NVIDIA Pascal Thread

[IllogicalGlory]

Because 3Dmark reports base clocks.

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/9879250
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/9924726

No such thing, it is a bug by 3dmark for unidentified cards. Same case as last time for unreleased cards.

Yeah, here's another Generic VGA

Read a bit more carefully next time.

 

[Det0x]

. Also worthy of note is the 545mhz clock speed recorded above. After we’ve done a bit of digging around we found that in most cases when 3DMark does not fully identify the graphics card in question it will report a ~540mhz clock speed, despite whatever the actual clock speed of the card is.

So in this case and indeed in all the following entries you will see 540mhz erroneously reported as the GPU frequency because 3DMark failed to read the actual clock speed of the card, possibly as the result of a BIOS misread. This can be confirmed by looking at some other misidentified GTX 970 and GTX 980 entries with a recorded clock speed of 540mhz. Which also happen to show performance figures that are on par with what’s normally expected of these cards at their boost frequencies. Really no where near what they would score at ~540mhz.

http://wccftech.com/nvidia-pascal-3dmark-11-entries-spotted/

 

[ShintaiDK]

maybe it is 8gb gtx980...

With GTX980TI speed?

 

[casiofx]

With GTX980TI speed?

980ti had a graphics score of over 20k
This card is 15k

980ti speed not found

 

[jantjeuh]

Disappointing if true and accurate.

 

[ShintaiDK]

980ti had a graphics score of over 20k
This card is 15k

980ti speed not found

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/11061015

Says 19589 here.

Note there are 2 driver versions.
Driver version 10.18.13.6723 for 15K and 10.18.13.6744 for 19½K

 

[happy medium]

1080Mobile @ gtx980ti speeds.
Mobile cards will release first.

that's my take. New cards will be fast!

gtx1060 = overclocked 970
1070= overclocked 980ti
1080 = 2x gtx980 (not sli)

 

[moonbogg]

1080Mobile @ gtx980ti speeds.
Mobile cards will release first.

that's my take. New cards will be fast!

gtx1060 = overclocked 970
1070= overclocked 980ti
1080 = 2x gtx980 (not sli)

That would be crazy as hell. If they can do that with mobile, then desktop will shred hard. Imagine running VR on a laptop? You can go mobile and look like a douche on the bus wearing that silly thing. GO ANYWHERE.

 

[Sweepr]

'Geforce GTX1070' was purely speculation from WCCFTech, might be other model. We've had rumours about 2 Pascal GPUs being launched after Computex. This could very well be GP106 or a low-clocked GP104 ES, who knows. Funny that when another company is rumoured to launch VGAs with the same/worse performance than their previous enthusiast SKUs but improved perf/watt (and perf/$?) they get a lot of praise, when it's NVIDIA people jump at trollish 'epic fail' comments.

 

[kagui]

just for reference .

http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphi...Full-Memory-Structure-and-Limitations-GTX-970

if you take the 970 diagram and double it to reach 7.5 gb you get something like this

Every SM have 128 cuda cores,

 

[IllogicalGlory]

These aren't mobile. They have desktop CPUs and desktop motherboards.

Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. H67M-D2-B3
ASRock Z170 Extreme6

For the "980 Ti" and "970" respectively.

 

[moonbogg]

Two big pascals will wreck 1440p pretty hard. Hopefully some good games come out, because otherwise...well, I'll probably get them anyway.

 

[happy medium]

'Geforce GTX1070' was purely speculation from WCCFTech, might be other model. We've had rumours about 2 Pascal GPUs being launched after Computex. This could very well be GP106 or a low-clocked GP104 ES, who knows. Funny that when another company is rumoured to launch VGAs with the same/worse performance than their previous enthusiast SKUs but improved perf/watt (and perf/$?) they get a lot of praise, when it's NVIDIA people jump at trollish 'epic fail' comments.

Its nice to dream.......

anyway mobile parts will release first.

You need to read the whole article , they are not low end cards.

 

[happy medium]

Two big pascals will wreck 1440p pretty hard. Hopefully some good games come out, because otherwise...well, I'll probably get them anyway.

I hope they have some Async compute Engines......D:

 

[jpiniero]

These aren't mobile. They have desktop CPUs and desktop motherboards.

Yeah. Looking at it a bit more, I'd say odds are decent that this is Pascal but you really can't really deduce much from it if you can't trust the clock speed information.

 

[Bloodpetal]

Pretty excited to see the Pascal cards coming down the way. Looking at the stats, they claim improved efficiency and higher performance on certain things, but it's hard to tell if any of it really affects gaming at all. Guess we have to wait a couple weeks.

 

[Silverforce11]

As soon as AIBs get their hands onto the ES, you can expect some more concrete leaks, with game benches.

At the very least, concrete leaks should be available ~2 months from release.

 

[Game_dev]

If NVIDIA launches in May with a 4096 core chip, they will drown in money. With AMd already hinting that they won't have a high end chip until sometime next year, it may be time for me to buy a lot of NVIDIA stock.

 

[casiofx]

If NVIDIA launches in May with a 4096 core chip, they will drown in money. With AMd already hinting that they won't have a high end chip until sometime next year, it may be time for me to buy a lot of NVIDIA stock.

AMD demoed polaris 10 with speeds of 980ti/furyX. So your next year is 2016?

How much Nvidia paid you to spread so many thread crapping posts?

 

[happy medium]

AMD demoed polaris 10 with speeds of 980ti/furyX

I think he means AMD better have something more than a Polaris 10 vs a 4096 core chip that more than likely will be much faster than a gtx980ti/Fury x.

 

[Game_dev]

AMD demoed polaris 10 with speeds of 980ti/furyX. So your next year is 2016?

How much Nvidia paid you to spread so many thread crapping posts?

AMD finally having a 980ti competitor hardly inspires confidence. A 4096 Pascal could double that.

 

[casiofx]

AMD finally having a 980ti competitor hardly inspires confidence. A 4096 Pascal could double that.

And your point is?
Nvidia tested engineering sample isn't even big pascal. Just like 980ti released much later. AMD have vega

 

[3DVagabond]

No such thing, it is a bug by 3dmark for unidentified cards. Same case as last time for unreleased cards.

Sorry to shatter your hope for a card that'll double the performance, lol

They had to get that 2x efficiency some how. /s

 

[casiofx]

They had to get that 2x efficiency some how. /s

We can get 2x efficiency by having the same performance of 980ti but half the power consumption.

Maybe the reason some people are disappointed is because they want the big pascal. Same like people disappointed on polaris not being the fury x replacement

 

[alcoholbob]

Nvidia launching 16FF+ products one year later about the new node is available: don't makes sense;

Nvidia launching its biggest GPU first on a one year node(the 16FF+): Made all make sense.

Only the metal gates are 16nm with TSMC 16FF+, the silicon is still the 20nm that TSMC was demoing all the way back in 2011-2012, TSMC has literally been making silicon on this manufacturing process for 5+ years Im not surprised they are ready for a big die by Q1 2017, its literally year 6 on this process since they first taped out working commercial silicon.