I dont even know what you are going on about. It makes little sense. I never buy the high end. I am in the 300 dollar range for cards.
Or better still if you are that desperate for E-PEEN purposes to pay beyond the odds for something so your favourite 4company CEO can buy another Porsche,how about the rest of us act like good consumers and make sure companies like Nvidia or AMD don't plonk out cards which are priced beyond the odds,and then you and the like minded people can donate 1000s of dollars,Euro or Pounds to AMD or Nvidia,so you can feel validated you bought something expensive and overpriced.
Everybody is happy.
OFC,then don't complain when games companies target the mass market "console peasant" crowd and your £4000 graphics card hits a cinematic locked 30FPS.
What are you babbling about? Go look at what I was responding to and get back to us.
So basically we are buying small die,overpriced gaming chips to subsidise their large die compute chips for the non-gaming market.
Probably more of the same when Vega comes out for AMD.
Now,it all comes together.
Sure they can fit a few Porsches and leather jackets into all that too.
Nobody is forced to buy a product. So no, peasants dont have to pay for anything.
What are you babbling about? Go look at what I was responding to and get back to us.
I need to show off on the internet I am rich despite so I can feel better about my life.
Welps, there you have it.
The results suggested that Apple was actually stimulating the same parts of the brain as religious imagery does in people of faith.
Internet stonk man indeed.
Welps,I still seem desperate to want to pay more for something that is of no importance for a gamer.
If the GP100 can barely sustain itself as a project,then why do gamers need to pay for it in increased card prices??
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13416598
Then,what are you bambling about then?? More E-PEEN. You seem desperate to accuse somebody of being a peasant when they called some of you out on how these poor companies need moar money.
You seem quite desperate to want to pay more for cards??
Why??
Internet stonk man indeed.
Welps,YOU still seem desperate to want to pay more for something that is of no importance for a gamer.
If the GP100 can barely sustain itself as a project,then why do gamers need to pay for it in increased card prices??
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13416598
Don't bother replying - it will be more "I want to pay over the odds for electronics".
I think AMD,Nvidia and Intel have found their ideal consumer markets!
It is almost like I am talking to AMD and Nvidia shareholders or employees.
Waits for AMD fans to say 232MM2 Polaris should be £400 if it beats a Fury X massively.
Stonk? Haha. Okay.
I got pulled over once for a moving violation. Officer asked me "Can you afford this ticket?" I replied "yes." He repeated his question a little confused, "Are you telling me you can afford this ticket?" Again, I said "Yes" but added "just because I can afford it doesn't mean I want it."
I'm all for cheaper products, I mean, who isn't? I don't get why me buying something I can afford and not even thick twice about gets some people like you worked up. If you can't afford it, why is that my fault or problem? Go harass Huang/Su, I mean it's them, according to, buying the jets and boats, not me.
But the man pictured here is Ingvar Kamprad, the reclusive Swedish founder of Ikea. And he is worth £15.7billion.
That makes him the world's seventh richest man, but the 81-year-old admits he is still "a bit tight" with money.
He takes easyJet flights, drives himself around in a 15-year-old Volvo, and has furnished his modest house almost entirely with Ikea items - which he assembled himself.
When Galaxy S6 owners upgrading to Galaxy S7 nobody cares. When upgrading your GPU (if not AMD) everyone losing their minds.
JHH said it in his latest keynote while revealing P100.
Thanks.they said the gp100 had a cost of 3bil and they expected to make some more money out of it
I like making company profit margins higher and if it does not happen:
RS has been saying the same for years and he was proved correct with 28NM. Many didn't listen to him.
But remember don't complain when all the PC games get developed for consoles first and you have games framelocked to 30FPS. That is the future you are promoting.
Oh, you're of his flock. Gotcha.
As someone who is loving playing once exclusive console titles on his PC, getting 60 FPS @ 1080p (due to them lazy devs man!), I don't see myself complaining.
Glad we had this chat
Thanks.
On the face of it, seems quite high. Wonder about the accounting used. This number, if taken at face value, allows me to see why some would say AMD can't compete.
Margins and market share highest in history and "expect to make some more money". Consider me skeptical. Sounds like a sales pitch for justifying high prices.
its way to high for their hpc department to even meet 3bil on one year... i mean they will have to build 13 oak ridge style supercomputers to even reach 3bil....(its safe to say they gonna milk the ^%&^% out of the consumers for this)
Some people say that R&D costs are rising and that's the reason why the prices raised. Are you blind or do you simply believe in every word that company says? In about 3 years, R&D costs raised by about 15% but somehow their Gross Operating Profit raised by about 24%.
http://investor.nvidia.com/financials-statements.cfm
im not acting nothing its their words not mine they didnt said "oh we threw 3 bill to the pascal arch" they said we threw 3bill into the "hpc"You act like zero of the R&D went into "gaming".
Year Ending Year Ending
Jan 2013 Jan 2011
Revenue 4.28B 3.54B
Cost of Revenue 1.83B 1.95B
Gross Operating Profit 2.45B 1.60B