NY State plans to subsidize Buffalo Bills new stadium

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
It probably doesn't include other associated costs like increased police on game nights, increased road wear and rear, adding roads/lanes to accomodate increased volume a few times per year, etc... My guess is that putting in greenspace and investing the saved money would be a much better ROI for everyone involved.
There's been a lot of research on this and the overwhelming conclusion is that spending on sports stadiums is a huge waste of money. Hochul has a lot of support upstate so I imagine she's doing this to fend off a possible primary challenge by Cuomo or whatever.

Hopefully as it still needs to be approved by the legislature they can kill it after she wins the primary or whatever.
 

pauldun170

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2011
9,139
5,074
136
More than $418 million of the state's $600 million share will come from a delayed casino-related payment from the Seneca Nation, the governor said late Tuesday. Erie County will pay $250 million toward the project.

The payment from the Seneca Nation covers a share of revenue over five years from three of the tribe's western New York casinos. The tribe stopped payments in 2017, saying its obligation to share revenue with the state and localities had expired.

The Seneca Nation Council ended the yearslong payment dispute with the state this week by authorizing the transfer of $565 million that had been held in escrow.

"These funds were generated in western New York, and I am directing the state's share, which is more than $418 million, to the new Buffalo Bills stadium," Hochul said in a release. "This will ensure the Bills remain in New York state and support 10,000 construction jobs."

Under the deal proposed by Hochul, New York state and Erie County would be allowed to hold some events at the stadium when the Bills aren't using it, though they will be required to use the Bills' authorized vendor to sell any tickets.

The Bills will have to pay an annual rent of $900,000 that will go into the capital improvement fund.


oof
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,035
5,338
136
Even more annoying is it's not the locals footing the bill, it's the entire state and in New York State that mostly means downstate is footing the bill.

I'm all for helping upstate economically develop as it's a really depressed region but I want my tax dollars to go to something useful, not a fucking football stadium for a billionaire.
yea, sorry, I was a bit fast and loose with my terminology. I did mean residents of the affected state.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
14,875
10,300
136
It's bullshit to have the locals foot the bill for this. 100% bullshit, each and every place it happens.
A lot of times it's from taxes on hotels and rental cars, which is also bullshit "tax the people that get no say."
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
96,183
15,776
126
Is the people of NY going to get 800M worth of tickets free? Didn't think so.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,699
6,196
126
What the fuck did I just read?
An expression of truth you can’t understand. Of course you might really enjoy going to a state owned tax payer funded colosseum where all manner of porn stars perform for crowds of people. Maybe they could be put on by political parties to attract voters by the magnitude of the spectacle.

Personally, I would prefer cities to build arenas where they could exchange matches where local volunteers could go to rape and beat each other to death with clubs.

Self knowledge isn’t for the faint hearted. Why inner need does being a sport fan satisfy?
 

SmCaudata

Senior member
Oct 8, 2006
969
1,532
136
I'm against any tax payer funding for stadiums or businesses, it always is a losing proposition, just look at foxconn in WI, that was a total disaster for the area.
Agreed. Businesses already get to deduct everything to the point they somehow look negative while making money hand over fist. Individuals can't even write of true necessities for the most part. Why are we making workers pay for that shit?
 
Reactions: hal2kilo and Zorba

echo4747

Golden Member
Jun 22, 2005
1,978
156
106
Well. the state should get considerable state income tax revenue from players/coaches salaries I am sure these folks are in the top income tax bracket and the salary cap seems always be increasing. I am sure additional income tax revenue goes to the state from those who operate/maintain the stadium as well. Probably get substantial sales tax revenue from food/drinks sold on gamedays too. I wonder how long it takes for the state to recoup that $$
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
Well. the state should get considerable state income tax revenue from players/coaches salaries I am sure these folks are in the top income tax bracket and the salary cap seems always be increasing. I am sure additional income tax revenue goes to the state from those who operate/maintain the stadium as well. Probably get substantial sales tax revenue from food/drinks sold on gamedays too. I wonder how long it takes for the state to recoup that $$
The answer is essentially 'never'. Stadiums are just giant money pits and subsidies for rich people.


Stadiums generate little new spending, they mostly just transfer entertainment spending from other sources. So you get tax money from selling food and drinks, but you would have gotten the same tax money from that person spending their money at some other entertainment venue.
 

pete6032

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2010
7,579
3,124
136
An expression of truth you can’t understand. Of course you might really enjoy going to a state owned tax payer funded colosseum where all manner of porn stars perform for crowds of people. Maybe they could be put on by political parties to attract voters by the magnitude of the spectacle.

Personally, I would prefer cities to build arenas where they could exchange matches where local volunteers could go to rape and beat each other to death with clubs.

Self knowledge isn’t for the faint hearted. Why inner need does being a sport fan satisfy?
Come on, gas light me some more. I'm really enjoying it.
 

echo4747

Golden Member
Jun 22, 2005
1,978
156
106
The answer is essentially 'never'. Stadiums are just giant money pits and subsidies for rich people.


Stadiums generate little new spending, they mostly just transfer entertainment spending from other sources. So you get tax money from selling food and drinks, but you would have gotten the same tax money from that person spending their money at some other entertainment venue.

I happen to reside in the western NY and part of the story the news is relaying is that this proposed new stadium will not only host Bills games but will be suited for many other various events (concerts, an area inside for weddings, and other similar events that could be best described as convention center type events) I am sure there is some value in having an NFL team that may make the area more appealing in so far as attracting other businesses as well.
I'm sure in the very short term, its probably not a good investment ... I guess it depends how long it takes the state to recoup the $$
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,699
6,196
126
The answer is essentially 'never'. Stadiums are just giant money pits and subsidies for rich people.


Stadiums generate little new spending, they mostly just transfer entertainment spending from other sources. So you get tax money from selling food and drinks, but you would have gotten the same tax money from that person spending their money at some other entertainment venue.
But they only get built because people prefer to indulge themselves rather than boycott professional sports and end the problem. Sports fans are a lot like NYMBYs. They won't vote to end state subsidies of sports arenas. You can still enjoy Muhammad Ali killing his brain on YouTube.
 
Reactions: zinfamous

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
11,353
2,363
136
The Raiders got a shit ton of taxpayer money to move to Vegas.
It's funded by a special hotel tax, so at least it's the tourists who are paying and not Nevadans. Mark Davis is a bit of a special case because almost his entire net worth is from Raiders ownership. Unlike most major sports owners, he's too cash poor to self-finance a new stadium; so he found a growing city willing to do it for prestige reasons. That doesn't mean I support what Las Vegas did, but it's far less onerous than the largess from NYS.

On the West coast, new venues are never publicly funded. Voters just won't stand for it, and that's partly a reflection that we aren't as rabid as sports fans as other regions. Even if NYS had to do a lot to keep the Bills from leaving, $850M+ is way too large a number. The Pegulas are far too rich to be getting this much welfare from the state.
 
Jun 18, 2000
11,140
722
126
I happen to reside in the western NY and part of the story the news is relaying is that this proposed new stadium will not only host Bills games but will be suited for many other various events (concerts, an area inside for weddings, and other similar events that could be best described as convention center type events) I am sure there is some value in having an NFL team that may make the area more appealing in so far as attracting other businesses as well.
I'm sure in the very short term, its probably not a good investment ... I guess it depends how long it takes the state to recoup the $$

You aren't hearing him. The answer is never. It is never going to recoup the cost. Those weddings are simply moving from one venue to the Bills stadium.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,699
6,196
126
I happen to reside in the western NY and part of the story the news is relaying is that this proposed new stadium will not only host Bills games but will be suited for many other various events (concerts, an area inside for weddings, and other similar events that could be best described as convention center type events) I am sure there is some value in having an NFL team that may make the area more appealing in so far as attracting other businesses as well.
I'm sure in the very short term, its probably not a good investment ... I guess it depends how long it takes the state to recoup the $$
Why not build a giant retraining center for the homeless, including accommodations, to teach life skills, and create teams of skilled artisans that can build new housing throughout the city and beyond from start to finish, including the manufacture of building materials.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,525
27,829
136
Why not build a giant retraining center for the homeless, including accommodations, to teach life skills, and create teams of skilled artisans that can build new housing throughout the city and beyond from start to finish, including the manufacture of building materials.
Would that make good TV to sell beer ads?
 
Reactions: hal2kilo

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,305
10,804
136
This is disgraceful .... there are places that money could be spent that would do some real good.
 

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,547
2,759
136
It's funded by a special hotel tax, so at least it's the tourists who are paying and not Nevadans. Mark Davis is a bit of a special case because almost his entire net worth is from Raiders ownership. Unlike most major sports owners, he's too cash poor to self-finance a new stadium; so he found a growing city willing to do it for prestige reasons. That doesn't mean I support what Las Vegas did, but it's far less onerous than the largess from NYS.

On the West coast, new venues are never publicly funded. Voters just won't stand for it, and that's partly a reflection that we aren't as rabid as sports fans as other regions. Even if NYS had to do a lot to keep the Bills from leaving, $850M+ is way too large a number. The Pegulas are far too rich to be getting this much welfare from the state.
I live in Nevada. I remember that grift very well.

A 4 day special session was held to rubber stamp a proposal to waste $750 million of public funds on a football stadium. Legislators who voted against taxing businesses with revenues over $4 million per year to fund a national worst education system lined up to raise taxes to give to a purported billionaire.

"But it's a tax on tourism so Nevadans won't be paying it!"

Except they do. The reality is that while most of the population and tourism exists in Southern Nevada all of the State offices exist in Northern Nevada. People from the north travel to the south all the time. They pay the taxes too. It's not just a tax on tourism.

That also ignores opportunity cost. That $750 million could few been spent on something else (education maybe?). It was a bad deal pushed through with no real consideration because some local yokels wanted their 5 minutes of national fame.
 
Reactions: Pohemi

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
14,875
10,300
136
I happen to reside in the western NY and part of the story the news is relaying is that this proposed new stadium will not only host Bills games but will be suited for many other various events (concerts, an area inside for weddings, and other similar events that could be best described as convention center type events) I am sure there is some value in having an NFL team that may make the area more appealing in so far as attracting other businesses as well.
I'm sure in the very short term, its probably not a good investment ... I guess it depends how long it takes the state to recoup the $$
It likely won't get any more of those other events than the current stadium. Not that many events need 70-100k seats.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
72,699
6,196
126
I live in Nevada. I remember that grift very well.

A 4 day special session was held to rubber stamp a proposal to waste $750 million of public funds on a football stadium. Legislators who voted against taxing businesses with revenues over $4 million per year to fund a national worst education system lined up to raise taxes to give to a purported billionaire.

"But it's a tax on tourism so Nevadans won't be paying it!"

Except they do. The reality is that while most of the population and tourism exists in Southern Nevada all of the State offices exist in Northern Nevada. People from the north travel to the south all the time. They pay the taxes too. It's not just a tax on tourism.

That also ignores opportunity cost. That $750 million could few been spent on something else (education maybe?). It was a bad deal pushed through with no real consideration because some local yokels wanted their 5 minutes of national fame.
People who take pride in external identifications like sport teams are suckers for external manipulation by cunning psychopaths who can easily read peoples' weaknesses. Only the awakening of proper self love can prevent this. The first hurdle to awakening is the terrible horror of who one is asleep. Not for the fainthearted as I said.

People rarely examine their culturally inherited traditions. We have a deep fear of being different and not fitting in. Notice my welcome reception.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
84,812
49,499
136
But they only get built because people prefer to indulge themselves rather than boycott professional sports and end the problem. Sports fans are a lot like NYMBYs. They won't vote to end state subsidies of sports arenas. You can still enjoy Muhammad Ali killing his brain on YouTube.
I generally agree - like with NIMBYism its mostly a case of bad incentives created by dumb government regulation, combined with the natural selfishness of people. Sports leagues have an antitrust exemption that allows them to abuse their monopolistic position in society and since there are only 32 NFL teams they have a lot of leverage to extort cities for stadium funding. The fans don't really care as their share of the tax cost is small compared to the benefits they get from it, and politicians know they will pay a high political price if the team leaves, but probably not if they waste a bunch of tax dollars to keep them there.

So it's basically a situation where bad government regulation leads to a situation where it's individually rational for all these different groups to do something that hurts society as a whole. Greedy owner gets a lot of money, sports fans keep their team, politicians get re-elected, everyone else gets screwed. It really is just like NIMBYism for housing!
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |