Yacoub, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
No, it's highly opinionated but not insane or idiotic at all... at least what was meant.
A) It's suggested the ATI drivers are less stable in general. Which I agree with besides the early Vista drivers.
B) It's suggested that's the only time nVidia's are instable. Which I disagree with, but is subject to personal experiences.
C) It's suggested that nVidia did pretty good to only fall by taking something the magnitude of a fan failing to run.
It's quite rational thought, nobody is dumber (but thanks for trolling!!), BUT it is not backed up by evidence proving it... so in some ways although unfounded, it's not so different than a lot of other posts where people may or may not have evidence but didn't provide it.
I disagree with the statement as a whole but it is actually possible it is true to an extend someone could rationally hold that as a fair assumption.
... that doesn't make the whole affair stink any less though, WTF is nVidia thinking not putting a driver through even enough QC to catch this kind of problem?