exar333
Diamond Member
- Feb 7, 2004
- 8,518
- 8
- 91
Yeah, that's pretty impressive.Less than 1-inch with a 1070. Nice.
Yeah, that's pretty impressive.Less than 1-inch with a 1070. Nice.
In the old thread someone posted that the 1070 laptop part was a more "full" part than the 1070 desktop, which is why it scaled so well while underclocked. Anyone have more info on that or remember what post it was?
Real problem is 3xGPC vs 4xGPC.Its a 2048 shader SKU instead of the 1920 shaders in the desktop GTX1070.
From the manufacturer’s side of this coin, NVIDIA has supposedly been quite conservative with their reference clocks on the GTX 1080, GTX 1070 and GTX 1060 for notebooks. As a result and like we’ve continually seen from add-in board partners, some gaming laptops could come pre-overclocked out of the box.
There’s absolutely no denying that NVIDIA’s Pascal architecture will usher in a revolution within the gaming notebook space. The GTX 1080, GTX 1070 and GTX 1060 will be a dream come true for system integrators since they’re now able to shoehorn some impressive graphics horsepower into thin and light chassis. While I can only speak to my experience with a lone GTX 1070-based product thus far (more about the incredible ASUS G752 below), all indicators point towards these new GPUs being the quantum leap NVIDIA promised.
Perhaps the most incredible thing about this launch is how little has been sacrificed on the performance front. Previous generations of mobile GPUs cast aside cores, memory capacity and frequency to achieve TDPs necessary for their integration into even the largest of gaming notebooks. Indeed, while past GPU architectures claimed to offer desktop performance for the notebook market, the difference between theory and reality could be measured in light-years. Pascal graphics cores on the other hand have been ported as completely holistic entities with only some minor cut in base clocks. Not only will this provide true high end performance but it’s been achieved without revising those already-stringent notebook design specs and it’s those guidelines that have effectively cut AMD out of this segment. As a matter of face these cards are so damn capable that users could face the very real possibility of CPU bottlenecking at 1080P, particularly with low voltage mobile processors.
How are the notebook parts running faster than the desktop parts?
This begs the question why have a gimped 1070 desktop edition? Was it killing them to include the last 128 SM cluster, I mean come on nVIDIA...
Nvida cant make proper cutdown card.Much bigger margins on the notebook parts. Also a need to use the mildly faulty dies somewhere.
Only fail here is you stop trolling.
If you downlock Desktop version to mobile version clock and set same TDP you can compare both cards.
mobile version with 4xGPC is way faster at same clock and TDP than desktop.
Its 10% at 1080P and more at 4k.
This begs the question why have a gimped 1070 desktop edition? Was it killing them to include the last 128 SM cluster, I mean come on nVIDIA...
It will not be 1080.It will be like every other normal cutdown card.Not gimped crap like desktop version is now.You can see from youtube that there are scenes where GTX1080 is even more than 30% faster than 1070 at same clock...Sigh, if they included the last cluster it would be a 1080....think about it!
GTX1070-only 3xGPC and 33% less SP than 1080, 48Rops.
It will not be 1080.It will be like every other normal cutdown card.Not gimped crap like desktop version is now.You can see from youtube that there are scenes where GTX1080 is even more than 30% faster than 1070 at same clock...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPnKj9sfiZM
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2016/08/23/deus-ex-mankind-divided-benchmarked/4
EDIT:1070 with 2048SP and 4xGPC the 1080 still have 25% MORE SP.That is more than enough to have large performance gap.But it will not be 30% but 15-20 max.
In this scene GTX1080 is 30% faster than 1070. We already know Mobile 1070 version is around 10% faster at same clock than desktop.GTX1070 have 46fps and GTX1080 59Fps.With 4xGPC and 2048SP GTX1070 will have 51fps so GTX1080 would be 15% faster and not 30% faster
https://youtu.be/QPnKj9sfiZM?t=55
Honestly man, you have spent a lot of time and energy talking about why the 1070 sucks and NVIDIA should have made it differently. If that's the case, why did you buy it?