Sorry Adam, you just can't catch a break... Your Titan X's are a joke, and your SS is just a Malibu. Life must be tough on you...
It's a common theme of mine. Oh and..
http://www.overclock.net/t/1592431/...ctx-12-asynchronous-shading/660#post_24962556
Atleast I can admit I was wrong about Fiji unlike you whose astonishing quotes are in the signatures of so many people you argued with. You never ever acknowledge how stupid and arrogant your statements were. Yet you continue with the same rubbish. I cannot hold a candle to you. You are the best
I'll just have to make do with this life.
Lets see what you write on SeekingAlpha. Here is a few of your gems:
http://shintai.ambition.cz/raghu78.png
http://shintai.ambition.cz/raghu78-2.png
http://shintai.ambition.cz/raghu78-3.png
Shame using your raghu78 or real name wasn't enough so you had to rename it
You are a big time AMD hyper and AMD stock plumber. But I doubt you even own any stock yourself. Because if you believe what you write, everything you own must be in AMD stock. So I think that settles everything in the future from you.
Pascal looks to be shown of at Computex and scheduled for early june. And that's the news we have to go by for now.
http://www.techpowerup.com/220372/nvidia-to-unveil-pascal-at-the-2016-computex.html
It's a fairly standard definition of mid in the world of tech, even the mighty Apple uses it
So you hate well-run businesses? You do realize that AMD would love to be in the position that NVIDIA is in right?
finally something we agree upon. Zen to the largest extent and Polaris will decide on AMD's long term survival. I know I don't want AMD to go away. I want competition as its in the best interest of the consumer. So yeah I do root for AMD. :thumbsup:Reasonable and I'm largely in agreement. We'll know by the end of the year how good these products that AMD is betting the farm on are
You only prove my point. You take everything from Kollock as gospel.
Whats the track history of the company? Star Swarm Mantle demo for AMD. AOTS DX12 (20000 copies) for AMD?
So what else did they make?
They are forcing Async Compute as a default setting for nVidia user with the latest beta version which decreases the performance without giving them a)the information about it and b)an option within the game. So if you dont read all the reviews and find out which setting you need to change in the ini file the DX12 performance will always be slower on their hardware.
I don't think that they are "forcing" it, are they?
They are forcing Async Compute as a default setting for nVidia user with the latest beta version which decreases the performance without giving them a)the information about it and b)an option within the game. So if you dont read all the reviews and find out which setting you need to change in the ini file the DX12 performance will always be slower on their hardware.
I owned a pair of Titan X's at one point but they wouldn't overclock for beans, I was very disappointed when the pair of 980 Tis in my other system ran circles around 'em
I thought the joke was so well done that I bought four of them. The joke is on me now.
Really, I don't care much for 3rd party developed PCBs. I care more about having four fully unlocked Maxwell cores that has served me well for a year now.
I didn't think that a 980ti could stomp a titanx (in absolute performance, not per dollar). I plan to watercool and heavily overclock two (at least) of the next gen flagships. If nvidia releases a 32gb titanx successor around broadwell-e release I'll find it tough not to buy a few. Especially since I'll be back stateside in April for a bit - hint hint nvidia ;-)
Business ethics and fair practices matter.
Dig into AMD's history over the last decade or so. If after doing so you think this is a goodie-two-shoes "ethical" company, then I don't know what to tell you. This company has destroyed billions in shareholder wealth, particularly under Hector Ruiz (though Rory Read did a great job of taking the stock down from ~$8/sh to just $2 and change). This is more harmful than misstating some memory specs and showing off non-working prototypes at a trade show ever could be.
And if you think that such "shareholder wealth" destruction only impacts a few people, think again. AMD stock is/was held by a lot of mutual funds, employees of the company (who were compensated with stock), AMD retirees, etc. It was AMD management's job to try to protect and grow those people's investments and they failed big-time.
They say things like "Fury X is an overclockers dream" when it wasn't, try to dupe people into thinking Zen will have >40% IPC improvement over XV when they conveniently put that claim under the "data center" box in their slide (meaning the comparison is to Piledriver, their last gen server CPU), they say with a straight face to investors that Carrizo is a super great product and show that it's "better" than Broadwell by showing a corner case (HEVC decode), management rewarding themselves with random multi-million dollar bonuses when the stock hits new lows, etc.
This is just the tip of the iceberg, the more you dig, the more dirt you'll find on AMD.
Anyway, this is way OT so I'm going to shut up now, but if you wanna talk to me about "ethical" companies, AMD is the last example you really ought to use.
I will just add one more point, JMD a former AMD employee misguided many people here regarding BD that it will have "increased ipc". After the BD fiasco he was never seen again.
Nice. I really like your sense of humor.
Do you have 2 of those titans X disabled, or are you enjoying the downgrade in performance with more than 2way sli negative scaling?
I'm not sure where you got your information from. Having three or four cards does not cause negative scaling with most things. Especially at 3840x2160.
Once again... What you state is not true.They are forcing Async Compute as a default setting for nVidia user with the latest beta version which decreases the performance without giving them a)the information about it and b)an option within the game. So if you dont read all the reviews and find out which setting you need to change in the ini file the DX12 performance will always be slower on their hardware.
Once again... What you state is not true.
Oxide left Async on, by default, to place both IHVs on equal footing. Since NVIDIA expose the feature as being available in their driver, then perhaps you might want to email NVIDIA for more info on this feature.
Once the game ships, whichever option works best will be the one turned on by default.
The only 12_1 feature that can boost performance is CR (Conservative Rasterization). Not CR itself but the fact that CR can allow for VXGI ambient occlusion. Which is an AO tied to Gameworks licensing schemes. CR is not really a feature you'd use in a RTS game. It's something you'd use in an FPS shooter or open world game.So why Oxide did not use DX12.1 features in which Nvidia and Intel are focusing? It is because AMD does not support that and the result will end up like Just Cause 3 and GOW on AMD cards.
Oxide plan this game with AMD before even Dx12 came out and use AC because they know AMD is strong in that feature which is fine. It is gaming evolve program and it is fine to use feature which AMD is best on it.
The only 12_1 feature that can boost performance is CR (Conservative Rasterization). Not CR itself but the fact that CR can allow for VXGI ambient occlusion. Which is an AO tied to Gameworks licensing schemes. CR is not really a feature you'd use in a RTS game. It's something you'd use in an FPS shooter or open world game.
ROV, would cause performance to tank.
As for Just Cause 3, it's a DX11 game. It might get a DX12 patch. I don't see AMD doing poorly under Just Cause 3 do you?
Oh boy,It does and go check out steam page. It has stutter problem on AMD due that game do not use Dx12.1 features.
http://wccftech.com/dx12-3-pc-gbuffer-conservative-rasterization/
http://wccftech.com/codemasters-ego...ter-ordered-views-conservative-rasterization/
Even Intel is focusing on Dx12.1 ,however, only AMD do not support. Oxide and every normal developers knows that nvidia is not good in computing but AMD is good so they went with it to promote AMD and its features.
That is why ATOS is non selling and i grantee that this game wont even near 50K sales. Only AMD fanboys will buy this game and save these developers from near bankruptcy. They only made this game to promote AMD.
I'm not sure where you got your information from. Having three or four cards does not cause negative scaling with most things. Especially at 3840x2160.