the name of the card surely.

 

[Sweepr]

Multiple sources around the world, as well as our own, are saying that NVIDIA will unveil their next-gen video cards in the coming weeks. With Computex right around the corner, this makes perfect sense.

www.tweaktown.com/news/51529/nvidia-reveal-next-gen-geforce-10k-video-cards-coming-weeks/index.html

 

[Kris194]

10K = designed for 10K resolution? That would be neat Seriously, name sounds well from a marketing standpoint.

 

[kithylin]

10K = designed for 10K resolution? That would be neat Seriously, name sounds well from a marketing standpoint.

I'm surprised someone hasn't said this yet...

Play 1080p on GTX 1080?

 

[Silverforce11]

www.tweaktown.com/news/51529/nvidia-reveal-next-gen-geforce-10k-video-cards-coming-weeks/index.html

LOL I think we already know they will announce at Computex.

The only question is will there be actually retail availability or a paper launch until Q3 like the original Bitsandchips leak a few months ago said. Btw, that leak is spot on so far for GP100 Tesla and interposer size. They claimed ~1200mm2 interposer, when nobody saw that coming nor even thought it was possible this early.

 

[Sweepr]

LOL I think we already know they will announce at Computex.

They are suggesting the cards will be unveiled before Computex.

NVIDIA will unveil its next-gen GeForce video cards in the next couple of weeks (NASDAQ:NVDA)

 

[Silverforce11]

"Multiple sources around the world, as well as our own, are saying that NVIDIA will unveil their next-gen video cards in the coming weeks. With Computex right around the corner, this makes perfect sense."

Coming weeks, cos Computex is coming up soon... that's how I interpret that. But if you want to believe it's earlier, up to you.

 

[Adored]

Just linking the same stuff from another site doesn't make it any more valid Sweepr. It's clearly just echo chamber bs desperate for hits, and not even well done at that. I'm sure if you follow the trail back it'll end up at Fudzilla or Digitimes as the original source, citing "sources".

Note I'm not saying it won't be true, just that there is literally zero new news here.

 

[Kris194]

Exactly, they clearly point on Computex what we heard several times this week.

 

[Sweepr]

I believe in a Computex announcement considering most rumours are telling that and it makes perfect sense. Regarding this particular rumour, coming weeks could mean at or before Computex (which is almost 2 months away).