It's always amusing and ironic when socialists and unions get at each other's throats. This is a good example of why public employees shouldn't be allowed to form unions. It just encourages cronyism and gives too much power to unelected officials. Fire the buggers if they're not doing their jobs. All of them if you have to. That's what Reagan did with the ATC workers.
On the flip side...
I know very little about New York City politics. I do remember hearing on the radio that people were saying that DeBlasio was going to be a problem. Especially on the law and order front. That was back when he was elected. A lot of cops feel that he encouraged anti-police protests which led to the shooting. The man seems to waffle about trying to keep both sides happy. That's not leadership though. If the police are racist, condemn them. If the protesters are violent or inciting violence, condemn them. Man the hell up and lead.
What a bunch of nonsense.
Socialists at odds with unionists is just fine - there's supposed to be some conflict. The alternative is a screw-the-worker approach that hurts the middle class (oh wait, that's America post-Reagan as nearly everyone in America has stopped getting any share of economic growth and the rich get it all). Countries like France have a lot of strikes - and a lot of advantages for the workers as a benefit.
Of course you have a very practical solution, fire all NYC police.
Oh, 'people saying on the radie De Blasio would be a problem'. That's quality information.
He's an excellent mayor.
These police behaviors are showing how reform WAS badly needed, that there's a reason why he won by running on that.
This isn't a case of him being 'anti-police' or wrong on the issues. It's a case of union thuggery and police thuggery.
Turns out the NYC police have behaved this way for a long time, decades. They're wrong here.
These two murders of police had basically nothing to do with the protests, which advocated the opposite of those crimes. A crazy criminal used them as an excuse.
The alternative you are suggesting is that people not be allowed to protest, or at least that the mayor oppose their right to protest, and to take the wrong side on the issues.
You say he is waffling - I haven't seen it. I've seen him do very well with the issues, which just happen to have more than one simple side.
He's showing very good leadership - the problem is your citizenship.
You ask for him to condemn racism by police and violence by protestors. He's done both.