Nvidia ,Rtx2080ti,2080,2070, information thread. Reviews and prices September 14.

Page 19 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Qwertilot

Golden Member
Nov 28, 2013
1,604
257
126
Yep, They literally have priced the 2080 at the price point of the near peak price people were paying for 1080s during coin mania. I had a nasty feeling this was going to be the longterm end result after people continually bought the cards at such heightened prices. They showed Nvidia there was a market willing to pay such prices and now like any good business, Nvidia's moving in for the kill.

To some extent, some of it is also due to their having totally split off their compute focused designs.

That's led to Titan cards having been assigned to compute only purposes.There'll be a 7nm one at some point relatively soon.

So, this range is effectively Titan, xx80 priced as the top 'realistic' card etc.

If they're not replacing everything in a years time then they'll presumably push it all down a level in an equivalent effect to releasing the xx80ti from the last few generations.
 

Jaydip

Diamond Member
Mar 29, 2010
3,691
21
81
I am glad that we are are finally at least trying to have better IQ in game, that field has almost been forgotten . NV still has to push it though, the developers have become too lazy now a days.
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
5,602
8,793
136
0:30-0:31- shadow improperly rendered as the guy was falling down the cliff, RT would have enabled the guy ahead to see him incoming earlier.
Absolutely not. Not only is it crazy to say that someone's shadow is more noticeable as they run down a hill than, you know, a person running down a hill, but the light source is casting a shadow in the opposite direction than what would be required for the opponent to "see him coming".
0:40-0:41- cresting the hill segment literally everything lighting related rendered wrong, positioning was impossible to determine- can't tell based on the angle of light if it would have benefited the players, maybe.
Not even sure what the argument for RT helping here is so . . .
1:24-1:25 shadow missing when he jumps down giving the player a decided advantage.
Again, shadow isn't missing, at least there's no way of really telling because the light source is in front of the player's view so the shadow would be casting behind him. I don't face the sun and look down at the ground and say my shadow is missing. Also, just as before, if there's someone on a hill above me jumping at me, I don't think my first clue I'm in danger would be a shadow being cast from his body, even if the light source was behind him instead of behind me as in the video.
1:34-1:35 missing muzzle flashes hid his location from oncoming-
Nope. Muzzle flashes exist in the game, you can see plenty examples of it. In this game, you don't see your own muzzle flashes or they are heavily muted for a reason. That doesn't mean other players don't see it though.
I could keep going with this, is it really necessary though?
Nope, as all your arguments for this game are silly as is your example of pinpointing an opponent through a car door (or whatever object) reflection. Even with RT, that will not happen in this game. It's also just not realistic whatsoever. I'd love to hear the story of a soldier taking down an enemy combatant that starts, "So first, I pinpointed his position through the reflection of the door of the car parked on the corner." Just trying to do that in BF5 would get you killed. P.S. The way reflections work, if you can see them, they can see you so it doesn't really benefit you much even if you were able to pull it off.

Look, I'm excited for RT and have been looking forward to it for many years. However, this isn't the RT I have been looking forward to, but it is a nice first step. This is a hybrid approach with a "cut down" version of ray tracing because even with the dedicated hardware, there's still not enough compute power to do proper RT. Add onto that the limited range of cards that support it and the steep price you are asked to pay for it with limited announced game support and the (speculated) small increase in general game performance, it's really hard to get excited for these cards at this time. We also need devs to actually design their games with RT in mind before it will really feel like the revolutionary step forward that it should be, but that's at least a few years off or more.

If Nvidia priced these cards the same as the 10xx line or maybe a tiny bit more expensive, then I think almost everyone would be excited about the potential. But as it is (and considering 7 nm is not far away), I think most people this feels more like a shake down than a graphical leap forward you're willing to pay for.
 

itsmydamnation

Platinum Member
Feb 6, 2011
2,864
3,418
136
I am glad that we are are finally at least trying to have better IQ in game, that field has almost been forgotten . NV still has to push it though, the developers have become too lazy now a days.
not sure if serious..........
 

Zenoth

Diamond Member
Jan 29, 2005
5,196
197
106
The one thing I'm wondering about right now is whether the 1070 and the 1070 Ti will drop in price (from MSRP, if anything?) after the launch of the 2070. If so, and the 1070 Ti ends up still being faster then I'll probably go for that one instead. That, or the bitcoin mining craze still goes on and the 10xx series' prices will remain in orbit for a while.
 

krumme

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 2009
5,956
1,595
136
So you don't think they should offer 4K resolution either, right?
Ofcource. Try playing bf1 at 4k vs1080. Higher res in that type of game not only adds visual quality. It also adds to the experience and gives a compettitive edge. Onlike eg. Higher res textures that mean next to nothing in that regard. Needs to be experienced.

Many of todays games is light years behind gfx vice. A game like pubg with raytracing will be the perfect definition of lipstick on a pig.

It looks good on pictures and marketing. Real gameplay will prove its far less of an advantage vs the cost. Its more soap and glitter vs grit and blood.

What we need is just some real clean dx12 games that dont run on dx11 cards at all. Build on clean dx12 engines.
 
Reactions: beginner99

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,637
3,095
136
You know what? This feels weird. I think Nvidia might release an 1100 series with GTX naming still. Maybe they just wanted to dump a ton of Turing dies onto gamers because they weren't good enough for Quadros? A Pascal refresh still makes sense IMO. The only thing that doesn't make sense in doing this, is it would take people away from embracing the ray tracing tech for a while longer. But, anyone who didn't want to spend the money on an RTX wouldn't have bought one anyway, so might as well sell them a refreshed Pascal 1100 series.

I know, it's a long shot and probably won't happen, but he did emphasize "The RTX family" quite a lot, which indicates to me that GTX isn't going anywhere just yet, and GTX is due for a refresh. I feel there is about a 60% chance of this happening.

Nvidia knows there are LEGIONS of disappointed gamers who can't spend this much, or refuse to. If they announce an 1100 series refresh at far less prices, there will be a slingshot effect in these people I believe, where they feel relief and buy the 1100 series card.

I'm trying to be positive and assume that Nvidia wouldn't just kick their customers in the teeth and walk away like this. I wouldn't blame them for pretending like the RTX series is all there is, because people will spend the big money on these. If they knew a faster Pascal was waiting in the wings, many might hold out and not spend so much on RTX.
 
Reactions: Ottonomous

mohit9206

Golden Member
Jul 2, 2013
1,381
511
136
I don't get why so many people here are upset about the pricing. Yes it sucks, but nobody is forcing anyone to buy these cards. People who own 1070 and above don't even need to upgrade anytime soon. People with older cards can just get a used 980ti or 1070/1080/1080ti now that the prices have come down. If you believe that the new products are too expensive then vote with your wallet. Read a lot of posts in here that are angry with Nvidia regarding the new cards but ordered one anyway "because they had to". I get some enthusiasts have an addiction for upgrading every year by selling their older cards but this time around even that doesn't seem to be a good idea as price difference is huge between used last gen cards and new current gen ones.
 
Reactions: Ottonomous

Ottonomous

Senior member
May 15, 2014
559
292
136
You know what? This feels weird. I think Nvidia might release an 1100 series with GTX naming still. Maybe they just wanted to dump a ton of Turing dies onto gamers because they weren't good enough for Quadros? A Pascal refresh still makes sense IMO. The only thing that doesn't make sense in doing this, is it would take people away from embracing the ray tracing tech for a while longer. But, anyone who didn't want to spend the money on an RTX wouldn't have bought one anyway, so might as well sell them a refreshed Pascal 1100 series.

I know, it's a long shot and probably won't happen, but he did emphasize "The RTX family" quite a lot, which indicates to me that GTX isn't going anywhere just yet, and GTX is due for a refresh. I feel there is about a 60% chance of this happening.

Nvidia knows there are LEGIONS of disappointed gamers who can't spend this much, or refuse to. If they announce an 1100 series refresh at far less prices, there will be a slingshot effect in these people I believe, where they feel relief and buy the 1100 series card.

I'm trying to be positive and assume that Nvidia wouldn't just kick their customers in the teeth and walk away like this. I wouldn't blame them for pretending like the RTX series is all there is, because people will spend the big money on these. If they knew a faster Pascal was waiting in the wings, many might hold out and not spend so much on RTX.
I hope so too but the issue of pricing might reemerge. They won't cannabalize the RTX trio but won't provide value in performance a few dollars away. Price it close enough perf-wise after AIB RTX boards dip a bit and everyone will just say 'eff it' and go for the RTX.

Could also become an Apple Iphone 6 alongside 8 scenario where they won't scale down 1080ti/1080 for us and force us towards the RTX 2070 (if it is similar or exceeds the Ti)
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
I don't get why so many people here are upset about the pricing. Yes it sucks, but nobody is forcing anyone to buy these cards. People who own 1070 and above don't even need to upgrade anytime soon. People with older cards can just get a used 980ti or 1070/1080/1080ti now that the prices have come down. If you believe that the new products are too expensive then vote with your wallet. Read a lot of posts in here that are angry with Nvidia regarding the new cards but ordered one anyway "because they had to". I get some enthusiasts have an addiction for upgrading every year by selling their older cards but this time around even that doesn't seem to be a good idea as price difference is huge between used last gen cards and new current gen ones.

I think most people are more "disappointed" than "upset."

Just like with intel before Ryzen, nvidia has gotten lazy and decided to offer less of an increase and charge more because they are the only high-end game in town. We only got 6-core mainstream CPUs thanks to AMD, but AMD is lacking in the GPU space for now so no one is pushing nvidia to compete.

Just like with intel where I kept my i5-2500 for many years because the newer CPUs offered such a small increase, I'll probably hold on to my 980 ti for another year, unless these GPUs are much faster than they look like on paper.

So yes, I'll be voting with my wallet.
 

AtenRa

Lifer
Feb 2, 2009
14,003
3,361
136
Do we not want higher performance to enable better visuals? Is that not the reason for it? I'm just trying to establish baselines of what discussion I'm having

Yes we are definitely want more performance to enable better visuals. But and here is the big BUT, we always had more performance after two years at the previous price. Now each time, they are asking more.
We had top single GPU cards at 500-600 USD, now we reached 1000-1200 USD. Next year a 3080Ti at 7nm could also be 1300-1500 USD, after all it will have more performance than todays 2080Ti.

And the next problem is, IF AMD would be able to launch a 2080Ti Competitor card in November, they would not ask 500-600 USD but even at 800-900 USD it would be seen as VFM against the 1000-1200 USD 2080Ti.
 
Reactions: crisium

Hans Gruber

Platinum Member
Dec 23, 2006
2,220
1,154
136
I got my GTX 970 with two free games for $270-280 after a $20 rebate a few years ago. They used to start the prices higher and lower them over time. Now they keep the prices at the inflated MSRP throughout the production cycle until the next product release version.
 

Newbian

Lifer
Aug 24, 2008
24,781
845
126
I got my GTX 970 with two free games for $270-280 after a $20 rebate a few years ago. They used to start the prices higher and lower them over time. Now they keep the prices at the inflated MSRP throughout the production cycle until the next product release version.
Unfortunately if the marketplace allows it and the lack of competition allows it plus silly things like the mining craze happens then welcome to keeping nvidia's stock happy.
 
Reactions: mohit9206

JasonLD

Senior member
Aug 22, 2017
486
447
136
You know what? This feels weird. I think Nvidia might release an 1100 series with GTX naming still. Maybe they just wanted to dump a ton of Turing dies onto gamers because they weren't good enough for Quadros? A Pascal refresh still makes sense IMO. The only thing that doesn't make sense in doing this, is it would take people away from embracing the ray tracing tech for a while longer. But, anyone who didn't want to spend the money on an RTX wouldn't have bought one anyway, so might as well sell them a refreshed Pascal 1100 series.

I know, it's a long shot and probably won't happen, but he did emphasize "The RTX family" quite a lot, which indicates to me that GTX isn't going anywhere just yet, and GTX is due for a refresh. I feel there is about a 60% chance of this happening.

Nvidia knows there are LEGIONS of disappointed gamers who can't spend this much, or refuse to. If they announce an 1100 series refresh at far less prices, there will be a slingshot effect in these people I believe, where they feel relief and buy the 1100 series card.

I'm trying to be positive and assume that Nvidia wouldn't just kick their customers in the teeth and walk away like this. I wouldn't blame them for pretending like the RTX series is all there is, because people will spend the big money on these. If they knew a faster Pascal was waiting in the wings, many might hold out and not spend so much on RTX.

Not happening. 7nm is not that far away and that is probably when they will push RTX into more mainstream. Expect GTX to be phased out in next couple of years.
 

mohit9206

Golden Member
Jul 2, 2013
1,381
511
136
Smart people will skip this gen and wait for 7nm but i already see lots of people pre ordering these new RTX cards! That too with no benchmarks out. Nvidia is truly amazing. Their marketing power is incredible.
 

Tup3x

Golden Member
Dec 31, 2016
1,011
1,002
136
Not happening. 7nm is not that far away and that is probably when they will push RTX into more mainstream. Expect GTX to be phased out in next couple of years.
Yeah, also the ray tracing is the future now that it is finally starting to become viable. Next iteration will just strengthen that even further.
 

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
2,980
126
1200 bucks for slightly better shadows and reflections? And still no benchmarks in actual games? Yeah, no thanks.

And I wouldn’t be surprised if the non-RTX Tomb Raider scenes were dumbed down for comparison purposes. Crysis 2 over-tessellated concrete barriers and all that.

Unless the thing has monstrous performance over Pascal in current games, I’ll definitely be skipping this overpriced turd.
 
Last edited:

Timorous

Golden Member
Oct 27, 2008
1,727
3,152
136
These are looking overpriced. Not sure how much perf/shader they can squeeze out but comparing the spec change from the 980Ti to the 1070 vs the 1080Ti to the 2070 is quite stark.

The 1070 had 24% less bandwidth than the 980ti but had an increase of 6.5% TFlops and an overall performance increase vs the 980Ti of around 11%.
The 2070FE loses 7% bandwidth vs the 1080Ti and also loses 33% TFlops compared to the 1080Ti.

Going back the 660Ti was faster than the 580, the 770 was faster than the 680, the 970 was similar to the 780Ti and the 1070 was faster than the 980Ti. You have to go back to the 560Ti to find a generation where the new 3rd tier card was not faster than the old top tier card (if you exclude the dual GPU monsters). This could be the smallest performance bump since the 5xx over the 4xx series and that was just a respin of the same architecture, it also did not bump each tier up a price bracket (Ti to Titan, x80 to Ti, x70 to x80).
 
Reactions: crisium

Borealis7

Platinum Member
Oct 19, 2006
2,914
205
106
no one said it, so i'm gonna: Ray-Tracing is the new Tesselation!
and about all the shadows in the keynote demos...first thing i do when i start a new game is to tone down the shadows to a minimum, i prefer more FPS.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
Let's be clear, the competition isn't AMD right now. It's the Nvidia 1000 series. A 2070's shader specs are worse than a 1080's! The only thing that appears to save it, based on what we can see now, is the GDDR6 bandwidth. I'd estimate a 2070 will be about the same performance as a 1080 in games. Worse in mining and distributed computing.

There is one wild card, though, and that's the claim that the 2000 series will be able to do integer and floating point math simultaneously. This sounds a lot like hyper-threading. Gains from that are hard to predict; if it works like they claim, on games I'd roughly guess a 10-50% improvement, but I don't know how games use the shader hardware. On mining and DC, gains from that will be either 0% or something up to ~70%; probably somewhere in between and very dependent on the application. And if it doesn't work like they claim gains will be just 0%.
I have to think that if the cards were much faster sans the RTX stuff, we'd have seen a demo of that.

I can't think of a reason not to show us that the cards are faster in general than Pascal.

Why talk about the all new SM features and cache, but not demonstrate that it works better?
 

Chicken76

Senior member
Jun 10, 2013
261
41
91
So in June Huang said no new GPUs 'for along time'. Two months later they launch a new generation, with multiple dies ready right from the start. Isn't that illegal?
 
Reactions: psolord

Guru

Senior member
May 5, 2017
830
361
106
Says the guy who was telling us he was certain we were not getting RTX cards but plain old GTX cards:


I don't think your guesswork is worth much. RTX HW is what NVidia is delivering, and they have been working with devs behind the scenes to get support into major game engines, and to get updates for already shipping games.

Yeah, this is just a stopgap with the same architecture and GDDR6 added on, bigger die to increase the cores and add the ray tracing cores. Its essentially a one off, naming scheme for 7nm graphic cards are still GTX. What Nvidia is delivering here is a stopgap to 7nm. AMD has advantage and priority on 7nm, so Nvidia are essentially reshashing their old products, adding a specified RTX core for ray tracing and calling it new.

Nvidia know AMD will be first to market with 7nm, so rather than react to them and release second, they are releasing new GPU's now to maximize profits to cover for the slight downtime on going second for 7nm.
 

LTC8K6

Lifer
Mar 10, 2004
28,520
1,575
126
Yeah, this is just a stopgap with the same architecture and GDDR6 added on, bigger die to increase the cores and add the ray tracing cores. Its essentially a one off, naming scheme for 7nm graphic cards are still GTX. What Nvidia is delivering here is a stopgap to 7nm. AMD has advantage and priority on 7nm, so Nvidia are essentially reshashing their old products, adding a specified RTX core for ray tracing and calling it new.

Nvidia know AMD will be first to market with 7nm, so rather than react to them and release second, they are releasing new GPU's now to maximize profits to cover for the slight downtime on going second for 7nm.
I don't see how Turing can be a re-hash if the SM is all new?
But again, we saw no real demo of that new SM.
 

maddogmcgee

Senior member
Apr 20, 2015
385
310
136
? Going from KB/M to potato controller and you would make the switch in an instant? I dont know how all these peasants can aim with those freaking analog sticks

Ok. So maybe as a non-FPS gamer I do not appreciate the advantages of a mouse in shooters. I retract my statement. HOWEVER, I did get into RTS on the nintendo 64. If you think you have it bad with shooters and a potato controller, try playing Starcraft Brood War!
 
Reactions: n0x1ous
Status
Not open for further replies.
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |