Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: schtuga
Well now,we've had over 60 pages of the same statements ,by the same people over and over.
1) Some people simply don't give a sh*t about this marketing,it's a part of life and how ALL companies will start/try to do business(whether we like it or not)
2)Some people feel strongly against this type of marketing and have stated it over and over and over and over and ,...well you know(not saying I am for it,but I am also against income tax and I'm sure whining about it isn't going to change that either)
3) And some people have taken advantage of the situation and their obvious PERSONAL feelings against Rollo to use this situation to post the same name calling over and over,but do it in the battle against viral marketring,to justify it.
The people in #3 are doing the most damage against the cause,because their statements are more reflected specifically to Rollo and not the program.AT is gonna see that it is more personal to those people.If you simply would have stated your opinion against the marketing,then Rollo being invovled would have been included in the decision regardless .
But it's easy to see the people using the marketing as an excuse and it weakens the voice against the marketing.
Appopin made a good statement that it would be welcome if it was transparent.And we knew who these people are.So if all the members reveal it and openly state it ,would that be enough.Or has it simply become that personal that people feel Rollo should go regardless?
One last question--Does anybody here feel ousting Rollo will put an end to viral marketing in forums forever and ever.Can anyone guarantee there isn't another tech company using this method on AT forums as we type?
And before I get called a rollo clone/worshipper etc,the reason I am asking is because everyone has stated their hatred for the marketing/Rollo,but does ousting Rollo solve the marketing.No one is discussing how we can remedy the situation as a whole,no intelligent conversation on how we could lets say vote a 3 person committee to police the vid forum,or how we would like to discuss these things with the companies invovled,what can we change to make it acceptable.We oust Rollo ,they send someone else and the witch hunt continues,nothing solved.Let's try to be intelligent responsible people here instead of he called me names,yeah but you did first.
FIRST OF ALL, let me publically apologize to you for calling you a 'rollo clone worshipper'.
Sorry
and you do make very valid points
there are several acceptable POVs . . . i realize that there are those who really don't care about Viral marketing. i only take issue with those who defend it . . . it fails to meet the Word of Mouth Marketing Assn Draft Code of Ethics.
stating myy POV over-and-over is in RESPONSE to [the same] people attacking it over-and-over - note i am being called out by name.
i really don't care about "Rollo" . . . but i recognize there is a
person behind the avatar who is a fellow human with feelings just like me . . . and i imagine he is more than hurt now.
i don't hate the person . . . just dislike his stealth abusive trolling tactics
No ousting Rollo will not "change" the way Viral marketing works . . . but the discussion has called for more ethics in TRANSPARANCY of WoM programs. Hopefully companies will get a clue that we don't like this covert manipulation.
and we really NEED moderation . . . but that is a separate issue.