nVidia wins this round - Charlie D.

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
lol as many people predicted *cough*

Well most thought around $300 or so, we'll see what happens should be funny either way.
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,939
6
81
Take into consideration these are watered down results including 1024 x 768, and the lack of enhancements. Using these makes them all much closer than they really are.

Depends on what you are trying to achieve and how you want to represent performance, which is yet another reason why comparing two things is difficult.
You can make a leap in certain performance situations (e.g. when using AA) which doesn't apply to all situations.

When comparing AMD to NV, AMD is shown in a better light at the highest resolutions (2560x1600), while NV is better at lower resolutions (in relative terms. The gap narrows as the resolution increases for the last few generations).

So showing overall averaged performance is both more accurate, and less accurate, depending on what element of performance you are trying to show as improving.
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
7950 doesn't "cost" $450, that's just what they plan to sell it for.

Just like the 7970 doesn't "cost" $550 thus arguing it's a "$550 card" isn't the right way to go about it since the market decides the price and currently it is the top card which means AMD is basing pricing off the current market not whatever the future may hold.

Let's hope that's what Nvidia does, because if the "$450" card is slower than this than we're looking at mid ranged cards costing $450+ with high end cards eclipsing $600.
 
Sep 19, 2009
85
0
0
So Charlie is saying a $300 card is going to beat a $450 (7950) one? The day nvidia plays the cost card to undercut AMD is the day we get rides on unicorns that crap skittles.

He never said it would beat it.

And then, of course, that very same thing happened with RV770.
 
Last edited:

blastingcap

Diamond Member
Sep 16, 2010
6,654
5
76
So Charlie is saying a $300 card is going to beat a $450 (7950) one? The day nvidia plays the cost card to undercut AMD is the day we get rides on unicorns that crap skittles.

I agree, though NVDA is also probably pissed at losing so much market share, so this could be their way of striking back. (Also, NVDA can afford to subsidize gamers by selling the same chips with DP enabled for HPC and professional graphics customers.) But then again, I am in the camp that believes that GK104 is NOT at Tahiti-like performance levels when comparing overclocked vs. overclocked or stock vs. stock.

I think Charlie calling GK104 a winner, is based more on financials than on price/perf to the end consumer. Apparently GK104 is a relatively small chip that nevertheless probably overclocks to the level of a stock Tahiti or so. If you overclock the Tahiti chip, though, obviously it will be faster again. If that's the case, the GK104 = RV770 comparison might be made.

Also note that GK104 has 1GB less of the highest-end GDDR5 than Tahiti, so it will be cheaper for that reason, as well as having a smaller chip, and probably also a lower TDP and thus requires less robust PCB and components like voltage regulation, fan, vapor chamber, etc.
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
I don't see why we're speculating on overclocks already, eh.

However if Nvidia is releasing poor clocking cards like AMD did with the 5 and 6 series than I'll be passing. Overclocking makes me feel better about spending so much in the first place, free performance boosts eases the pain.
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
7950 doesn't "cost" $450, that's just what they plan to sell it for.

Just like the 7970 doesn't "cost" $550 thus arguing it's a "$550 card" isn't the right way to go about it since the market decides the price and currently it is the top card which means AMD is basing pricing off the current market not whatever the future may hold.

Let's hope that's what Nvidia does, because if the "$450" card is slower than this than we're looking at mid ranged cards costing $450+ with high end cards eclipsing $600.

Let's say nVidia prices at 299 and has competitive performance to a 550 dollar price range -- there may be backlash for AMD and their partners; and their consumers may not be happy and may have to offer rebates and drastic price reductions.

It could be the polar opposite of what happened with the GTX-280 and HD 4870.
 

Vesku

Diamond Member
Aug 25, 2005
3,743
28
86
I would be very happy if NVIDIA launched 28nm mirroring the Radeon 4870 launch. I'll be looking for a new primary card this summer.
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,108
1,260
126
Loving it.

Nvidia fanboys taking Charlie/SA rumours as gospel. In for some shellshock when the reality of what ends up launching at different price points comes to fruition.
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
Let's say nVidia prices at 299 and has competitive performance to a 550 dollar price range -- there may be backlash for AMD and their partners; and their consumers may not be happy and may have to offer rebates and drastic price reductions.

It could be the polar opposite of what happened with the GTX-280 and HD 4870.

If AMD plays it classy ala nVidia during the 8800 ultra days, I'm fine with that. I win as a consumer!

However, I'd hope the price cuts come BEFORE the MSI Lightining launches that way I don't have to wait for no stinking rebates

HD 7970 @ $350 with monster OC capabilities, yes please!

Go Premiums!
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,108
1,260
126
If AMD plays it classy ala nVidia during the 8800 ultra days, I'm fine with that. I win as a consumer!

However, I'd hope the price cuts come BEFORE the MSI Lightining launches that way I don't have to wait for no stinking rebates

HD 7970 @ $350 with monster OC capabilities, yes please!

Go Premiums!

People's memories are hazy. It wasn't nvidia who offered the rebates, it was AIBs, and not all of them. As I recall EVGA, BFG and XFX were offering them, if you had bought a 280 from a different vendor - you got shafted.

Edit: Go Premiums! Significant! Substantial! Node Change! Price! Performance! Goooo Premiums!
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
People's memories are hazy. It wasn't nvidia who offered the rebates, it was AIBs, and not all of them. As I recall EVGA, BFG and XFX were offering them, if you had bought a 280 from a different vendor - you got shafted.

Edit: Go Premiums! Significant! Substantial! Node Change! Price! Performance! Goooo Premiums!

I personally don't care who offers it, as long as in the end I get money back haha.

Just like the retailers did for when Toshiba called it quits on HD DVD. Do your customers right, and they'll do you right!
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
Did mention partners!

Hehe, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery! Thanks!
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
Loving it.

Nvidia fanboys taking Charlie/SA rumours as gospel. In for some shellshock when the reality of what ends up launching at different price points comes to fruition.

It can't be worse than the MSRP percentage raise from AMD -- then again with all this vocal premium love it could be possible.
 

ShadowOfMyself

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2006
4,230
2
0
LOL, people actually think Nvidia would release a 299$ card that can match the 7970? How can you fanboy over a company and not even know how they work?

This is the same company that released the 649$ GTX 280 only to drop it 200$ in price 2 weeks later... Nvidia will do anything to get the highest possible price-point, they would never make a move like that, either the card has average performance which justifies the 299$, or it will be priced at 500$ instead
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
LOL, people actually think Nvidia would release a 299$ card that can match the 7970? How can you fanboy over a company and not even know how they work?

This is the same company that released the 649$ GTX 280 only to drop it 200$ in price 2 weeks later... Nvidia will do anything to get the highest possible price-point, they would never make a move like that, either the card has average performance which justifies the 299$, or it will be priced at 500$ instead

Well if that happens then maybe for once this forum will all agree...

Go Premiums!
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,108
1,260
126
It can't be worse than the MSRP percentage raise from AMD -- then again with all this vocal premium love it could be possible.

My guess is you simply are not used to being a purchaser of high end GPUs or have little context for the history of video card pricing.

I can remember paying between $500 and $750 for the top end card for years now. 9800Pro, X1900XT, X800XT-PE, 8800GTX, GTX480 and soon - 7970. You seem to have personalized the whole pricing of these cards too much. It's as if you feel a company is your friend and made a commitment to you because they sold you some hardware at a good price that one time... wait.. you didn't buy a 5870 or 5850.. hmmm...

Well, back on track, these are businesses and they know what they're doing better than even the smallest marginal clue you have about what they are doing. Sold out 7970s, as predicted - proved you wrong with the thousands and thousands of buyers out there who have snapped up all the 7970s and are enjoying the new level of performance brought by them.

Premiums! Significant! Performance! Node change!
 
Last edited:

Arzachel

Senior member
Apr 7, 2011
903
76
91
I agree, though NVDA is also probably pissed at losing so much market share, so this could be their way of striking back. (Also, NVDA can afford to subsidize gamers by selling the same chips with DP enabled for HPC and professional graphics customers.) But then again, I am in the camp that believes that GK104 is NOT at Tahiti-like performance levels when comparing overclocked vs. overclocked or stock vs. stock.

I think Charlie calling GK104 a winner, is based more on financials than on price/perf to the end consumer. Apparently GK104 is a relatively small chip that nevertheless probably overclocks to the level of a stock Tahiti or so. If you overclock the Tahiti chip, though, obviously it will be faster again. If that's the case, the GK104 = RV770 comparison might be made.

Also note that GK104 has 1GB less of the highest-end GDDR5 than Tahiti, so it will be cheaper for that reason, as well as having a smaller chip, and probably also a lower TDP and thus requires less robust PCB and components like voltage regulation, fan, vapor chamber, etc.

Yeah, this seems to ring true.

Nvidia releasing a card that's cheap to make and near the performance of the HD 7950 for a lot less sounds like it could be right. Kinda reminiscent of how aggresive they where with the GTX 460.
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
My guess is you simply are not used to being a purchaser of high end GPUs or have little context for the history of video card pricing.

I can remember paying between $500 and $750 for the top end card for years now. 9800Pro, X1900XT, X800XT-PE, 8800GTX, GTX480 and soon - 7970. You seem to have personalized the whole pricing of these cards too much. It's as if you feel a company is your friend and made a commitment to you because they sold you some hardware at a good price that one time... wait.. you didn't buy a 5870 or 5850.. hmmm...

Well, back on track, these are businesses and they know what they're doing better than even the smallest marginal clue you have about what they are doing. Sold out 7970s, as predicted - proved you wrong.

Premiums! Significant! Performance! Node change!

You mean 9800 XT!!! $500 if I remember right. . The only time I bought a card under $300 (HD 4850) I quickly regretted it and picked up a 4870 X2 when they launched. It was that or a second 4850, but I wanted to try a dual GPU single card solution (never going to do that again haha, not because of the 4870x2, just when it comes to sell it is a pain.)
 

boxleitnerb

Platinum Member
Nov 1, 2011
2,601
2
81
LOL, people actually think Nvidia would release a 299$ card that can match the 7970? How can you fanboy over a company and not even know how they work?

This is the same company that released the 649$ GTX 280 only to drop it 200$ in price 2 weeks later... Nvidia will do anything to get the highest possible price-point, they would never make a move like that, either the card has average performance which justifies the 299$, or it will be priced at 500$ instead

Look at the parallels in history:
3870 was 25-30% faster than the fastest card of the last generation (X1950XTX). 8800GT was roughly the same performance and priced around 250-300$. There was still a place for the 8800GTX and Ultra in the 500-700$ range. They have made great value cards before that still blew the previous generation away.
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
LOL, people actually think Nvidia would release a 299$ card that can match the 7970? How can you fanboy over a company and not even know how they work?

This is the same company that released the 649$ GTX 280 only to drop it 200$ in price 2 weeks later... Nvidia will do anything to get the highest possible price-point, they would never make a move like that, either the card has average performance which justifies the 299$, or it will be priced at 500$ instead

Then how is nVidia going to get all those mid-range/ performance prospective customers to buy? Using AMD's strategy of pricing according to 40nm performance/value status quo pricing?
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,108
1,260
126
You mean 9800 XT!!! $500 if I remember right. . The only time I bought a card under $300 (HD 4850) I quickly regretted it and picked up a 4870 X2 when they launched. It was that or a second 4850, but I wanted to try a dual GPU single card solution (never going to do that again haha, not because of the 4870x2, just when it comes to sell it is a pain.)

Yeah I forgot to throw in 6800GT there as well. That wasn't even an ultra and I think it cost me $550 at the time.
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
My guess is you simply are not used to being a purchaser of high end GPUs or have little context for the history of video card pricing.

I can remember paying between $500 and $750 for the top end card for years now. 9800Pro, X1900XT, X800XT-PE, 8800GTX, GTX480 and soon - 7970. You seem to have personalized the whole pricing of these cards too much. It's as if you feel a company is your friend and made a commitment to you because they sold you some hardware at a good price that one time... wait.. you didn't buy a 5870 or 5850.. hmmm...

Well, back on track, these are businesses and they know what they're doing better than even the smallest marginal clue you have about what they are doing. Sold out 7970s, as predicted - proved you wrong with the thousands and thousands of buyers out there who have snapped up all the 7970s and are enjoying the new level of performance brought by them.

Premiums! Significant! Performance! Node change!

Have personalized nothing.

I also had the Radeon 64 vivo, Radeon 8500, 9700 Pro, 9800 Pro, 9800 XT, X850XTPE, x1900XTX CrossFire. But as of late been more of a performance, sweet spot buyer -- 8800 GT, GTX 260 and GTX 470.

Will talk later with financials from the players and market share -- and when Kepler is out. We can move forward and just agree to disagree for now.
 
Last edited:

slayernine

Senior member
Jul 23, 2007
895
0
71
slayernine.com
If nVidia launches awesome hardware at a low price it will be good for everyone. ATI will not make stupid huge margins on video cards and the consumer will win with a choice between two different more reasonably priced graphics cards.

YAY CAPITALISM!!!
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |