We should get some OCed results for games with cards arriving this week. I would expect the Titan V running at 1455MHz boost clocks to be not much faster than a 1080ti running at 2050MHz. With the Titan V liquid cooled it should be beating an overclocked 1080ti by 40%-50%, maybe even more.
Also the Titan V broke 10,000 on Superposition
What is interesting is if one looks at the detailed results and looks at the clocks:
I am not sure how Superposition record GPU clocks, but it looks to me that the Titan V's boost is capping out around 1844 MHz and averaging around 1820 MHz. Maybe it can spike up to 2010 MHz and that is why it records the max as 2010 MHz.
Compare this to the other high ranking results which remain at their max clock throughout the benchmark. (3rd Place Titan XP for example):
Even assuming the max clock as the average clock for the Titan V it still beats the XP by 1.44x clock for clock. Using an average clock of 1820 MHz it is beating it by 1.6x clock for clock. FP32 core count is only 1.33x higher on the Titan V vs Titan XP, so it looks to have a 10%-20% uplift from uarch (memory bandwidth looks to be nearly the same per FP32 core on these results).
Numbers for the Titan V vs 1080ti looks to be 1.55x clock for clock assuming 2010 MHz average for Titan V, 1.72x assuming 1820 MHz average. (As expected 1.55/1.44 = 1.72/1.6 = 3840/3584, Titan XP scales from the 1080ti with the FP32 core count).