nVidia wins this round - Charlie D.

Page 11 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
I can respect your stance on prices. Really, I can -- I don't like paying high prices either. However, Respectfully it seems you're applying a double standard, because NV has pretty much done the same thing in the past on parts that weren't great performance leaps forward. GTX 480 was roughly 10-20% faster, but commanded a huge premium IIRC.

You never did see me vocally and strongly support premium pricing for nVidia.

Personally embraced the sweet spot because not only did it bring value for AMD but for nVidia gamers as well.

I understand premium priced products and don't dismiss them either because some desire the very best and don't mind paying premiums for them. No one is forcing anyone to pay and if a premium priced product brings enjoyment to a gamer -- very happy for them and still welcomed choices from AMD or nVidia.
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
Exactly, I don't recall him ever posting about Go Premiums when green team was charging >30% more for a 15% faster card.

So much for his stance on being consistent. Wait for the rebuttal: "I didn't agree with the premium, I just wasn't vocal about it."

Go Premiums!

Never in my posting have I witnessed such strong, vocal support for premium pricing before.
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
You never did see me vocally and strongly support premium pricing for nVidia.

Personally embraced the sweet spot because not only did it bring value for AMD but for nVidia gamers as well.

I understand premium priced products and don't dismiss them either because some desire the very best and don't mind paying premiums for them. No one is forcing anyone to pay and if a premium priced product brings enjoyment to a gamer -- very happy for them and still welcomed choices from AMD or nVidia.

Well jeez, I pretty much agree with you. Both AMD and NV are charging too much for their high end GPU's.

I miss the days of getting high end GPU's in the 300-400$ range. I remember buying a voodoo 2 for 299$ at a best buy, the good ole days. And the V2 literally slaughtered any game you could throw at it
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
Never in my posting have I witnessed such strong, vocal support for premium pricing before.

I must be a shill

And funny, I don't see this premium you speak off. Guess since I've been buying >$450 worth of GPUs the last decade or so at every upgrade point - it's just the norm for me.

But, oh noes, my example is different than yours D:

Go Premiums!
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
I must be a shill

And funny, I don't see this premium you speak off. Guess since I've been buying >$450 worth of GPUs the last decade or so at every upgrade point - it's just the norm for me.

But, oh noes, my example is different than yours D:

Go Premiums!

As long as you're happy and pleased by your purchase -- great, have fun and enjoy.
 

AnandThenMan

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2004
3,949
504
126
We shall see what AMD redefined when Kepler is out.
So we must hold AMD to a future Nvidia product, can't say anything about redefining price points to products that are actually in the market place, right? That's cool, when Kepler hits, let's just see how well Nvidia redefines anything when it goes up against the 8000 series.
nVidia has over a 60 percent desktop discrete advantage, according to Mercury Research -- do you believe premium pricing is going to help AMD?
Ah yes playing the market share card. So you believe you are better at defining price points than AMD.
You never did see me vocally and strongly support premium pricing for nVidia.
Did you speak out against it dozens of times back then, like you are now in regards to AMD?
I understand premium priced products and don't dismiss them either because some desire the very best and don't mind paying premiums for them. No one is forcing anyone to pay and if a premium priced product brings enjoyment to a gamer -- very happy for them and still welcomed choices from AMD or nVidia.
What does this even mean? This to me is worse than marketing speak, buzz words tossed together with no substance.
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
So we must hold AMD to a future Nvidia product, can't say anything about redefining price points to products that are actually in the market place, right? That's cool, when Kepler hits, let's just see how well Nvidia redefines anything when it goes up against the 8000 series.

If ya want. But, for me 28nm vs 28nm is fine.

Ah yes playing the market share card.

I think pricing and market share are relevant.

Did you speak out against it dozens of times back then, like you are now in regards to AMD?

No, I haven't -- never had to. Never in my posting have I seen such strong, vocal support for premium pricing before.

Broken record mode: It's like the sweet spot never existed.
 

AnandThenMan

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2004
3,949
504
126
If ya want. But, for me 28nm vs 28nm is fine.
Then you are outright admitting bias. It's not AMD's fault that Nvidia doesn't have any 28nm products. I don't ever once recall people saying, wait until AMD has an equivalent node CPU before we do performance/price comparisons, do you? If fact that would be downright stupid.
 

GaiaHunter

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2008
3,634
180
106
Is the 7970 a bad card?

Is the 7970 an expensive card?

Is the 7970 price justified in the current market?

My own answers are:

No, yes, yes.

What about yours SirPauly?
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
Then you are outright admitting bias. It's not AMD's fault that Nvidia doesn't have any 28nm products. I don't ever once recall people saying, wait until AMD has an equivalent node CPU before we do performance/price comparisons, do you? If fact that would be downright stupid.

I think it is wise to see how both players offer their new/arch/node before I blanket either. Right now, AMD is the only player in town, great for them and great for early adopters that demand the very best right now.
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
Is the 7970 a bad card?

Is the 7970 an expensive card?

Is the 7970 price justified in the current market?

My own answers are:

No, yes, yes.

What about yours SirPauly?

No, it is a welcomed choice and based on the OC's and scaling -- bodes well for the architecture for future sku's. The added tessellation and GPU compute abilities are very welcomed; as is the super-sampled for DirectX 10 and 11.

Yes and no. Yes, based on it is premium priced but feel since 28nm was substantial and significant, feel the performance is not. No, because of AMD's engineering and execution prowess, the product can be compared to 40nm price/performance and in this context there is tangible value.

Yes based on what is available. However, with notation that AMD has softened on their commitment to their sweet spot strategy and nothing has been really redefined, hence current 40nm product pricing are basically status quo.
 

AnandThenMan

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2004
3,949
504
126
I think it is wise to see how both players offer their new/arch/node before I blanket either.
The one making blanket statements is you, declaring that the "sweet spot" is dead based on ONE high end SKU that has been out for a few weeks.
 

paul878

Senior member
Jul 31, 2010
874
1
0
By the time Nvidia get into the ring the fight is over!
What the hell is this guy talking about?
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
The one making blanket statements is you, declaring that the "sweet spot" is dead based on ONE high end SKU that has been out for a few weeks.

The word I like to use is "soften" their stance/commitment and clearly they did.
 

AnandThenMan

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2004
3,949
504
126
The word I like to use is "soften" their stance/commitment and clearly they did.
They are adapting and responding to market conditions. The only commitment is to making money, not holding themselves to an ideal, which you obviously thiink is much more important than being profitable.

BTW, from a consumer perspective I hated when Nvidia was milking the market to the tune of $800+ on a video card. But from a business perspective, I understand it and if I was setting the price points, I would have done the same thing.
 

GaiaHunter

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2008
3,634
180
106
No, it is a welcomed choice and based on the OC's and scaling -- bodes well for the architecture for future sku's. The added tessellation and GPU compute abilities are very welcomed; as is the super-sampled for DirectX 10 and 11.

Yes and no. Yes, based on it is premium priced but feel since 28nm was substantial and significant, feel the performance is not. No, because of AMD's engineering and execution prowess, the product can be compared to 40nm price/performance and in this context there is tangible value.

Yes based on what is available. However, with notation that AMD has softened on their commitment to their sweet spot strategy and nothing has been really redefined, hence current 40nm product pricing are basically status quo.

A company prefers to sell 1 million of cards making $100 profit each than selling a few thousand making $400 profit each.

Obviously in this case demand outstrip supply, so, in my opinion, judging anything based on the current price of a low volume item isn't productive.

You keep talking about it being 28nm so price/performance should be phenomenal, forgetting that same phenomenal 28nm process is probably not producing volume.

And that is how you lower prices of items - volume.

Or do you have doubts the super duper 28nm process isn't on the same level of 40nm and 55nm in regards to yields and/or volume?
 

IonusX

Senior member
Dec 25, 2011
392
0
0
i dont get why nvidia fans are screaming for kepler. tesla wont be for 2 years if not more giving amd plenty of time to surpass it and reign supreme. 2013 the year without nvidia..

you make justin beiber look good..
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
You keep talking about it being 28nm so price/performance should be phenomenal, forgetting that same phenomenal 28nm process is probably not producing volume.

What I did expect is 28nm to redefine 40nm price performance but up to this point it really hasn't, imho. But, it's still early with many product sku's from AMD and nVidia to come.
 

LOL_Wut_Axel

Diamond Member
Mar 26, 2011
4,310
8
81
What I did expect is 28nm to redefine 40nm price performance but up to this point it really hasn't, imho. But, it's still early with many product sku's from AMD and nVidia to come.

Yeah, but you can currently get something like a Radeon HD 6870 for only $160. That's some pretty serious bang-for-buck. The reason why I bought my GTX 460 SSC+ 6 months ago, which performs the same or just a tiny bit faster since it comes with a hefty 850MHz Core clock, is that it costed $160 and I run Folding@home. The HD 6870 is definitely the best card you can buy right now when it comes to bang-for-buck. Given the recent $30-40 price difference between the 6950 1GB and 560 Ti 1GB I'm more inclined to recommend the Ti since it's only 5-10% slower and it OCs good, and it's not half bad when it comes to efficiency.
 
Sep 19, 2009
85
0
0
Charlie said, on his forum, that:
-GK110 is actually two GK104;
-Kepler's memory controller is better, but still not by much

I think we can conclude that, if what Charlie said was right, then it GK104 is going to be between a HD 6950 and the GTX 580, most probably around GTX 570/HD 6970 and that nVidia finally turned into a "small die" strategy.

Also, if nVidia wins in perf/mm², I would guess the die size is going to be about 250mm².
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
Charlie said, on his forum, that:
-GK110 is actually two GK104;
-Kepler's memory controller is better, but still not by much

I think we can conclude that, if what Charlie said was right, then it GK104 is going to be between a HD 6950 and the GTX 580, most probably around GTX 570/HD 6970 and that nVidia finally turned into a "small die" strategy.

Also, if nVidia wins in perf/mm², I would guess the die size is going to be about 250mm².

You say this without a link to the URL. I HATE YOU! Just kidding. Now to find this forum

AND WTH? Small die strategy? Did the world just turn flat or something, I did not expect NV to do a 180 in their strategy.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |