Sure, here you go: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_gtx_1080/
Not my scores, I don't own one.. but max clocks are there. That's what the site's about.
Anybody with the GTX1080 want to post their max stable overclocks?
If you looked at all of the results shown in this article, there isn't too much need for a conclusion... Many of the GeForce GTX 1080 numbers were phenomenal and represented huge improvements over the GeForce 900 "Maxwell" graphics cards and only furthering the performance advantage NVIDIA has over AMD on Linux, particularly for OpenGL when factoring in the respective company's drivers.
Not only was the GeForce GTX 1080 performing great with the raw performance in OpenGL, OpenCL, and Vulkan games and applications, but the performance-per-Watt was also nothing short of astonishing. In a few of the performance-per-Watt results, it was incredible to see how much further ahead Pascal has put NVIDIA even compared to just Maxwell cards from last year.
GP100-A01P / GP100-VSXB-24-A1-5X
GP100-890-A1
GP102-400-A1
GP104-200-A1 / GP104-PS-NB ASUS teaser?
GP104-200-A1 / GP104-PR-DT / GeForce GTX 1070 / dev_id 1B81
GP104-200-A1 / GP104-PS-DT
GP104-400-A1 / GP104-PR-DT/ GeForce GTX 1080 / dev_id 1B80
GP104-400-A1 / GP104-PS-DT
GP104-725-A1 / GP104-PS-DT
GP104-950-KD-A1 / GP104-PR-DT
GP104-975-A1 / GP104-QS-9XX
GP104-985-A1 / GP104-QS-9XX
GP106-300-A1 / GP106-QS-V0-F0-300-V1
GP106-400-A1 / GP106-QS-400-V1
GP106-750-A1 / GP106-QS-750
My prediction is safe. Feel free to remove my quote from your sig at anytime.
Or the production standard gets worse to meet demand, I have seen that happen all the time over the years.I won't be surprised if a golden sample once 16FF matures hits 2.4 GHz on air.
I won't be surprised if a golden sample once 16FF matures hits 2.4 GHz on air.
People get so caught up in 5% to 10% gains in existing hardware. I've been playing this hardware game for a while. I've learned long ago that it's best to enjoy what you have now during any hardware generation. The hardware that's released in the near future is going to make the small overclock gains on existing hardware seem futile.
Buy now, enjoy now. Wait for gains in the next significant release.
You replace your SLI setup every 6-9 months with new releases?
You replace your SLI setup every 6-9 months with new releases?
The cooling results again show that NVIDIA has installed a cooling solution that easily handles the thermals on the GTX 1070 Founders Edition. The three heat pipe-based cooler does well enough that the delivered temperatures when the fan speeds are maxed out is only two degrees warmer than MSI's righteous Twin Frozr V cooler, albeit a bit noisier in the sound department. This is a significant achievement with a blower-style cooler. The other upside is that the blower-style cooling solution used on NVIDIA's top tier Pascal architecture cards directs the thermal load outside the chassis, reducing any heat build up in the chassis. You can point to this as a win, but with the way chassis are built for clear directed airflow, the larger coolers have a place in the ecosystem.
Noise levels are quite impressive on the GTX 1070 Founders Edition card using the old ears. Much like the GTX 1080, the GTX 1070 does ramp up fairly quickly when under load with a noise commitment that is much like that of the GTX Titan X and GTX 980 Ti. Cranking up the fan speeds when overclocked does bring a higher noise commitment to the equation, but you get the benefit of significantly improved cooling. Ultimately, 57 °C is not a bad number as lower temperatures equal higher core clock speeds on the GTX 1070.
One of the key targets for NVIDIA over the past few generations has been to reduce the power consumption of its architecture, especially after taking a lot of heat (figurativley) on the Fermi launch for both the power and thermal results. With each successive generation, the power consumption curves keep getting better. Now serving up Pascal to the user base, NVIDIA has delivered solid gains in power efficiency. Looking at a direct comparison between the GTX 970 and GTX 1070, the power consumption reported with the GTX 1070 is the hands down winner. At stock speeds, the margin is just 18 watts under load. When overclocked, the GTX 1070 shows a massive 44 watt improvement over the GTX 970. Pretty impressive, to say the least.
...The best possible core clock speed/memory speed I was able to wring from this GPU was a solid 2050MHz to 2063MHz under load at the maximum reported temperatures. If I could keep the core temperature another 10 °C cooler, the card will run at 2126MHz all day long. Overclocking would not be used if it did not have an added benefit. With stock speeds on the GTX 1070 Founders Edition offering GTX Titan X performance for a fraction of the cost, you can do even better than Titan X performance in many games. Overclocking the GTX Titan X does even up the field, but it's amazing that for a potential AIB card price of $379, you cannot go wrong.
Launching June 10, the GTX 1070 Founders Edition will be available for $449. Much like the GTX 1080, the GTX 1070 has got style, runs cool and quiet, and is tough to beat at the current pricing.
Game Ready:
- Get the optimal experience for Mirror’s Edge Catalyst and Edge of Nowhere.
Gaming Technology:
- Supports the new GeForce GTX 1070 graphics card which delivers the incredible speed and power of NVIDIA Pascal—the most advanced GPU ever created. This is the ultimate gaming platform.
Virtual Reality:
- Supports the new GeForce GTX 1080 and GTX 1070 VR Works features including Lens Matched Shading and Single Pass Stereo
New Features:
NVIDIA published the OpenGL extensions that expose the Pascal GPU architecture’s new hardware features. The extensions are available on GeForce GTX 1070 and GeForce GTX 1080 GPUs starting with the Release 367 drivers.
- Single Pass Stereo: GL_NV_stereo_view_rendering
- Lens Matched Shading: GL_NV_clip_space_w_scaling
- Improved Conservative Rasterization: GL_NV_conservative_raster_pre_snap_triangles
- Double Precision Atomic Operations: GL_NV_shader_atomic_float64
Added or updated the following SLI profiles:
- Everybody's Gone to the Rapture - updated
- Homefront: The Revolution - added
- Mirror's Edge: Catalyst - updated
- The Witcher 3 - updated
- Total War: WARHAMMER - added
Overclocker's Club compared three of the fastest VGAs right now, with and without overclock in several different games.
Summary of Performance - 1440P Overclocked:
GTX 1070 is 3% faster than GTX 980 Ti
GTX 1080 is 23% faster than GTX 980 Ti
GTX 1070 is 27% faster than R9 Fury
GTX 1080 is 47% faster than R9 Fury
GTX 1070 is 31% faster than GTX 980
GTX 1080 is 51% faster than GTX 980
www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/nvidia_geforcegtx_1070_overclocking
What is the purpose of a GPU backplate? Can it help protect the back of the card from corrosion?
Bench-life just spilled the beans on the notebook versions of Geforce GTX 1080 / GTX 1070.
N17x Family of GPUs:
- No 'M' branding, so they will be called just Geforce GTX 1080 / GTX 1070.
- Notebook Geforce GTX 1080 - 3DMark 11 Performance Score: ~25.000 points
- Notebook Geforce GTX 1070 - 3DMark 11 Performance Score: ~21.000 points
- Debuting in the first week of August.
As a reference, here's numbers for the desktop variants:
https://benchlife.info/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-for-notebook-ready-for-august-06072016
It adds structural support to the GPU (makes it more rigid) to help prevent sag on longer, heavy cards. Also it aids in cooling to the back-side mounted ram chips.
Let's say some kind of liquid (water i.e.) is spilt on the entire card, would the backplate prevent corrosion in that case?
Could you please check the article you listed? I'm getting 404 trying to view your link there.